[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

(1) Here is one more fitting for the theme:

An accountant friend of mine went for an interview for a new job and he thought it was going quite well. But when the interviewer reached the end of the session he asked him to answer the next question as quickly as possible: "what is six times nine?" My friend instantly answered "fifty two!" then followed up with "Oh blast!", knowing instantly that it was wrong.

He was very surprised, therefore to receive a call next day offering him the job. They talked for a while then my friend asked how they could want him when, as a professional accountant, he didn't even know what six nines were. The interviewer replied - "No problem - you made the best estimate!"

(2) Thanks for that Pat; it got my thought processes going again and I think that I now know how the electron fits in my model.

regards
Felix

PS - sorry for the lack of participation lately - cat flu and the vet told me to rest.

Glad to see you made a trip back to the ToeBox and that you must therefore feel better, Felix. Here's my contribution:

An accountant visited the Natural History museum. While standing near the dinosaur he said to his neighbor: "This dinosaur is two billion years and ten months old".

"Where did you get this very exact information?"

"I was here ten months ago, and the guide told me that the dinosaur was two billion years old."

Now, Pat, I do want to finagle a bit about the BarA. I would like to suggest to call it u, for otherwise I would have to name the background something different each and every time I add a circle. If I add circle B, I'd have to call the background BarAB. if I add C, it would become BarABC. By declaring it u we have a single tag that stays the same, and by not capitalizing it and italicizing it, the tag is different from the others. Okay with you?

[JAK]

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

...
(2) Thanks for that Pat; it got my thought processes going again and I think that I now know how the electron fits in my model.

regards
Felix

PS - sorry for the lack of participation lately - cat flu and the vet told me to rest.

Welcome back, Felix!

Where will your electron update be posted? Here or in the Dance?

-JAK

[Profpat]

Hi guys;

I'm glad we are all back posting. Thank you for the accountant's jokes I need fresh jokes for my classes.

Fredrick:

As far as calling that area u or z, " Anything you want to call it boss "

Felix:

Take cat nip 2x daily and many cat naps, and hopefully you'll be your own feline self in a couple of days.

JAK:

Since you didn't tell an accountants joke here is one on your behalf. ( last one guys, I promise )

A doctor, an engineer, and an accountant were out golfing when they started to discuss who had the oldest profession.
The doctor said he did, for when God made Eve out of Adam's rib that was a surgical procedure.
The engineer said " Wait a minute, for when God made order out the chaos, that was an act of engineering."
The accountant said " And who do you think started the chaos? "

Best to all,

Pat

[acoustic_symbiosis]

Hi Pat, had a look at the PDF and sort of got the idea?yoiu speak of genesis 1-3 as do i in my TOE, difference being i take the word SAID as literal, being the operative word.The relevance of this with my TOE is the idea of a co-operative symbiotic relationship between 2 organic life forms.1 the creator the other that which it created....the physics by which the big bang occured was what i call Acoustic Symbiosis.
or wave particle symbiosis. anyway food for thought regards
Simon http://www.myspace.com/acoustic_symbiosis

[Profpat]

More Contemplation on the Triple Spiral.

From This:




Triple Spiral

To This


TRIPLE ROTATION

?????????????

[Felix Schrodinger]

Originally Posted by JAK

Where will your electron update be posted? Here or in the Dance?

Hi JAK

In 'The Dance of Shiva' but I have to draw it first

regards
Felix

[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by Profpat

I like the visual, Pat. In this picture you show a conceptual delivery of the directions, and that is always helpful in understanding how matter and dynamics function. I would take it one step further, though, to match the concept up with reality, and add at least the visual one more time, as follows:






Only when placing the basics of dynamics in an actual dynamic field will the dynamics deliver something dynamical. (Yes, ugly sentence, I know.) Though these two pictures together show only some interactions, a more interesting visualization was created, allowing us to pose the question: "What's going on there?" I hope the following makes sense: instead of seeing the dynamics as coming from/being driven by the center only, the dynamics have become actions that stand on themselves to some extent as well. The matter is influenced by its surrounding, simply because there is nothing else to stop that influence. The point I am trying to make is that matter is not solely driven by the whole. Matter is driven by itself (while moving away from point X).

Naturally, this dynamic reality can be delivered by a single picture too, for instance, one that shows more dual actions going on at the heart of the matter; that requires a new drawing. Or, if you want to keep using this single picture, we can view this entire constellation as moving away in a single direction collectively with seeing the shown actions as the relative actions only, and not as all directional action.


Here is a picture showing some good dynamics:



You can see two galaxies morphing into what hopefully will one day be a stable situation again. The attraction by the 'two parts' will ultimately flow back into a collective situation of a new entire galaxy moving away from point X (the Big Bang). Point X is truly important in grasping dynamics. Without point X, no image on dynamics is complete, though the dual underlying nature of dynamics is already delivered when showing two entities within a certain vicinity such as visible in this hubble picture. But when you view this picture, try to see it moving away through space collectively in an overall single direction as well. In my perspective/opinion, that makes for easier understanding of what is going on, and allows the brain to move away from seeing the center(s) as the only paramount aspect of dynamics.

[Profpat]

Hi Fredrick:

Your double posting of the triple rotation got me pondering. If you look at it, they are going in the same direction, as you depicted, and they appear they would annihilate each other. When I put just one image up to the mirror they go in opposite direction, but they appear to complement each other.

Just an observation I noticed. Thanks for your input.

Pat

[Fredrick]

Originally Posted by Profpat

Hi Fredrick:

Your double posting of the triple rotation got me pondering. If you look at it, they are going in the same direction, as you depicted, and they appear they would annihilate each other. When I put just one image up to the mirror they go in opposite direction, but they appear to complement each other.

Just an observation I noticed. Thanks for your input.

Pat

That is indeed an interesting way to look at it, Pat. Thanks for letting me know. Here is an optical illusion I like:





The trick is to stare at the center and then move your head to and fro the screen; then you'll see the circles move in different directions. Of course nothing but your head moved, but that's how easy it is to trick the eye.

In my case, when I see your picture, Pat, doubled next to each other, I do not see any annihilation, rather I see two fields of matter floating with some attraction occurring at the edges where they are close to each other. Funny, not?

[Profpat]

In my case, when I see your picture, Pat, doubled next to each other, I do not see any annihilation, rather I see two fields of matter floating with some attraction occurring at the edges where they are close to each other. Funny, not?

Hi Fredrick;

I see what you mean. I think the problem may be in the synchronicity. They appear to be going counter-clockwise. If they are both going down to the left and up on the right at the same time. no problem. But if one is going up on the right when the other is going down on the left, then it appears the arrows would collide.

Best,

Pat