I'm glad you found the link useful. I wasn't sure if I should have posted it on your thread or mine. I decided here because it was a model of a quark and electron, something we were discussing here.
I have a couple comments regarding the quote:
"So, particles are not vibrations on a string (as in superstrings), but the vibratory motions of quantum defects (holes) in space. Hence, matter is essentially a negative energy defect in the fabric of space. One can understand from this the intimate link between space, matter and energy. As is mentioned subsequently, an excited particle is caused by the vibratory motions of these millions of holes (in stable configurations) that compose a piece of matter."
I believe the electron could very well be a negative area in space ( a ripple. field or dimple or hole ), which is created through a beam from the proton.
As far as the string itself I have always been open that it may be a vortex, funnel, spring, curved space, etc. I view it as the FS however. whether it be mass or energy.
I'm glad you found the link useful. I wasn't sure if I should have posted it on your thread or mine. I decided here because it was a model of a quark and electron, something we were discussing here.
I have a couple comments regarding the quote:
"So, particles are not vibrations on a string (as in superstrings), but the vibratory motions of quantum defects (holes) in space. Hence, matter is essentially a negative energy defect in the fabric of space. One can understand from this the intimate link between space, matter and energy. As is mentioned subsequently, an excited particle is caused by the vibratory motions of these millions of holes (in stable configurations) that compose a piece of matter."
I believe the electron could very well be a negative area in space ( a ripple. field or dimple or hole ), which is created through a beam from the proton.
As far as the string itself I have always been open that it may be a vortex, funnel, spring, curved space, etc. I view it as the FS however. whether it be mass or energy.
Best,
Pat
Thanks, Pat (and thank you Austin for adding more fun to the thread; sorry for not being more funny, but some people are born funny, others are born the normal way).
I would say we are out of this by now, Pat; it is not good to hang onto linguistics for too long, but I am glad our discussion did go there to show how the images we have in our minds attribute to our understanding of the outside world as well. Though not a string person myself, if one can create a whole picture from it, then that would be helpful for other people's understanding of the whole. I can do it without strings attached.
The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not.
What if stringiness had another way of raveling, say, that the ether was of such tiny stuff that it wasn't so particulate in nature but was more of a liquid thing?
Then currents passing oppositely alongside would twirl and swirl into a neutron, over millions of years until compressed to some limit dictated by the centripetal that we call 'solid', then break a bit into a proton and and an electron. (see thread of Fluid Energy Theory (FET))
I have a small question for Prof. If matter is essentially an extension of rip-offs in the fabric of space time, then what is anti matter? IS it also a rip off of the space time fabric? Becase if they anhilate each other, then the hole in the fabric should heal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrick
Thanks, Pat (and thank you Austin for adding more fun to the thread; sorry for not being more funny, but some people are born funny, others are born the normal way).
I would say we are out of this by now, Pat; it is not good to hang onto linguistics for too long, but I am glad our discussion did go there to show how the images we have in our minds attribute to our understanding of the outside world as well. Though not a string person myself, if one can create a whole picture from it, then that would be helpful for other people's understanding of the whole. I can do it without strings attached.
I have a small question for Prof. If matter is essentially an extension of rip-offs in the fabric of space time, then what is anti matter? IS it also a rip off of the space time fabric? Becase if they anhilate each other, then the hole in the fabric should heal.
Hi Dipayankar;
Welcome back to my thread. I've missed your questions like the one above.
I like your logic and my answer is I don't know. I would say this however, If space has a fabric, which I believe it does ( Ether, made up of strings or radiation or whatever ), then it already has matter.
I accept antimatter as described by the standard model, namely the same particle, with opposite charge. And so the electron has a positron with a positive charge. A proton has an antiproton with a negative charge. Chargeless particles like the photon and neutron are their own antiparticle.
There is still much to explore here Dipayankar, and so let's explore.
Linear Mode
