Dear profpat,
I've downloaded the pdf file and your idea looks to me very interesting and condensed with much hard work and volumes of thought concentrated in few pages.
I don’t claim to be an expert, but it looks to me a very interesting synthesis of hitherto unrelated spheres of knowledge. I feel that while a layman like me is unqualified to provide a critical review or comment on the substance and content of the theory, I'm nonetheless very interested from a generalist point of view in any possible or potential syntheses between widely divergent bodies of knowledge.
But I think the main problem with your idea is not in the substance or content but lies in the form of the document. If I may make a suggestion on the presentability and readability of the Idea document, I would like to see it more elaborated, with more text explaining pages 3, 4, and 5, for example, and with the sketches redesigned by a graphics designer using Photoshop or similar software, with all text retyped on word, or similar, symbols and notations printed using a symbol template and , and then all text, and images uploaded in the form of an article or a series of postings on this thread. The existing form with all the hand sketches can be then preserved as a first draft for historical value after the Idea / theory becomes popular.
I wish you and your Idea all the interest, good wishes and the success your hard work and lightening insights deserve.
Best regards, Safwan


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote


