An Idea

[safwan]

TO EVERYONE

An afterthought:

If any one knows how to import the contents of that adobe/pdf file and open it for this thread I would be eternally grateful.

Pat

Dear profpat,

I've downloaded the pdf file and your idea looks to me very interesting and condensed with much hard work and volumes of thought concentrated in few pages.

I don’t claim to be an expert, but it looks to me a very interesting synthesis of hitherto unrelated spheres of knowledge. I feel that while a layman like me is unqualified to provide a critical review or comment on the substance and content of the theory, I'm nonetheless very interested from a generalist point of view in any possible or potential syntheses between widely divergent bodies of knowledge.

But I think the main problem with your idea is not in the substance or content but lies in the form of the document. If I may make a suggestion on the presentability and readability of the Idea document, I would like to see it more elaborated, with more text explaining pages 3, 4, and 5, for example, and with the sketches redesigned by a graphics designer using Photoshop or similar software, with all text retyped on word, or similar, symbols and notations printed using a symbol template and , and then all text, and images uploaded in the form of an article or a series of postings on this thread. The existing form with all the hand sketches can be then preserved as a first draft for historical value after the Idea / theory becomes popular.

I wish you and your Idea all the interest, good wishes and the success your hard work and lightening insights deserve.

Best regards, Safwan

[Profpat]

Safwan;

Thank you so much for your time reviewing An Idea, and your comments, which I agree with.

I perceive you to be very intelligent Safwan, and to me that trumps (beats) specific knowledge.

I am hoping you'll soon start a thread on GUTOE, your wonderful conceptual synthesis of unifying gravity and everything.

Good Luck to you,

Pat

P.S. My ex-wife agrees with you also on getting a graphic designer.

[safwan]

Safwan;

Thank you so much for your time reviewing An Idea, and your comments, which I agree with.

I perceive you to be very intelligent Safwan, and to me that trumps (beats) specific knowledge.

I am hoping you'll soon start a thread on GUTOE, your wonderful conceptual synthesis of unifying gravity and everything.

Good Luck to you,

Pat

P.S. My ex-wife agrees with you also on getting a graphic designer.

You're welcome Pat, I didn't really do anything special, and the graphic designer is not really a big problem.

All the best, Safwan

[cosvis]

Thank you Pat.

At last I was able to see your interesting site and I believe the drawing of your grandson is terrific. Did you draw it yourself? The six rings made an interesting symmetry between the eyes mouth and nose. How wanderful God has created us in his image. To me each child reflects the infinite love of God, especially seen in the eyes of a child.

My understanding of the quark particles is not so great; so that your theory of the universe I still find somewhat mysterious. But let us continue to share our knowledge and beliefs.

Yours Cosvis.

[Profpat]

Thank you Cosvis;

I started with a quote from the Upanishad that in the void is life and joy. and I ended with my only grandchild, which to me represents life and joy.

Best to you and again thanks for taking the time.

Pat

[Tina]

Addendum #1

I forgot to mention the two up quarks and one down quark,may be the model for our own body i.e. 2 eyes 1 nose; 2 ears 1 mouth; 2 arms 1 trunk; 2 lungs 1 heart; 2 kidneys 1 liver right down to our sex organs.
Coincidence?

best always

Pat

Just looking over prior posts - 2 quarks up 1 quark down - this forms a triangle - what do you think that means?

[Profpat]

Hi Tina;

You'll have to access my Idea at;( http://www.toequest.com/forum/yourto...2803-idea.html ), and then you'll need to access a PDF file. Being a new member, you might have to wait a few days before you can access the PDF file.

But please do, when you can, as I would love to hear your comments.

Best to you,

Pat

[Tina]

Hi Tina;

You'll have to access my Idea at ...
But please do, when you can, as I would love to hear your comments.

No trouble accessing. Had a quick read through to get gist before go back and study in more detail. But quantum maths (if that's what it is?) know nil so leaves me unable to understand these sections fully.

1) Scenario: 1 proton, 1 neutron and 1 electron meet one day and they decide that if they worked together they could achieve everything. So they formed a particle and have remained in this alliance ever since. Why does the alliance adhere...while all known alliances break down eg chemical change.

2) If constant change (I Ching) how are you defining " constant" "change"?

[Profpat]

[quote=Tina;34979]

1) Scenario: 1 proton, 1 neutron and 1 electron meet one day and they decide that if they worked together they could achieve everything. So they formed a particle and have remained in this alliance ever since. Why does the alliance adhere...while all known alliances break down eg chemical change.

2) If constant change (I Ching) how are you defining " constant" "change"?

Hi Tina;

Two good questions:

1) Science says the quarks stay together because of " gluons " . My model doesn't require them, I have them confined by their own superposing and interweaving. But you are right my model is a compound model requiring smaller particles to stay fixed. The evidence is that the proton cannot be destroyed, why this is I'm not sure, but you have a good question.

2) The I Ching is called the Book of Changes.
It's a divination text which tries to give one guidance, as to where one is going, and how to best prepare for those changes.

And so the changes are constantly going on.

Now to the physical the quarks ( gluons ) are constantly changing from one color to the other.

3) Thank you for taking time to read and comment on my Idea.

Best to you,

Pat

[cosvis]

Hi Pat and Tina,

I am not too familiar with the quark theory but I just wonder if the gluons are not gravitational strings. I do not think they are the elusive graviton particles because I believe they do not exist. So the gluons would not be visible particles but they could still exist and have a gravitational effect on the quarks.

My Toe theory of the physical universe, as you know Pat, is based on the theory that the photon is a stable, preserved virtual mass particle, moving constantly at the speed of light, and consisting of two equal but opposite preserved forces and energies, gravitational and kinetic. The photon also known as a quantum particle is more basic or fundamental than the quark particle because I think it is the most basic stuff of the universe. I think the quark particle consists of quantum particles and this could be in a blackhole formation. What do you think? I am sure that the quantum particle must have something to do with quarks?

Yours Cosvis.