[Drifter]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY

The more we progress scientifically, the more things thought to be different are being merged as one, and the relevant questioning - unlike the irrelevant ultimate truth - is based on the lack of motion of absolute spacematter, where the non-existent inferences are only based on lack of physical properties. Then this: "The Prime Mover was, to Aristotle, a "thinking on thinking", an eternal process of pure thought." can perhaps become unthinkable, unnecessary, because there can be no literal rearranging of what has only one density and is everywhere at once, which equates to no density and nowhere at nonce.

Try this on for referential size . . .

http://www.seekerbooks.com/book/9780938998006.htm

[N0B0DY]

Now you're talkin, Drifter. I love Blavatsky.

I think only her and Santos - http://www.atlan.org/author/resume.htm - have discovered the real Atlantis and Garden of Eden. She has a remarkable way of putting together the principles set by Theoretical Science.

[Drifter]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY

Now you're talkin, Drifter. I love Blavatsky.

I think only her and Santos - http://www.atlan.org/author/resume.htm - have discovered the real Atlantis and Garden of Eden. She has a remarkable way of putting together the principles set by Theoretical Science.

I have several of Her books and could hardly put them down. An amazing lady.

Same with Her two volume Isis Unveiled, couldn't hardly put it down.
Only got through book one before moving on to other interest but brother, what an eye opener!

Havent heard of Santos, I'll have to look into that one sometime . . .

Best regards
D.

[Profpat]

Hi Nobody and Drifter;

Thank you both for your inputs but perhaps your discussion is better served on the ToN site.

It's all a bit to esoteric and ethereal for this thread which deals with reality and the proton/neutron.

Again thanks,

Pat

[N0B0DY]

Sorry, Pat, I thought you had said you allowed Fredrick to post god on your thread, and you can't get much more esoteric than that.

The links provided are the "real deal."

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY

Sorry, Pat, I thought you had said you allowed Fredrick to post god on your thread, and you can't get much more esoteric than that.

The links provided are the "real deal."

Actually it was Fredrick who allowed me to discuss God at his thread.

Just wanted to give Fredrick the proper credit.

Best to you Nobody.

Pat

[N0B0DY]

I know you're not that slow, Pat, judging from your idea. So no gods allowed on your thread then?

I think it's a shame that scriptural light cannot be incorporated into science, because it allows one to expound upon QM.

[Profpat]

There is only One God and He begins the Idea and ends the Idea with man being created in His Image and Likeness.

[Graybeard]

Originally Posted by Profpat

There is only One God and He begins the Idea and ends the Idea with man being created in His Image and Likeness.

Well Pat .... at least you said 'idea'. What about all the other species, flora, fauna and arkea ... whose likeness did he create them in ?

Are they original masterpieces and we are just copies ??? Pale shadows of the originals ??


cool banans .. greg

[Profpat]

HMMMM!!

Need to ponder that one Greg.

Best,

Pat