An Idea

[austintorn@aol.com]

I partly woke up here a few posts back:

http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-t...tml#post103502

Also, in Chemistry class once, we made a film of some oily stuff that was only 1-atom thick, on top of some water, so this film would really be 3D (having a minimum of the 3rd dimension) although mostly 2D.

[G_burnett]

I like your axis ponder a lot, Graham. Yet having a universe with an axis? I do not consider that possible. In my view, if there were such a movement, matter would absorb that movement fully, incorporating it at its own axes (plural). If matter was slung out from a spinning universe, that matter would not be spinning on the universal spin, but only on its own spins.

Good point, getting a view of wave being constructive or destructive in the small to the end of an electron and reinstatement of the electron demands the axis as the containment gets breached by in sync motion arround the axis and thus loss of containment motion. ... the electron is still there but at zero motion and infinite potential to come about to view. Sorry if this is not clear as it is a new ponder in the big for me. Will give it some more thought.
Kind regards graham

After thought ... the breach of containment I visualise is not a slung out event as the torus inversion is more like the Cats Eye Nebula view halfway through the inversion event. This would solve the paradox presented.... and frame drag considerations?

[Profpat]

I partly woke up here a few posts back:

http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-t...tml#post103502

Also, in Chemistry class once, we made a film of some oily stuff that was only 1-atom thick, on top of some water, so this film would really be 3D (having a minimum of the 3rd dimension) although mostly 2D.

You're right Austin an atom is 3 dimensional.

[G_burnett]

You're right Austin an atom is 3 dimensional.

actually Pat it is [x, y, z, t] and very few can put up a visual of this, blame mr E!

Kind regards g.

[austintorn@aol.com]

Prof, I think I hear Linda asking why you are still on the computer when she is there. Women are 99-Dimensional.

[Profpat]

actually Pat it is [x, y, z, t] and very few can put up a visual of this, blame mr E!

Kind regards g.

You're right G an atom is 4th dimensional.

[austintorn@aol.com]

And an atom extends minimally into the 5th dimension, whatever that is, maybe the set of all possible states of the atom—the superposition, and that's where it ends since the possible would only have more possibility behind it and that's not needed.

[Profpat]

actually Pat it is [x, y, z, t] and very few can put up a visual of this, blame mr E!

Kind regards g.

Illustrating the sine wave's fundamental relationship to the circle.
AND TIME




Yes we need time.

[Profpat]

And thinking about circles that brings up pi. I guess Plato's PERFECT CIRCLE would be pi. But pi appears to be never ending, always a little closer to expressing that Perfect Circle, but is always able to get it a little closer still. Perfection being an unobtainable goal in our reality but still we can come close. Maybe that is why some of the fetish of taking pi to the trillionth decimal place.

Just thinking a little math, a little metaphysics, a little physics.

Best,

Pat

[Profpat]

And thinking of pi(e):



A Thanksgiving favorite. The slice BTW represents the void which is necessary to create Pacman