An Idea

[Fredrick]

I will repost this picture inndicative of a cut away view of a torus with axial wobble ... the universe ... compliments of fernie view

at the end of he arms note the off x vector that will create the wobble ... kind regards graham

[Profpat]

Hi Fredrick;

That tear you mentioned is a one dimensional Planck Length Slit that is our UNIVERSE. And you have a near infinite number of one dimensional Planck Length Pure Energy Strings coming out which is the ether or the space and everything which is attached to that space. Those strings are the essential building block for our universe, including the ether (space).

As far as the secret of the quarks it's my logical and imaginative belief that there are many free quarks. Quarks that didn't combine to make protons. Once the quarks are combined you cannot free it. Or if you prefer call them looped strings that have a center of gravity. This is our dark matter, again the dark energy are open strings, the expansive part of our universe.

Of course since these are strings they are totally off our radar. But we are able to see the effects of dark energy and dark matter

Best,

Pat

P.S. The good news is that we can't reduce it any further than a 1 dimensional Planck Length entity without it becoming a 0 dimensionless point I don't think there are fractional dimensions, only quantum, and I don't believe in fractional charges, only a charge or no charge.

[austintorn@aol.com]

Well, Prof, what else is there to solve?

Accounting is solved, plus that is boring.

I guess a unified mind could be like the collective Borg.

I can't think of anything right now, for I am in bliss.

Oh, here's one of your lectures you once gave:


A Very Calculating Account of Love

Professor ProfPat, having taught Accounting 101.0,
Once gave these opening remarks while mindfully
Undressing the entire female Catholic student body
And repeated the points here:

We will use the calculator to count the numerous ways
That love can be made, even times 2,
As well as to use our many calculating buttons
To more fruitfully multiply.

As for the zero point, there is no dividing that way—
So always wear a raincoat while in the shower,
For if the Maker wanted us to be totally naked,
We would have been born that way…

Oh, never mind, but please do wear a tiny raincoat
With a little hat to safely have sex
And therefore, of course, more oftenly.

Plus and minus can make an overlapping summation of one,
Or it can amount to a big 0—
Hopefully with a lot of steam and smoke
Made by fire and water.

If you smoke after sex,
Then you are obviously doing it much too fast.

Never place a square root in a round hole.

Be wary of crediting a debit while in the red.

Use the double entry system.

Do not become a numerator
If the sign of the denominator is
‘Do not enter’.

Numerators and denominators may be reversed
In cross multiplication for those indivisible.

Love divided by infinity still equals love.

Class over.

(Now everyone was excited about accounting.)

[G_burnett]

Yes but mine is the more modern version of Gamma ... you know the first that is now at the low end of the EM spectrum ... but i do see a vortex in the ones you posted ... graham

[Profpat]

[quote=austintorn@aol.com;103629]

Well, Prof, what else is there to solve?

Hi Austin;

How about information retrieval:




I figure the best information storage and retrieval system is the DNA molecule. Based on a double helix with the combination of only 4 basic chemicals, our whole personal software is installed. Again I think the essence of information recording and storage is within the proton. With a flurry of positive and negative charges (0/1 information bits) all being recorded and stored on 3
storage rings giving th


the information 3D capabilities.

Best,

Pat

[Fredrick]

Hi Fredrick;

That tear you mentioned is a one dimensional Planck Length Slit that is our UNIVERSE. And you have a near infinite number of one dimensional Planck Length Pure Energy Strings coming out which is the ether or the space and everything which is attached to that space. Those strings are the essential building block for our universe, including the ether (space).

As far as the secret of the quarks it's my logical and imaginative belief that there are many free quarks. Quarks that didn't combine to make protons. Once the quarks are combined you cannot free it. Or if you prefer call them looped strings that have a center of gravity. This is our dark matter, again the dark energy are open strings, the expansive part of our universe.

Of course since these are strings they are totally off our radar. But we are able to see the effects of dark energy and dark matter

Best,

Pat

P.S. The good news is that we can't reduce it any further than a 1 dimensional Planck Length entity without it becoming a 0 dimensionless point I don't think there are fractional dimensions, only quantum, and I don't believe in fractional charges, only a charge or no charge.

Thank you for the reply, Pat. The tear is the nothing part that was only real within the prior state, so we shouldn't be looking for anything of that kind in our universe. Still, the size of the tear may indeed be the Planck's length.

You have a lot of assumptions in your delivery, Pat (including the free quarks). I have only one: that there was a prior state containing certain potentials. From it, dependent quarks and their more-independent structures (proton, neutron) were created simultaneously. We can view the distinctions (between the quarks themselves, between quarks and the larger structures they belong to, and between the larger structures themselves). The essential middleground many may look for is indeed found in the middle, but there is no there there (no distinct entity); quark nor proton/neutron/atom are thé fundamental it — rather they are found either 'short' or 'too long' of it.

I also do not follow you in your desire to hierarchive it all. There is only one universe, and at that overall level there is no hierarchy. There is not a single galaxy that is thé galaxy of our universe. Galaxies come in different sizes, but they can only be categorized, not hierarchived. There is no single fundamental basis for all galaxies to hierarchive them. Only the galaxies themselves start having that communal 'ground' (i.e. fly in a communal direction). To place everything in a hierarchy is only possible at the 'local' level, not at the overall level. That means we can also not find a hierarchy at the smallest level about the overall level.

If you can capture that in string, please do so. But ultimately, the middleground of our universe's reality is right there between the quark/electron level and the proton/neutron/atom level.

Somehow, we are still a long way off from having a communal understanding of what happened and what the results are, Pat. But let's continue till we get it right.

[Fredrick]

Yes but mine is the more modern version of Gamma ... you know the first that is now at the low end of the EM spectrum ... but i do see a vortex in the ones you posted ... graham

Excellent. But do you see it continue in our current universe? Or is the vortex only visible because like a vase shattering on the ground it will show in its first instances how the force of hitting the ground reverberates through the vase? Framed differently: is it an enduring vortex you see in the modern image or is it a dissipating vortex? I am certain we still end up with a vase in pieces, and have no axis at the overall level, only a common background. Once the reverberations are gone, they are gone forgood. Meanwhile, the pieces can all have an axis, but the vase is gone forever.

[G_burnett]

i do not want to highjack the thread here in a direction of personal thought to much Fred so I am posting a work in progress link to my toe.
http://www.toequest.com/forum/103671-post264.html
I will refer you to this paper just out as well knowing you will apreciate it and will have a good reply that i will pass on to the author if is ok.
enjoy!
hmm i can not send it as a link.
will have to email it on request
kind regards graham

[Fredrick]

i do not want to highjack the thread here in a direction of personal thought to much Fred so I am posting a work in progress link to my toe.
http://www.toequest.com/forum/103671-post264.html
I will refer you to this paper just out as well knowing you will apreciate it and will have a good reply that i will pass on to the author if is ok.
enjoy!
hmm i can not send it as a link.
will have to email it on request
kind regards graham

I followed the link and read it; I find it very interesting, Graham. Yet there is no shifting in information: even the pseudo torus will in reality have dissipated (moved on) into the outward movement of what is then matter. It still leaves the ground rule for the universe as being that there is no singular ground rule (only ground rules). I may be drumming the same message, but I consider it vital. Connections can be found, but no overall connection (or said differently: the overall connection is that there is an ultimate disconnection.) Connections are only to be found at the 'local' level.

If we all point our finger truly straight up into the air, we are all doing the exact same thing, yet all our directions will point to different parts in the sky. It is more than just semantics: saying we are then all doing the same is incorrect.

As I see it, the vortex is a phenomenon of nothing; it disappears from the overall level (dissipates), and may (subsequently) be maintained at the 'local' level (black hole). Please provide further information if you feel I am not addressing the fundamental matter of your delivery.

[Profpat]

Hi Fredrick;

That 1 dimensional Planck Length Slit is our universe. That is why we are all at the center of the universe. That is why the big bang point isn't localized but rather everywhere, where you are at is the big bang point, our whole entire universe is that point expanded. And so we have have a series of expansions, the string expanding from the point, the quark expanding from the string , the proton expanding from the quarks, the atom expanding from the proton, the molecule expanding from the atom, the cell expanding from the molecule, the body expanding from the cell. Sequential processing Fredrick not all at once, but in a sequence of hierarchical steps. But believe what you will, but no more debate from you as to why you don't like sequencing, that has become redundant and boring.

Best,

Pat