[N0B0DY]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Yeah, and how many Universes from one impact??? 1, 2, 3..... infinite??? How much of energy would be required for infinite creation?? Would our laws of physics hold there?? and why??

If we consider the implications of the fractal geometry found in nature, the laws would necessarily be required to hold at an infinite number of scales in the case of perfect replication, and an infinite amount of energy would be required to create an infinite number of universes.

The implications could also explain the cause for mutation and hence evolution in the case of imperfect replication, but the laws would have to vary I would think in order to produce the random shapes. And this would only apply to isolated finite systems, not to a scenario where an infinite number of universes exist within each other.

[dipayankar]

Which means they will have to interact with neutrinos...

Originally Posted by Profpat I don't know Dipayankar, you may be right, but it appears dark matter clusters around glaxies and do appear to have gravity. I may be wrong but I thought dark matter may be quarks, ( subatomic particles ), which didn't become protons. Best, Pat

[dipayankar]

Why finite number of Universes? Is Energy finite in the system? IS ENERGY BEING CREATED IN OTHER UNIVERSES with different physical laws???

Originally Posted by N0B0DY If we consider the implications of the fractal geometry found in nature, the laws would necessarily be required to hold at an infinite number of scales in the case of perfect replication, and an infinite amount of energy would be required to create an infinite number of universes. The implications could also explain the cause for mutation and hence evolution in the case of imperfect replication, but the laws would have to vary I would think in order to produce the random shapes. And this would only apply to isolated finite systems, not to a scenario where an infinite number of universes exist within each other.

[N0B0DY]

I said isolated finite systems, Dip, not a finite number of universes. An observable universe, not an unobservable infinity, could then be conceived as originating in a big bang and evolving for a finite time.

As I understand it, all laws break down at the singularity of the finite system; whereas an infinite system wouldn't change at all - relative density wouldn't increase at all.

[michael]

Hi Profpat,

i am very new to this group and am very busy setting up my coms hwoever i have had a quick browse of you post. There are some very interesting notions there that i would like to understand iun due course

kind regards

michael

[dipayankar]

Would an infinite system still have a begining aka The Big Bang??

Originally Posted by N0B0DY I said isolated finite systems, Dip, not a finite number of universes. An observable universe, not an unobservable infinity, could then be conceived as originating in a big bang and evolving for a finite time. As I understand it, all laws break down at the singularity of the finite system; whereas an infinite system wouldn't change at all - relative density wouldn't increase at all.

[N0B0DY]

An eternal system could, but not an infinite one. The difference might be found here: http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/denying_time.shtml

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Which means they will have to interact with neutrinos...

Hi Dipayankar;

No I don't think they would. Quarks have mass, and therefore would cause gravity but neutrinos have no mass and so would not interact with quarks, or effect gravity.

Best,

Pat

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by michael Hi Profpat, i am very new to this group and am very busy setting up my coms hwoever i have had a quick browse of you post. There are some very interesting notions there that i would like to understand iun due course kind regards michael

Hi Michael;

Welcome to the Toequest forum. I hope you enjoy this site as much as I have. There are some very diverse topics and members here. I noticed you are from Australia. A number of our members are from there. I live in the USA.

Thanks for your interest in my Idea. If you have any questions or comments please post them at this site, or if you like you may PM me.

Best to you, and again welcome.

Pat

[austintorn@aol.com]

Time Came Into Being When "Stuff" Did