An Idea

[Felix Schrodinger]

Part of my Idea is that the strong nuclear and weak nuclear are part of the electro magnetic force. The binding action is the positive and negative domains in the 7 domained area of the proton or 8 domained area of the neutron. This binding or stacking has a limit and when reached would break down emitting alpha particles. I would like to see your description it sounds interesting.

Hi Profpat
Attached is an extract showing the diagram referred to (I can copy the text from Word but the diagram does not paste). It is based on a simple premise that all forces are really effects and do not rely upon the interchange of bosons. This is already accepted for gravity but not for the other 'forces' in nature.

Can you explain your 'binding action'?

regards
Felix

[Profpat]

Thanks for the link Felix. It is an ingenious way you have the proton attached to the neutron. If you continue though with a helium atom how would the 2 protons and2 neutrons attach. Wouldn't that necessitate a proton having a charge of +2.

In my idea I view the proton and neutron to be made up of positive and negative charges. This might be best explained by viewing the diagram of the octant, which is made up of 4 positive and 4 negative areas. The positive areas being surrounded by negative areas and the negative areas being surrounded by positive areas. Now if these were magnetic positive and negative areas you could attch another octant to the first one by making sure the positive areas are touching the negative areas, and so on.

However since the proton is a geodesic dome and not a geodesic sphere there would be a limit to this stacking.

Best to you Felix,

Pat

[Drifter]

The depression stayed with me for over a year; it was like an animal, a well-defined, spatially localizable thing. I would wake up, open my eyes, listen -- Is it here or isn't? No sign of it. Perhaps it's asleep. Perhaps it will leave me alone today. Carefully, very carefully, I get out of bed. All is quiet. I go to the kitchen, start breakfast. Not a sound. TV -Good Morning America-, David What's-his-name, a guy I can't stand. I eat and watch the guests. Slowly the food fills my stomach and gives me strength. Now a quick excursion to the bathroom, and out for my morning walk -and here she is, my faithful depression: "Did you think you could leave without me?"
Feyerabend writing in his autobiography, Killing Time

http://www.answers.com/topic/paul-feyerabend

http://www.answers.com/topic/copenhagen-interpretation

http://www.answers.com/topic/conscio...auses-collapse

http://www.answers.com/topic/length-contraction

[Felix Schrodinger]

The root of these paradoxes in relation to thoughtfulness and transcendence lies in the insuperable problem of formulating the aim. The aim cannot be anything less than Brahman. That is the eternal hope. Every single act can have that aim because each act focusses upon a specific target in time and space which is Brahman. That is, at one level, the joy and the absurdity of it. In every act of manifestation - bathing, walking, mailing a message - the Logos is present. There is a sense in which the aim - the transcendental Brahman - is present in each moment of time as well as in every act at each point of space and in every thought. What, then, obscures the aim of a manifold human being of becoming totally one and remaining constantly attuned to Brahman? Why does a person need the sacred OM as the bow and to be continually tuning all one's instruments? Can one ever receive in a world of shadowy knowledge any real teaching concerning the inward meaning of the Soundless Sound? Who will teach the true intonation of the OM and everything to which it corresponds in thought, motive, act and feeling? As the mystery deepens, one must come to recognize that even in the largest perspectives of life, one can discern something that is false and which obscures still greater realities.

Dear Drifter

Theosophy rules OK?

But my religious beliefs don't restrain me from wanting to know the truth about the construction of the universe which I perceive about me. Having an interest in the metaphysical does not preclude my quest in the physical - it only broadens it.

As Dr Johnson might have said "I'm sorry this reply is so long - I didn't have time to write a short one."

Felix

[Drifter]

That's fine Felix, as long as this "I" and this "me" is understood to be two seperate aspects of the One inseparable nature.
It isn't about 'religion' precluding, excluding anything, although 'religion', even scientific dogmatic 'beliefs' is oppressive to free-thought.
The nature of the universe is an ongoing event appearing as destruction and construction.
An involuting, convoluting torus rotating outward from within.
Taken together they are both evolving aspects.
Just another way of killing time.

Dear Drifter

Theosophy rules OK?

But my religious beliefs don't restrain me from wanting to know the truth about the construction of the universe which I perceive about me. Having an interest in the metaphysical does not preclude my quest in the physical - it only broadens it.

As Dr Johnson might have said "I'm sorry this reply is so long - I didn't have time to write a short one."

Felix

[Felix Schrodinger]

http://www.answers.com/topic/copenhagen-interpretation[/url]
http://www.answers.com/topic/length-contraction

Drifted back to the subject, eh?

Thanks for the links. The first includes an explanation of my own theory in opposition to Copenhagen - "Objective collapse theory" - I didn't know it had a name!

Just about to view the second and ascertain if my length has become contracted during my incarceration.

regards
Felix

[Profpat]

Nothing like a rotating hypercube to wake you up in the morning. Thanks Drifter,

Best to all,

Pat

[Drifter]

In no way intending to be argumentative Felix.
Just thought something therein might be useful to noone in particular.
These links were Googled hits from the, Observer affecting the observed, query.

Warmest regards, fellow Questor.

Drifted back to the subject, eh?

Thanks for the links. The first includes an explanation of my own theory in opposition to Copenhagen - "Objective collapse theory" - I didn't know it had a name!

Just about to view the second and ascertain if my length has become contracted during my incarceration.

regards
Felix

[Profpat]

I would like to open for discussion, the last page of my Idea. That is the underlying model for the human face.

The human face is the most beautiful structure in the universe. The more symmetrical, the more it represents beauty and health.

The model used in my Idea is the same basic model, with a few modifications, for the construction of the human face.
From the placing of the eye sockets to the placement of the eyes, from the 3 dimensional nose and the nose cavity, and even the nostrils, from the mouth, and the detachable jaw, all are present in correct proportion, to our face.

Additionally we have bilateral, or left right symmetry present here, as well as a brain in left right sections.

To me all this is more than coincidence but rather further evidence that this basic model, so simple, is able to transform into a most complex feature. This is why I believe my Idea is the essence of all reality.

I invite all comments and discussions on this topic from all members.

Best to all,

Pat

[Profpat]