An Idea

[Drifter]

Profpat,
These are the messages return from your links @
[didn't post to forum but came through on the forum e-mail notification]
http://thumbp2.mail.mud.yahoo.com/tn?sid=1361443971&mid=AGjJjkQAAQBbR5lucgOrwVKFZGU& partid=2.1&f=828&fid=Inbox (http://us.f828.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Inbox&MsgId=1037_2867526_165341_247 8_176059_0_9303_229174_937588962&bodyPart=2.1&tnef =&YY=12849&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&order=down&sort=d ate&pos=0&view=a&head=b&VScan=1&Idx=5)

Not to computer savvy here, any suggestions?


1. Sorry, Forbidden.

You don't have permission to access this URL on this server.

Please check the URL for proper spelling and capitalization. If you're having trouble locating a destination on Yahoo!, try visiting the Yahoo! home page or look through a list of Yahoo!'s online services. Also, you may find what you're looking for if you try searching below.
Search the Web advanced search | most popular
Please try Yahoo! Help Central if you need more assistance.

2. Your login session has expired.

[Profpat]

Sorry Drifter;

It was just an updated picture of my grandson.

I'll just say he growing fine.

Best,

Pat

[Profpat]

Hi Felix;

I think most physicist do accept the concept of ether.

Gravity curves something, and that something is the ether.

Here are a couple of quotes from Einstein. One dealing with images and the other with the ether.

Michio Kaku: "Einstein also said that behind every great theory there is a simple physical picture that even lay people can understand. In fact, he said, if a theory does not have a simple underlying picture, then the theory is probably worthless. The important thing is the physical picture; math is nothing but bookkeeping."


Amrit Sorli: Einstein stood on the point that the notion of "space" designates "gravitational ether", which is a physical reality. "With regards to the general theory of relativity, space cannot be imagined without ether",

Best to you,

Pat

[dipayankar]

This creates a confusion now.. If neutrinos do not have mass, then how are they generated?? What is the source??

Thanks for the link Neutralino;

To answer Dipayankars original question it doesn't appear they would interact with quarks.

Best to all,

Pat

[Drifter]

Water as needed Professor.

Awakening is a flowering of your innermost being.
It is a revelation of your essence,
hidden by long eons of self-delusion,
ignorance,
unbounded desires.

Enlightenment is an ending as well as a beginning:
the ending of the old, veiled, dark ego,
its longings, illusions, frustrations;
the beginning of a vast expanse,
an infinite field of the Unknown,
an adventure in consciousness.

It is a revolution:
it represents danger to the old way of life,
to old ways of thinking and living.

It is freedom from the known and the unknown;
from the real and the unreal;
from any appearance of division between you and Truth.

It is the abandoning of beliefs, dis-beliefs,
presumptions and stances,
self, ego,
call it what you will,
or call it nothing,
what it is.

It is the Path of the golden Dawn,
the Path out of the Night of Time
into the Bursting daylight of Eternal Now...

- Petros

Sorry Drifter;

It was just an updated picture of my grandson.

I'll just say he growing fine.

Best,

Pat

[Drifter]

Do Hydrogen Oxygen or Helium have mass?
Arent the "circles" labelled "H" and "O", just representations of another massless/aetheric dimension?
The "circle" representaions could be said to have mass[i.e. body]. But they merely point to what is not.

This creates a confusion now.. If neutrinos do not have mass, then how are they generated?? What is the source??

[MJA]

[quote=Felix Schrodinger;46238]

The main reason that physics is in such a mess is it's general rejection of the aether which arose from the acceptance of Relativity and the Michelson Morley experiments. Certainly quote


Hi Felix,

You are right on with your assessment of the mess of science today.
But I also see that your focus or certainty of it's cause is still somewhat vague.
Perhaps this will help.
You see that by removing the aether mankind or science has removed the unity that holds the universe together. And that furthermore you believe gravity is that missing link. Am I right about you?
If so,
I would suggest that the unity is not missing at all, that it is science, and it's flawed usage of measure, that has created the uncertainty, the untrue division or seperation of a universe that is truly united and or truly one. The aether you look for to hold it together is simply nature itself. By removing any uncertainty, theories, faiths, measure itself, the universe is united by the force of one. Mathematically the equation for this unity or oneness is simply = .
To help you understand, try this. Your hand is different than your arm, yet they are simply the oneness of you. What do you call that connection of yourself, aether, gravity, body, or is it simply the undivided truth?
Mankind divides the universal truth of one. Oops!
And then science ask what's wrong.

I truly like your thoughts and hope this helps,
Be one!

=
MJA

[Drifter]

Nature, is an anabolic-steroid.
Man, is a parabolic-reflection.

[Profpat]

This creates a confusion now.. If neutrinos do not have mass, then how are they generated?? What is the source??

Neutrinos may have mass Dipayankar;


Neutrino Mass?

No definite mass has been measured for the neutrino, and the standard comment about most experiments is "the results are consistent with zero mass for the neutrino". But this raises certain theoretical problems and there have been many attempts to set a range for the mass of the neutrino. Since its mass is evidently very small, if non-zero, the mass is usually stated in terms of its energy equivalent in electron volts. Most experiments conclude that the mass equivalent of the neutrino is less than 50 eV.

For the most part they were created at the "Big Bang"
though they are created today from nuclear reactions.

Best,

Pat

[Felix Schrodinger]

Thanks for the link Felix. It is an ingenious way you have the proton attached to the neutron. If you continue though with a helium atom how would the 2 protons and2 neutrons attach. Wouldn't that necessitate a proton having a charge of +2.

Hi Profpat

Sorry for the delay but I had not addressed the strong force wrt the helium nucleus. A possible configuration is attached but this bears a lot more resemblance to my face than yours!

Please don't ask about the electron as I have not configured that yet.

all the best

Felix

PS - regards to your grandson, who obviously takes after his grandaddy, but he still has too little fur on his face.