Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 680 of 910 FirstFirst ... 180 580 630 670 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 690 730 780 ... LastLast
Results 6,791 to 6,800 of 9095

Thread: An Idea

  1. #6791
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,531
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,755
    Thanked 3,866x in 2,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: An Idea



    (more from Zanelli)

    String Theory Cosmology and the BIVERSE

    In General Relativity gravitational collapse
    For a mass above the Schwarzchild mass limit
    Results in a prediction of
    The creation of a singularity,
    A point of infinite mass density.

    However, I think it fair to say
    That most Physicists, Cosmologists, etc.,
    Regard this prediction
    As a failure of General relativity
    Rather than a physical reality.

    In fact, cosmological models invoke
    Various Instanton structures
    Near or at the Planck scale
    Where time is wick rotated
    To produce a smooth curve,
    Rather than a singular point.

    For closed Universes Cosmologies
    This gives us a well behaved solution.

    However, various forms of singular points
    Persist for open Universe Cosmologies,
    Though milder than the classical GR singularity.

    However, in this post, the question of open
    Or closed Universes will be quite beside the point.

    It is well known that in Loop Quantum Gravity
    Space time singularities are impossible
    For the same reason we don't see
    The ultraviolet divergence in Black Bodies
    That is the parameters of interest,
    In this case space and time, are quantified.

    In addition, LQG predicts a bounce
    Under extreme contraction,
    Resulting in the foliation of a new Universe.

    As we shall see, the same basic prediction
    Emerges from M-Theory/ String theory.

    In this post we will look at, in very broad terms,
    A proposal by M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano
    Which makes this prediction.

    We shall also explore the possible implications
    Of this based on the expanded particle states
    Predicted by Bob Klauber, myself and others.

    The proposal put forward by Gasperini and Veneziano
    Is based on the principle of Scale Factor Duality
    Which is a basic reformulation of T Duality,
    A symmetry useful in unifying
    Various versions of String Theory.

    Scale factor Duality was first proposed by Veneziano,
    Who expanded on the work of Robert Brandenberger
    And Cumrun Vafa on the cosmological implications of T Duality.

    An important parameter in String Theory
    Is the String scale parameter, known as alphaprime.
    This is so named because the Scalar field,
    The Dilaton, ( Graviscalar) that sets this scale
    Is coupled to the Electromagnetic field,
    Which sets the basic string scale.

    So in terms of the Planck scale we have;

    G*M_plk^2*alpha/(hbar*c)= G*M_str^2/(hbar*c)


    M_str= M_plk*sqrt[alpha]= approx M_plk/ 11.7

    L_stg= approx 11.7*L_plk = sqrt[alphaprime]

    In string theory there are two
    Fundamental oscillation modes for strings,
    Vibration mode where the string exists unbound in space
    And winding modes where the Strin
    Is wound around the compact dimension.

    However, in actuality these string modes
    Are dual to each other.
    This removes the distinction between
    Compact Dimension and large Dimension.
    The energy of this string modes are given by;


    E_vib= N/R & E_w= N* R/Alphaprime.


    Therefore in one regime
    (I will expand on what regime means in due time)
    We have;


    a= hbar*c*Alphaprime/2*R' + hbar*c*R/2 = 1/R +R


    And in the Dual regime

    a'= hbar*c*R'/2 + hbar*c*alphaprime/2*R = R +1/R


    Although T Duality is usually described
    In terms of cylindrical spaces,
    Which one dimension is finite,
    A variant of it applies
    To our ordinary three dimensions,
    As demonstrated by Veneziano.

    One must be careful about talking about
    The expansion of an infinite space.
    Its overall size cannot change,
    It remains infinite,
    But it can still expand in the sense
    That bodies imbedded within it
    Move away from each other.

    The crucial variable in the well know scale factor.
    Based on T Duality,
    Universes with large scale factors
    Are equivalent to Universe with small scale factors.

    For years String theorists thought that T duality
    Only applied to closed strings
    As opposed to open strings.

    But as Demonstrated by Polchinsky,
    T duality applies to Open Strings,
    Based on the Dirchlet Boundary
    Condition of Membranes.

    In M Theory Open Strings have their end points
    (where their charges reside)
    On special Branes call D-Branes.
    In effect, open Strings
    Are completely dual to closed strings.

    One observer’s open string
    Is another observer’s closed string.
    (Of course Strings can't really be observed)
    Veneziano realized that this allowed
    The generalization of T Duality
    Into scale factor Duality.
    Therefore we can write;


    a= hbar*c*R'/2

    a'= hbar*c*alphaprime/2*R


    The special insight of Gasperini and Veneziano
    Was that these equations described
    The relationship of cosmic time
    To the scale factor.

    As in well known in String theory
    A contracting space for a vibration mode string
    Is an expanding mode for a winding string.
    And given the perfect duality
    Of these string modes,
    These equations were in fact describing
    Two time reversed Universes.
    Therefore the following transforms became true,
    Based on String theory;


    T*a to 1/a'

    T*a(t) = a'(-t)


    This means that Dual to every contraction
    To an apparent Singularity exists
    A new expanding Universe,
    Foliating its own space time.

    And likewise,
    Dual to the expansion
    Of our own Universe
    Is a contracting Universe.

    This would also apply to Black Holes.
    Inside an event horizon
    We find that space and time swap roles.

    The expected Singularity at the center
    Of a black hole is really a point in time.
    Our own Universe might have been born
    In the interior of a black hole.

    However, while a bit mind boggling
    It must be kept in mind that in
    This scenario every Big Bang Expansion
    Based on Scale Factor Duality
    Must have a twin contracting Universe,
    A Universe from its past.

    What else can we say about the relationship
    Of these dual time reversed Universes?
    To answer this question we will see how
    The expanded particle states mentioned earlier
    Might relate to this question.


    While not generally acknowledged
    In most QFT text books,
    The relativistic, Klein-Gordon,
    The Proca, the Dirac and the Dirac-like
    Spin 3/2 equations have well defined
    Negative frequency solutions.

    These "extra" solutions,
    Hereafter called the Supplemental solutions
    (As opposed to the Traditional solutions)
    Are generally ignored in QFT.

    The reason for this, as pointed out by Pauli,
    Is that these solutions cannot relate
    To any real physical particle.

    A QFT not bound from below is pure nonsense.

    However, in recent years,
    These "unphysical" solutions have been revived
    And applied to the Zero Point Energy problem
    And to the possibility of Time Reversed Universes
    Created at the Big Bang.

    Sakharov, Linde, Klauber, Moffat,
    Sundrum and Randel, T'Hooft,
    Myself as well as others
    Have proposed various models
    Which attempt to incorporate
    These extra solutions,
    While still keeping QFT
    Safely bound from below.

    It is beyond the scope of this post
    To go into detail on this.
    This topic has been well covered
    In previous posts.
    Of course it is far from certain
    That any of these efforts
    Make a convincing argument.


    Nevertheless, we shall proceed
    And see how these supplemental solutions
    Possibly relate to the Gasperini-Veneziano proposal.

    For simplicity I write the Scalar Field equation in natural units.


    (&_mu&^mu+mu^2)*phi=0

    Where & means partial derivative.

    From this is trivial to see that we have the solutions;

    psi= exp[-i*(w*t-k*x)

    psi= exp[ i*(w*t-k*x)


    However, in addition we have another set of solutions.


    psi=exp[-i*(w*t +k*x)


    psi= exp[i*(w*t+k*x)


    Note while these don't appear covariant
    A different sign conventions reveals that they in fact are.


    We can write this expanded particle state in a very beautiful symmetry.


    c=1

    t_0=1

    E=gamma*m

    p=gamma*m*v

    gamma= E/m

    tau=t/gamma

    t=m/E

    v= P/E

    S=v*t

    Traditional States

    *********************************

    +S +T Quadrant

    MATTER w(+) & k(+) (Positive Energy into Future)


    t (+)= m(+)/E(+)

    v (+)=P(+)/E(+)

    gamma (+) = E(+)/m(+)

    E (+) = gamma (+)*m (+)

    p (+) =gamma(+)*m(+)*v(+)

    S(+)=v(+)*t(+)

    **************************************************
    -S -T Quadrant

    ANTI MATTER w (-) k (-) (Negative energy into past)


    t(-)= m(+)/E(-)

    v (+)=P(-)/E(-)

    gamma (-) = E(-)/m(+)

    E (-) = gamma (-)*m (+)

    p (-) =gamma(-)*m(+)*v(+)

    S(-) = v(+)*t(-)


    SUPPLEMENTAL STATES

    ************************************************** ********

    -S +T Quadrant

    NEGATIVE MATTER w (-) k (+) (Negative Energy into future)


    t (+)= m (-)/E (-)

    v (-)=P(+))/E(-)

    gamma (+) = E(-)/m(-)

    E (-) = gamma (+)*m (-)

    p (+) =gamma(+)*m(-)*v(-)

    S (-) = v (-)*t (+)

    **********************************************

    +S -T Quadrant

    NEGATIVE ANTI MATTER w (+) k (-) (Positive energy into past)

    t (-) = m(-)/E(+)

    v (-)=P(-)/E(+)

    gamma (-) = E(+)/m(-)

    E (+) = gamma (-)*m (-)

    p (-) =gamma(-)*m(-)*v(-)

    S (+) =v (-)*t (-)


    **************************************


    In essence we describe these four particle state
    In terms of energy flow through time.

    So we have;


    Matter { +E +t}

    Antimatter { -E -t} Reinterpreted to {+E +t } all charges reversed


    Negative Matter {- E + t}


    Negative antimatter {+E -t} Reinterpreted {-E +t }



    From this it should be obvious
    Why Anti Matter Particles are physical
    And the supplemental particles are not.

    (to be con't)

  2. #6792
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,531
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,755
    Thanked 3,866x in 2,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: An Idea

    However, the basic premise of Klauber and myself are
    That these supplemental particles "exist"
    In the sense that they form a constituent
    Of the virtual processes of QFT.

    ( All the models make traditional
    And supplemental particles
    Invisible to each other
    Except for momentum transfer
    And gravity effects)

    When this full set of particle solutions
    Are included this way it would appear
    That the total energy of the Universe is zero,
    A Zero Sum Universe.

    This makes sense since the creation
    Of baby Universes never results in
    A mass energy conservation violation
    In the mother Universe
    Whether they are created
    By Black Holes or Quantum fluctuations.

    However, the supplemental particles
    Can exist as real particles
    In the time reversed Universe
    While the Traditional particles
    Can only exist as virtual particles
    In this same time reversed Universe,
    And visa versa.

    So we have;

    Universe (+T)

    Real

    Matter {+E+t) Antimatter {-E-t} >>>> {+E+t}

    Virtual

    Matter {+E+t) Antimatter {-E-t} >>>> {+E+t}

    Negative Matter { -E +t} Negative Anti Matter { +E -t} >>> { -E+t}


    Universe (-T)

    Real
    Negative Matter ( -E +t} >>>> {+E -t} Negative Anti Matter { +E -t}

    Virtual

    Negative Matter ( -E +t} >>>> {+E -t} Negative Anti Matter { +E -t}

    Matter {+E+t) >>>> { +E-t} Antimatter {-E--t}



    Assuming a similar CP violation process
    In both Mirror Universes we would expect
    The selection of


    +T Universe Matter (Negative Matter in -T Universe)

    -T Universe Negative Anti Matter (Anti Matter in the +T Universe)


    As the predominate states of real matter.
    ( Since we have no understanding of where CP violation
    Comes from this is the purest handwaving argument)


    Based on this we see that we have a BIVERSE where;


    psi= C*{ exp[i*S]+exp[-i*S]}

    With

    S = N*Integral d^4x(+t)d^4x(-t) sqrt [g(+t)]*sqrt[g(-t)] X[ M_plk^2/(16*pi)]*R(+t) +L( phi(+t)) - { M_plk^2/(16*pi)]*R(+t) +L( phi(+t)) }


    All of this is based on a fair amount of handwaving
    And reliance on theoretical models
    That are far from being anything
    Like established physics.

    So this is all highly speculative.
    In truth the behavior of string theory
    At the Planck scale
    Is not as confidently known
    As this post might suggest.

    And the veracity of the expanded particle states
    Must be viewed a conjecture.
    Nevertheless, I think this in an interesting conjecture,
    Especially in light of the fact that once again
    A cosmological proposal contains a BIVERSE solution.


    4-leaf clover
    Last edited by leskey; 03-13-2010 at 08:22 PM. Reason: typo

  3. #6793
    Grandmaster G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,684
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,381
    Thanked 1,582x in 1,125 Posts
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: An Idea

    for u max, a prior post you made? ... its a long one for educational purposes ... very interesting ... kind regards graham
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klDU0...eature=channel
    Max Planck, said that “all matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration which holds the atom together. We must assume behind this force is the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.

    and ....from an old master ... Ancora impara!

  4. #6794
    Moderator leskey has much to be proud of leskey has much to be proud of leskey has much to be proud of leskey has much to be proud of leskey has much to be proud of leskey has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,463
    Thanks Given
    1,762
    Thanked 770x in 403 Posts
    Rep Power
    44

    Re: An Idea

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikal View Post
    IThe Haggadah states…
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikal View Post
    “The light created at the very beginning is not the same as the light emitted by the Sun, the Moon and the stars, which appeared only on the fourth day. But let me tell you, there’s a different light. The light of the first day was of a sort that would have enabled man to see the world at a glance from one end to the other. Anticipating the wickedness of the sinful generations of the deluge and the Tower of Babel, who were unworthy to enjoy the blessings of such light, God concealed it, but in the world to come it will appear to the pious in all its pristine glory.”
    (Apologies for the theological terms as no wish to offend, Haisch views the legend as an allegorical story, it was the passage itself that Haisch found stunning)

    ...the most fundamental property of matter—inertia.
    Rueda’s derivation was that mass becomes, in effect an illusion. Matter resists acceleration, not because it possesses some innate property called mass, as Newton postulated, but because the zero-point field exerts a force whenever acceleration takes place. To put it in somewhat metaphysical terms, there exists a background sea of quantum light (the electromagnetic zero-point field) filling the universe, and that light generates a force that opposes acceleration when you push on any material object. The action of that quantum light is what makes matter the seemingly solid, stable stuff of which we and our world are made. Haisch and Rueda together created a scientific paper called, “Inertia as a zero-point field Lorenz force” which in the scientific community was accepted, criticized and even praised. Together these two scientists, through a NASA funded grant are working on a hypothesis of the Law of Inertia.

    Haisch views all ancient esoteric writings on creation as implicating “light” as a key to the creation process and references equivalent to the modern reference to electromagnetic fields and forms of electromagnetic radiation. This is explained quite in-depth in his book which I will not quote here.

    The book essentially references the possibility that all references to “light” is to an entirely different universal light radiation that does not originate in the sun, the moon or the stars, but rather in the electromagnetic zero-point field that may be involved in the origin of the properties of matter in a fundamental way. He states there is a clue here—an insight into the creation process itself.
    Hi, Pat.

    It's been a while since I've posted in your thread. From the prespective of someone who sees parallels between the cosmos and living cells, a couple of terms stood out in Mikal's post...I'll endeavour to be coherent.

    From some recent reading, I'm wondering if the zero-point field could be viewed as a resonant cavity of microwave plasma...a perpetually contained alternating electromotive flow (gravitation wave?) of the aetherial 'sea' within, resulting in ratios of pressure to volume displacement (tension) along an axial plane of electrodynamic interface. Resultant tensions rupture the membrane causing nucleation and growth of galaxies (perhaps, similar to the the interruptions and punctuations to the flow of consciousness as it receives and consequentlhy perceives sensory input and creates its own 'reality' of and in time).

    Phosphorous is a key component of proteins in DNA replication. Further drawing from phospholipids in cell biology, the theorised 'light' of the zero-point field may be attributable to a universal background phosphorescence.

    Is it correct to say light/electro-magnetism is copolymerization?

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1022154644.htm

    Dr. Benoit Famaey (Universities of Bonn and Strasbourg) explains: "The dark matter seems to 'know' how the visible matter is distributed. They seem to conspire with each other such that the gravity of the visible matter at the characteristic radius of the dark halo is always the same. This is extremely surprising since one would rather expect the balance between visible and dark matter to strongly depend on the individual history of each galaxy."

    ...Dr Famaey added, "If we account for our observations with a modified law of gravity, it makes perfect sense to replace the effective action of hypothetical dark matter with a force closely related to the distribution of visible matter."


    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0422121220.htm

    Farrah's finding that distant ULIRGs are linked with large clumps of dark matter was surprising for another reason. As its name suggests, dark matter doesn't emit light so no conventional telescope can see it. However, because dark matter has mass, its existence can be inferred by the way stars are drawn to regions where this mysterious mass is concentrated.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0131094056.htm

    In Dr Zhao's model, dark energy and dark matter are simply different manifestations of the same thing, which he has considered as a 'dark fluid'. On the scale of galaxies, this dark fluid behaves like matter and on the scale of the Universe overall as dark energy, driving the expansion of the Universe. Importantly, his model, unlike some similar work, is detailed enough to produce the same 3:1 ratio of dark energy to dark matter as is predicted by cosmologists.

    Beginnings and endings in a new 'light' - ENJOY!
    But nothing's lost. Or else: all is translation And every bit of us is lost in it... - James Merrill

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to leskey For This Useful Post:

    G_burnett (03-13-2010), Mikal (03-13-2010), Profpat (03-13-2010)

  6. #6795
    Grandmaster Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,048x in 745 Posts
    Rep Power
    104

    Re: An Idea

    Thanks for your post and the links leskey. I like your metaphor of comparing the universe to a living cell.

    Best,

    Pat

    A Brain Cell is the Same as the Universe
    Physicists discover that the structure of a brain cell is the same as the entire universe. "Oh God, guide me, protect me; make of me a shining lamp and a ...
    sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/pc/brain-universe.html - Cached

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Profpat For This Useful Post:

    leskey (03-13-2010), Mikal (03-13-2010)

  8. #6796
    Grandmaster Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute Mikal has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,465
    Thanks Given
    2,097
    Thanked 1,816x in 1,148 Posts
    Rep Power
    101

    Re: An Idea

    Hi Lesk…your comments are in agreement with the 30 years of study by J. S. Gordon who also sees parallels between the cosmos and living cells.

    He states the “aether” or “quantum fluid” or “zero-point energy” is an ethereally plasmic medium.
    He states, “the quantum fluid might perhaps be regarded as the terrestrial equivalent of the astrophysicists “Dark Matter of Space”—the quantum fluid, the homogenous substratum of all the earths gases, liquids and minerals (hold the celestial bodies of the galaxies in thrall) it holds the various forms of planetary matter together. It is their very source, their nemesis, a literal reservoir of life force which both gives life and takes it away—all in due season.
    It is the medium the animal and plant kingdom’s instincts react to when volcanic or earthquake activity is immanent—just as it is the source of telepathic transmissions, sixth sense, electricity and electromagnetism in general.
    Now here is an interesting comment—“Modern man because of the use of his mind and imagination—actually DE-SENSITIZE themselves to the planetary medium whereas the aboriginal natives do not need to intellectualize their experience, they thus avoid the problem. Although this fluid medium is thought of as spiritual in nature, it is in fact a merely psychic substratum of existence. The mystery of this substratum (the aether) and its sympathetically associated related properties concerns the universal sympathetic association, forces of attraction and repulsion plus an understanding of how to bring them together or separate them.
    Gordon states, “Our planet is a relatively solid body. It mimics the solar system by having a central generator, also an outer crystal shell (the EM charged ionosphere) which expands and contracts in response to the photoelectric energies emanating from the sun (response in the earths core—gravity) the inference that the earth’s core is not solid or near solid metal but instead one might suggest, THE HIGHLY ENERGISED AND CONCENTRATED BALL OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PLASMA, it was from the outset, now concealed by the planetary mantle, undoubtedly rotating upon its own axis and itself capable of responsively cyclical expansion and contraction.”

    Concerning gravity and levity he states—the nature of gravity and levity might be defined from one viewpoint as the negatively charged products of the energies emanating from the core and ionosphere, WHEN RETURNING TO THEM, with the planets lower atmosphere being the “zone of interactions which is why gravity is called the weak force and levity not even recognized. However, both of them fluctuate according to the voltage, or electrical pressure in the outer field the ionosphere—the electricity in each being of different quality. But what medium actually connects or correlates these energies since they certainly do not function in a vacuum?
    The answer is the aether, the astral light, the quantum field!”

    Again a notation that levity is forgotten, discarded, not recognized. Now you guys would have more understanding here than me so what is all this late preoccupation with levity??

    (Just for you Prof….don’t worry God fits into this mystery…smiles..)

    Regards Mikal
    If I see a train coming and your on the track...if I don't tell you, it will be a pity for you and a shame on me....

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Mikal For This Useful Post:

    leskey (03-13-2010)

  10. #6797
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,531
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,755
    Thanked 3,866x in 2,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: An Idea

    We have found the TAO
    That gives rise to the now,
    And why superpositions collapse,
    Due to gravity, perhaps;

    So, who would like to know
    How the prime numbers grow?

    It’s the greatest secret ever kept
    But I know its concept.

  11. #6798
    Grandmaster Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,048x in 745 Posts
    Rep Power
    104

    Re: An Idea

    Outside of earth and water how do they grow?

  12. #6799
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,531
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,755
    Thanked 3,866x in 2,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: An Idea

    Quote Originally Posted by Profpat View Post
    Outside of earth and water how do they grow?
    You have to pay a dollar to find out.

  13. #6800
    Grandmaster Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,048x in 745 Posts
    Rep Power
    104

    Re: An Idea

    Quote Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com View Post


    You have to pay a dollar to find out.
    American, Canadian or Hong Kong?


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. An Idea that became a cosmos
    By mkirkpatrick in forum Metaphysics
    Replies: 682
    Last Post: 11-02-2011, 06:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top