That explains that image Neutralino. So with a black hole wouldn't it attract all massive objects in ALL directions, and therefor not be a hole but a something I'm not sure how to describe.
That explains that image Neutralino. So with a black hole wouldn't it attract all massive objects in ALL directions, and therefor not be a hole but a something I'm not sure how to describe.
Best,
Pat
Yes, think of a black hole in the same way you would think of a star-- a sphere-- but just very very dense. Now, if you go back to that image, imagine that we live in a 2d spacial universe (the flat sheet of rubber) that has a black hole at the point in the middle. The black hole causes the space to curve. So, as you can see from the diagram, no matter where you are around the outside of the black hole, the space is curved in the same manner. So, any object approaching the black hole from any direction (remembering that we are in 2D so you can only come from back-front or left-right) will have its path changed due to the curvature of the space; i.e. it will be affected by the gravity of the black hole.
I hope this makes sense!!
__________________ ~neutralino
If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.
There is nothing less than the Planck length, which is simply the smallest measurement that can be made. It is not something that exists as matter or anything else, thus, it has no gaps.
I think the gaps you've omitted can serve as the basis for quantum gravity, Felix. If there were no gaps they wouldn't be called planck lengths, and we can use these gaps to set the cumulative gravitational effect of planck mass which results in the "c" constant.
We have the same glue. It comes with a statutory warning ' Doesnt mend broken hearts and broken families'
You're right Dipayankar it doesn't.
In fact I eminated the 8 gluons from my Idea. I didn't need them. The 8 colors can all be represented on the quark areas directly. And I didn't need the gluons to bind the 3 quarks. I did it by superposing and interweaving them.
Hi everyone: I saw a great one minute video at ( 7 wonders of the world.wmv ) Sorry I couldn't url it. You'll be able to find it if you do a search for the above.
Best to all,
Pat
Last edited by Profpat; 02-20-2008 at 06:55 PM.
Reason: changed message url didn't work
Great work Prof. These exotic particles are sometimes just proposed to satisfy someones ideas. They may not exist in reality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat
You're right Dipayankar it doesn't.
In fact I eminated the 8 gluons from my Idea. I didn't need them. The 8 colors can all be represented on the quark areas directly. And I didn't need the gluons to bind the 3 quarks. I did it by superposing and interweaving them.
I think the gaps you've omitted can serve as the basis for quantum gravity, Felix. If there were no gaps they wouldn't be called planck lengths, and we can use these gaps to set the cumulative gravitational effect of planck mass which results in the "c" constant.
Sorry Nobody, it's not like that. The Planck length is not an object - it does not exist and therefore has no gaps. It is simply the shortest measurement that you can make and is fundamental to QM but not part of the structure.
I have a suspicion that there is something wrong with the Planck mass as it's many orders of magnitude bigger than common sense would suggest from the size of the other Planck units.
Hi everyone: I saw a great one minute video at ( 7 wonders of the world.wmv ) Sorry I couldn't url it. You'll be able to find it if you do a search for the above.
Plank length does provide us with a limitation. But if we believe in string theory, then would a string be longer than a Plank Length? If yes, then there might be something else smaller than a string and hence more fundamental..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger
Sorry Nobody, it's not like that. The Planck length is not an object - it does not exist and therefore has no gaps. It is simply the shortest measurement that you can make and is fundamental to QM but not part of the structure.
I have a suspicion that there is something wrong with the Planck mass as it's many orders of magnitude bigger than common sense would suggest from the size of the other Planck units.
Linear Mode
