An Idea

[Profpat]

So far not much Dipayankar;

Several important achievements in particle physics have been made during experiments at CERN. These include, but are not limited to:

• 1973: The discovery of neutral currents in the Gargamelle bubble chamber.
• 1983: The discovery of W and Z bosons in the UA1 and UA2 experiments.
• 1989: The determination of the number of neutrino families at the Large Electron Positron Collider (LEP) operating on the Z boson peak.
• 1995: The first creation of antihydrogen atoms in the PS210 experiment.
• 2001: The discovery of direct CP-violation in the NA48 experiments.

I guess the accelerators would have to be a whole lot larger than CERN to reap any really good results. Like hundreds or even thousands miles in circumference. Not to economically feasible for any time in the future. But who knows, I believe it is the largest accelerator and may be for some time since the USA gave up on its ~ 60 mile super accelerator that was going to be constructed in Texas. So its the best we have for the time being.

Quite honestly I'm not sure if the money is better spent on outer space, i.e Hubble, NASA, Skylab. or inner space ( accelerators ).

Where do you think the scarce resource dollars ( Euros ) should be spent?

Best,

Pat

[dipayankar]

No idea Prof... maybe the asian countries might pool in some resource..

So far not much Dipayankar;

Several important achievements in particle physics have been made during experiments at CERN. These include, but are not limited to:

• 1973: The discovery of neutral currents in the Gargamelle bubble chamber.
• 1983: The discovery of W and Z bosons in the UA1 and UA2 experiments.
• 1989: The determination of the number of neutrino families at the Large Electron Positron Collider (LEP) operating on the Z boson peak.
• 1995: The first creation of antihydrogen atoms in the PS210 experiment.
• 2001: The discovery of direct CP-violation in the NA48 experiments.

I guess the accelerators would have to be a whole lot larger than CERN to reap any really good results. Like hundreds or even thousands miles in circumference. Not to economically feasible for any time in the future. But who knows, I believe it is the largest accelerator and may be for some time since the USA gave up on its ~ 60 mile super accelerator that was going to be constructed in Texas. So its the best we have for the time being.

Quite honestly I'm not sure if the money is better spent on outer space, i.e Hubble, NASA, Skylab. or inner space ( accelerators ).

Where do you think the scarce resource dollars ( Euros ) should be spent?

Best,

Pat

[Felix Schrodinger]

I eliminated the need for gluons by binding the quarks directly together by superposing and interweaving them and giving them the color force directly.

Amen to that

Also I believe the strong nuclear force is accomplished by the electro/magnetic force.

Not sure how you see this working?
Felix

[Profpat]

No idea Prof... maybe the asian countries might pool in some resource..

Hi Dipayankar;

Good idea you have. Maybe China and India and Japan could construct an accelerator connecting their countries. That should be large enough.

It was good having a real time chat with you and the others yesterday. You asked some really good questions.

I was thinking when I said that strings were made of energy that maybe that is the secret. In other words it's not mass that came first nor energy but rather they came simultaneously together. Energy compacted into the smallest amount of mass, the one dimensional Planck length string.

What are your thoughts?

Best,

Pat

[Profpat]

Amen to that



Not sure how you see this working?
Felix

Hi Felix;

Good to hear from you again. Too bad you didn't join us in the chat room yesterday, you would have loved playing with the strings.

If you look at the above posts which show the octants, either cube or better the spherical image, you'll see the 8 seperate areas. Each one of those seperate areas would be a positive or a negative charge, cooresponding to the mathematical positive or negative areas of the octant. I view a positive area on one particle being able to bond with a negative area on another particle. This would be the EM force bonding the particles together. It would explain the strong nuclear force and also the weak nuclear force in that there would be a limit to this type of bonding, before break down into alpha particle emission.

Best to you,

Pat

[Profpat]

I BELIEVE GOD DOES PLAY DICE WITH THE UNIVERSE!



The above is the probability pattern for throwing any number in craps. With enough tosses that pattern will manifest itself, even though a throw of the dice could yield any number.

It's my belief that this is how quantum physics can be reconciled with Newtonian physics. At the atomic or subatomic level anything is possible but once enough events occur than a hard and fast pattern evolves, which you can put money on, and the casinos do.

Best to all,

Pat

[dipayankar]

You are right. At a subatomic level probability works best..

I BELIEVE GOD DOES PLAY DICE WITH THE UNIVERSE!



The above is the probability pattern for throwing any number in craps. With enough tosses that pattern will manifest itself, even though a throw of the dice could yield any number.

It's my belief that this is how quantum physics can be reconciled with Newtonian physics. At the atomic or subatomic level anything is possible but once enough events occur than a hard and fast pattern evolves, which you can put money on, and the casinos do.

Best to all,

Pat

[Profpat]

You are right. At a subatomic level probability works best..

Hi Dipayankar;

I agree with you probability theory probably rules the sub-atomic world. This would explain the uncertainty principle, degrees of freedom and asymptotic f
freedom. Once the atoms combine to form a real substance like a grain of sand then there is a balancing of forces and classical Newtonian physics rule. Deterministic physics.

Best,

Pat

[Profpat]

Once again I believe further evidence as to why an electron is a projection ( ripple or field ) emitted from the proton.

It is currently necessary to use quantum mechanics to understand the behavior of systems at atomic length scales and smaller. For example, if Newtonian mechanics governed the workings of an atom, electrons would rapidly travel towards and collide with the nucleus. However, in the natural world the electrons normally remain in an unknown orbital path around the nucleus, defying classical electromagnetism.

HMMM!! Our little electron defying classical electromagnetism.

Best to all,

Pat

[dipayankar]

Hi Prof.. since you believe in String Theory, can you give me a co-relation between a string and a photon?

Hi Dipayankar;

I agree with you probability theory probably rules the sub-atomic world. This would explain the uncertainty principle, degrees of freedom and asymptotic f
freedom. Once the atoms combine to form a real substance like a grain of sand then there is a balancing of forces and classical Newtonian physics rule. Deterministic physics.

Best,

Pat