Profpat, if we take the time derivative with your structures then we produce dynamic structures. If we take the time derivative again we get a quantum theory of spacetime.
Profpat, if we take the time derivative with your structures then we produce dynamic structures. If we take the time derivative again we get a quantum theory of spacetime.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Profpat (08-02-2010)
Dynamic structures…
Profpat (08-02-2010)
Seeing how three quarks, each with there own specific complementary opposite quark, each with an equal chance of sending "THEIR" charge. In the long run, they each account for about 1/3 of the total charges. Many, many, many gluons the force carrying charge are produced, one for each charge transaction. It's beginning to sound like an excellent accounting/information system. The inner dynamic would appear to be total constant chaos, yet everyone of those action/reaction charges would have produced a gluon the force carrying charge. The order a predictive pattern where 3 quarks are confined with asymptotic freedom. Much energy and activity produced by the quarks which are within the spherical pattern of the proton/neutron.
This takes it beyond the simple + - of QED and now we must understand a dynamical color force QCD. Now it's the trinity of forces and their complementary opposing force, that determines our quantum world. The summation of a proton in "happy harmony" is greater than the summation of those 3 quarks, not in "happy harmony"
Best,
Pat
Oh no! the photons are coming, or are those lines? Nope, lines don't have color.
An unusual combination of a variety of conditions brings about a dramatic spectacle. The Yosemite fire waterfall. Nature is ever fascinating in her displays.
More pictures and the story at this link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2551514/posts
So many paths to the same destination,
would, but I could, experience them all...
My concept can show how the six face charges can account for color chromo electro- dynamics for up-quarks bonding to down-quarks by face charges being fixed in alignment with a space coordinate. I get a 11/18 chance for + and - face charge bonding -- and it's much more rational than assuming camalfladging or whatever to get a 2/3 chance for bonding. After all 2/3 is 12/18, I'm off only off 1/18 -- maybe the 2/3 figure has a margin of error. I can't think of a clearer way of showing a physical occurance for this chance for bonding. The concept also shows how mass occurs in quarks and leptons, inertia, electrostatic charge and electrodynamic vortexes at each face of the core in a basic comprehensive way.
Can you explain the mechanics of chromo electro dynamics with you theory? What physically is causing this bonding action?
Profpat (08-02-2010)
That picture of Yosemite is breath taking -- it looks like lava flowing down a cliff.
labelwench (08-03-2010)
Hi lw;
thanks for bringing me back to the "Big Picture". It's amazing how nature can take those bits of matter and fashion them into what is beautiful.
Best,
Pat
Bogie (11-16-2010), labelwench (08-03-2010)
The spectrum graph seems to show the compaction in a given Planck quantum length. A Planck length is 10^-33 and I would like to know the limit of compaction of the sign curve in a Planck quantum length. It would imply the probability wave energy intensity that the medium can handle to propagate the wave. If my concept is correct then the components that give direction to light (x^2 + y^2 + z^2) have reached a limit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)