[Profpat]

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger Hi Profpat Talking (as you were) of Trinities - you forgot the most important - Brahmah, Shiva and Vishnu. Without Brahmah there is no space; without Shiva there is no time hence motion. regards Felix

And what is Vishnu doing, writing the Gita?

And once you start that you have Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. That cooresponding to Father Time, the Body of Christ, and the Spirit.

Time being the MIND; space being the BODY; and motion being the SPIRIT.

I'll comment on your last post, when I wake up more from my nap.

Best,

Pat

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger Hi Profpat I don't quite agree with this. IMHO time and space are absolute. Motion is the movement of matter through space at a rate controlled by time. Time is not 'associated' with spatial change and motion - it controls motion. I agree that the SPACE/TIME INTERVAL is absolute which makes them both absolute. regards Felix

OK my brain cells are now caffeinated, so I can now respond.

If I read your comment right you don't believe in Einstein's Special Relativity Theory.

The formula for Distance is Rate X Time, are you saying D=2T? ( i.e. motion and time are the same )

I view the space/time interval to be absolute not space or time.

Consider The Pythagorean Theorm; A2 + B2 = C2
Let's say the diagonal line C is absolute, and that it is connected to the vertical line A which is space and the horizontal line which is time, or vice versa.
You cann move the diagonal line up the Y axis, thus making the X axis shorter. Or you can move the diagonal line across the X axis thus making the Y axis shorter or longer. What is absolute here is the interval the diagonal line, the other 2 lines are not absolute but rather relative depending on the placement of the diagonal line.

I need more coffee.

[dipayankar]

And Prof. the male would have felt threatened if the female would have rich. Their bragging would have stopped...

Originally Posted by Profpat True enough Dipayankar, but I have a feeling if I asked the male students the same question regarding girls, they would have stopped at the first. Who is the best looking. Best, Pat

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by dipayankar In terms of Humans I would like to refine your trinity to Heart, Brain and the Neural System...

It's a little more specific than I would use, but the concept is the same.

Best to you sir,

Pat

[KiGs]

I would use just the body. The body includes the brain which produces consciousness and emotion. So my symbol would be a dark looming circle called, "The One."



Keanu Reeves reference makes my idea 100% irrefutable.

[Profpat]

Originally Posted by dipayankar And Prof. the male would have felt threatened if the female would have rich. Their bragging would have stopped...

Hi Dipayankar;

If you were to set up a friend on a blind date, a womans first question would probably be; " What does he do for a living? " The mans first question would probably be; " What does she look like? "

Viva la difference. Yin/Yang eternally onward.

Best,

Pat

[Profpat]

OK KiGs how about this for human trinity.

Your body, my body, everybodies body, is made up of a trinity of interactions, namely positive, negative and neutral. This is the P, Proton +, the E, Electron -, and the N, Neutron 0.

Thus proving that the PENis mighter than the sword.

Best to you,

Pat

[Felix Schrodinger]

Originally Posted by Profpat If I read your comment right you don't believe in Einstein's Special Relativity Theory.

Hi Profpat

Yes to Relativity - both General and Lorentzian but not Einstein's Special.

If you want justification for this please look back at the posts as you provided the link which convinced me that this was the right path.

regards
Felix

[Profpat]

"Special Relativity": The strongest direct evidence comes probably from particle accelerators, in which subatomic particles such as electrons and positrons are accelerated to within a few inches per second of the speed of light. We can observe very clearly and accurately the changes in, for instance, the apparent masses of the particles. They are observed to increase dramatically, and in fact new and much heavier particles can be created by making counter-rotating beams of, say, electrons and positrons, collide head-on with each other. Special relativity has played a key role in the design and operation of particle accelerators for many decades.

Hi Felix;

The above is from the Goddard Space Flight Center. While both the big bang and SR are theories there is pretty good evidence for both. SR also had the experiment where clocks ran different, when accelerated, as predicted by the theory.

But, needless to say, you are entitled to your own theories.

Best to you Felix,

Pat

[Felix Schrodinger]

Originally Posted by Profpat But, needless to say, you are entitled to your own theories.

Hi Pat

SR describes the way things are to observers and relates that to their relative motion. As a result of its acceptance, the prefered frame of reference was rejected. LR is more intune with a theory which includes an absolute background.

My TOE (http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-th...nce-shiva.html) brings together quantum gravity (as in GR), wave particle duality, plus the strong and weak forces; can you show me how SR does this?

regards
Felix

PS - I am still working on electro magnetism