Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 101 to 107 of 107
  1. #101
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,090
    Blog Entries
    130
    Thanks Given
    1,678
    Thanked 861x in 483 Posts
    Rep Power
    43

    Awards Showcase

    Re: Cyclical Universe based on Big Rip Scenario

    Dear dipayankar & Nobody:

    Don't know that a higher compliment has ever been directed at my work, which amounts to an unprecedented assemblage and recognition of the works of others, especially Einstein... Albeit, this (below) is excerpted from chapter one, in response to dipayankar's question about gravity (on or near major gravitational coordinate systems).
    __________________________________________________ ______

    The formula is exactly as simple as it is inescapable. Einstein's GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY equates gravity with acceleration. Einstein's 4th Dimension demands overall right-angle motion of the Three recognized Dimensions Of Space: in one of two possible 4-Dimensional directions (Overall expansion or overall contraction).
    Since objects do not fall 'upward' and away from 3-D Matter, this rules out overall 4-Dimensional contraction.
    Objects do fall 'downward' toward the center of 3-D Matter; therefore confirming by demonstration, in situ (as is): a physically (materially) expanding Universe. The unrecognized causal identity (the source) of the observed, measured, acknowledged, recognized spatially expanding universe.


    Image-3.gif Picture by Txpoet 714 x 303 (90 kb) ShowHide Exif Data


    The conclusion is without precedent - although it has many historically noted revolutionary counterparts and parallels, in the history of Western Science. Recognizing the four dimensional space time continuum as being gravity, and conversely, is and has been patently unavoidable since its remarkably progressive advent; for the reasons provided herein (Refer to Drawing 1 Illustrations 3 & 4)

    The material as well as spatial Universe is 4-Dimensionally expanding; it is this 4-Dimensional accelerating expansion that generates the force experienced and recognized as gravity. Hence objects do not fall to earth; the earth - instead - accelerates upwardly and overtakes them (just as the floor does in Einstein's elevator). Gravity is the 4-D space-time Dimension.




    'Center point mass'.

    4-D accelerating expansion to macrocosmic infinity.

    The same quantity of energy, distributed over an ever increasing space, squared.
    (Without infringement on the law of conservation of mass-energy.)

    This perspective anticipates a return of the abandoned Steady State universe.
    Discarding any need for the 'spontanous creation of Hydrogen' to compensate for what would otherwise be the decreased density of the overall universe.

    Whereas, 'cosmic background radiation' is the signature of any expanding universe scenario, where earlier eras of the expanding universe were inevitably more dense.

    In the proposed interpretation of matter as a continuously expanding field, there is no 'big bang', 'big crunch', or 'big rip'. The materially and spatially expanding universe maintains the same relative density, from the infinite past to the infinite future, ergo: 'Steady State'.

    Kind regards,
    - RP
    (George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

    "All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
    "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
    "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid

  2. #102
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,131
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanked 149x in 103 Posts
    Rep Power
    51

    Re: Cyclical Universe based on Big Rip Scenario

    That was excellent RP... Thank you so much and I believe you deserve the compliment...

    Quote Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
    Dear dipayankar & Nobody:

    Don't know that a higher compliment has ever been directed at my work, which amounts to an unprecedented assemblage and recognition of the works of others, especially Einstein... Albeit, this (below) is excerpted from chapter one, in response to dipayankar's question about gravity (on or near major gravitational coordinate systems).
    __________________________________________________ ______

    The formula is exactly as simple as it is inescapable. Einstein's GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY equates gravity with acceleration. Einstein's 4th Dimension demands overall right-angle motion of the Three recognized Dimensions Of Space: in one of two possible 4-Dimensional directions (Overall expansion or overall contraction).
    Since objects do not fall 'upward' and away from 3-D Matter, this rules out overall 4-Dimensional contraction.
    Objects do fall 'downward' toward the center of 3-D Matter; therefore confirming by demonstration, in situ (as is): a physically (materially) expanding Universe. The unrecognized causal identity (the source) of the observed, measured, acknowledged, recognized spatially expanding universe.


    Image-3.gif Picture by Txpoet 714 x 303 (90 kb) ShowHide Exif Data


    The conclusion is without precedent - although it has many historically noted revolutionary counterparts and parallels, in the history of Western Science. Recognizing the four dimensional space time continuum as being gravity, and conversely, is and has been patently unavoidable since its remarkably progressive advent; for the reasons provided herein (Refer to Drawing 1 Illustrations 3 & 4)

    The material as well as spatial Universe is 4-Dimensionally expanding; it is this 4-Dimensional accelerating expansion that generates the force experienced and recognized as gravity. Hence objects do not fall to earth; the earth - instead - accelerates upwardly and overtakes them (just as the floor does in Einstein's elevator). Gravity is the 4-D space-time Dimension.




    'Center point mass'.

    4-D accelerating expansion to macrocosmic infinity.

    The same quantity of energy, distributed over an ever increasing space, squared.
    (Without infringement on the law of conservation of mass-energy.)

    This perspective anticipates a return of the abandoned Steady State universe.
    Discarding any need for the 'spontanous creation of Hydrogen' to compensate for what would otherwise be the decreased density of the overall universe.

    Whereas, 'cosmic background radiation' is the signature of any expanding universe scenario, where earlier eras of the expanding universe were inevitably more dense.

    In the proposed interpretation of matter as a continuously expanding field, there is no 'big bang', 'big crunch', or 'big rip'. The materially and spatially expanding universe maintains the same relative density, from the infinite past to the infinite future, ergo: 'Steady State'.

    Kind regards,

    - RP

  3. #103
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,090
    Blog Entries
    130
    Thanks Given
    1,678
    Thanked 861x in 483 Posts
    Rep Power
    43

    Awards Showcase

    NoBangCrunch or Rip: return of Steady State

    Hi Dipayankar:
    The anticipated departure from the big bang appears to be continuing its foreseeable debut - making room on the slate for the orphaned steady state.

    Best regards,
    - RP
    (George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

    "All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
    "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
    "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid

  4. #104
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    292
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: NoBangCrunch or Rip: return of Steady State

    Quote Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
    Hi Dipayankar:
    The anticipated departure from the big bang appears to be continuing its foreseeable debut - making room on the slate for the orphaned steady state.

    Best regards,
    - RP
    Puff

    I'm confused.. you are referring to the steady state of what? Your quotations seem to portray that you do not accept any such theory.

    I'm wondering if you have more info on when Einstein said that. I'm a fan of his and collect his sayings, pix etc.

    Rufe

  5. #105
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,131
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanked 149x in 103 Posts
    Rep Power
    51

    Re: NoBangCrunch or Rip: return of Steady State

    I still feel Big Bang did happen at some time in the history of the Universe. Whether it created the Universe or no is debatable..


    Quote Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
    Hi Dipayankar:
    The anticipated departure from the big bang appears to be continuing its foreseeable debut - making room on the slate for the orphaned steady state.

    Best regards,
    - RP

  6. #106
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,090
    Blog Entries
    130
    Thanks Given
    1,678
    Thanked 861x in 483 Posts
    Rep Power
    43

    Awards Showcase

    Re: NoBangCrunch or Rip: return of Steady State

    Quote Originally Posted by Rufus View Post
    Puff

    I'm confused.. you are referring to the steady state of what? Your quotations seem to portray that you do not accept any such theory.

    I'm wondering if you have more info on when Einstein said that. I'm a fan of his and collect his sayings, pix etc.

    Rufe
    Hi Rufe:
    Referring to the abandoned Steady State theory (of which I am an advocate), by Bondi, Gold and Hoyle. I think it will be reinstated.

    As an Einstein fan, you may find this url, parts I through VII, interesting http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

    Best regards,
    - RP
    (George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

    "All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
    "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
    "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid

  7. #107
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,131
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanked 149x in 103 Posts
    Rep Power
    51

    Re: NoBangCrunch or Rip: return of Steady State

    The steady state theory does have a conflict with The theory of conservation of Mass and Energy


    Quote Originally Posted by RascalPuff View Post
    Hi Rufe:
    Referring to the abandoned Steady State theory (of which I am an advocate), by Bondi, Gold and Hoyle. I think it will be reinstated.

    As an Einstein fan, you may find this url, parts I through VII, interesting http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

    Best regards,
    - RP

 

 
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top