You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Going with religion... God is a trinity of Father, Son and Holy Ghost and in the Bible it says that God made man/everything in his own image... suggesting that as he is really 3, he made everything else like it. What do you think of that?
Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them - Albert Einstein We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them - Albert Einstein
Your theorty is interesting. In your theory you state that the Universe has finite amount of matter and energy. How I have aquestion. If the matter is finite and if according to the Theory of conservation of matter and energy matter and energy cannot be created, where did the matter / energy for the big bang come from which ulimately created such a huge Universe???
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottAnfield
Hi mkirkpatrick, my theory predicts the 'sequence closer', as everything is in threes. It's interesting to hear what you had to say about the room full of people because I've noticed it before in my lectures when someone coughs and it's always 2 the same and one different. My dad told me about the limeys , something about scurvy with sailors in the olden days.
Profpat, my theory is basically that everything in the universe is to do with 3, things come in threes. There a few different bits of the theory on threes.com. It says that everything is connected by tri-interconnectivity, do you understand that bit? It also says that the universe is connected by a black and a white hole (or many of both) and that matter entering the black hole emerges as anti-matter from a white hole. This suggests that there is a finite amount of matter/energy in the universe, it is just changing from one form to another. It also explains a time-loop theory where past and future 'meet'. A controversial part of the theory is that I propose that gravity as we call it doesn't exist. It is all magnetism that controls the pull and push of planets/stars and other things. It also says that the 4 fundamental forces are really just 1- magnetism. Think of the power of magnetism and how strong it is even when small magnets are used.
purveryor of knowledge, thanks for the positive post Thanks for your input because I'm not really clued up in physics, despite my theory, and I don't really know that much about researchers, Planck, thermodynamics etc but it's good to learn. I know that people think that QM and GR should be combined in the TOE but I didn't really understand either so thanks for pointing that out for me- I think I suggest it by saying that both the small and large things are controlled by one force. The way that you describe time flipping and the planck second to the speed of light, can you see that it is similar, if not exactly, like a magnet either being attracted and when they flip to repel one another, they fly away from each other.
Your ying/yang symbolism is spot on. With the tadpoles with the opposing dots. When I talk about two holes connecting, I'm not sure if its just two or many because there are black holes in the centre of galaxies and this could be the way that the matter is turned into anti-matter and 'sent out' into white holes elsewhere. Its a philoshopical idea really and I just use the 2 holes to make it easier as I didnt know how to write it.
As for predicting the future, I think your also right and I believe that things such as deja vu which is currently unexplainable, is caused by a ripple of time passing over you from the matter being sent back in time. What do you think of that? There have been many future predictions that have come true but not exactly. There was a prophetess years ago in the medieval times who said that one day the world would be covered in a web, its only recently with the internet that we understand this web.
I understand your concerns dipayankar, if you read my theory again, there is a long paragraph which answers this question. The theory of conservation of matter and energy is not wrong. My theory also says that matter and energy cannot be created, it says that it simply converts from matter to energy and vice versa (E=mc2), i.e the finite amount of matter and energy in the Universe has always existed because of the time loop (black and white holes etc). Does this answer your question?
Pat...
Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them - Albert Einstein We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them - Albert Einstein
Your answer has made it a lot more interesting. Rolling back time a long long way, at some point of time, matter / energy would have had to be created, even if it came through white holes, it had to be created in another Universe. Does the law of conservation of matter and energy apply to other Universes as well????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottAnfield
I understand your concerns dipayankar, if you read my theory again, there is a long paragraph which answers this question. The theory of conservation of matter and energy is not wrong. My theory also says that matter and energy cannot be created, it says that it simply converts from matter to energy and vice versa (E=mc2), i.e the finite amount of matter and energy in the Universe has always existed because of the time loop (black and white holes etc). Does this answer your question?
My theory describes the timeloop theory as infinity, where white holes and black holes (both in our universe, no other universe) convert matter into energy and vice versa. I believe that this is extremely elegant, the way that time is bent, i.e the point at which past and future meets, and the way that the transformation occurs. The finite amount of matter and energy that we currently know has ALWAYS existed, it is infinite. Why must it have been created in another universe, what proof do we have that another one exists when we don't even really understand our own?
Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them - Albert Einstein We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them - Albert Einstein
This can happen only if we take a cyclic Universe... Again do we really understand how the Universe (that we know of) started??
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottAnfield
My theory describes the timeloop theory as infinity, where white holes and black holes (both in our universe, no other universe) convert matter into energy and vice versa. I believe that this is extremely elegant, the way that time is bent, i.e the point at which past and future meets, and the way that the transformation occurs. The finite amount of matter and energy that we currently know has ALWAYS existed, it is infinite. Why must it have been created in another universe, what proof do we have that another one exists when we don't even really understand our own?
I don't think anybody really knows Dipayankar, it's just a matter of opinion. I think it was created by a Creator, others don't. Some don't believe in a created or big bang universe. There opinions are just as valid.
What do you think Dipayankar?
Scott,
Did anybody help you with your formula? In your formula what happened to C? When you mentioned the golden mean, I assume you referring to phi. Is the third, the line itself, which seperates the inner from the outer? I still a little confused as to the image.
Hi Pat, nobody helped me with me with my formula and that's why I'm unsure of it and and asking people for help who are in the field. As for C, I assume your refering to the speed of light, and I haven't really given much thought to it, other than the thought that it is 299,792,458 metres/second and with the 3 part of the theory, it might have something to do with 300,000,000 being a speed which nothing can exceed or some kind of ultimate speed limit. I used E=mc2 to illustrate the changing from matter to energy and vice versa in the other post.
I have just looked up phi and, yes, it is referring to the golden mean which I mention, but it is the third unseen part that is not immediately obvious. It's the centre of most, if not all, things. It is seen in psychology as a golden mean between extremes and in other things as well. In one form, yes, it does separate the inner from the outer and from a different point of view (the 2 the same, 1 different) it is all of the others in different circumstances, the tri-interconnectivity.
Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them - Albert Einstein We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them - Albert Einstein
I believe time is a causal time loop and I believe I know exactly why the big bang happened. The big bang happened because it IS possible to send an object faster than the speed of light.
What Scott is saying is true that the universe is cyclical, but the key here is that the universe could not be cyclical if it were not possible to send something faster than the speed of light. So imagine that time is a causal time loop and that if the universe can expand at the smallest scales to beyond the speed of light, then it is possible for the big bang to have happened. Hope that helps.
Scott,
THe biggest disagreement I have with your theory is the part where you say that matter cannot be created or destroyed. THat is the 1st law of thermodynamics and I believe it is wrong. This is my criticism of your theory. I believe that time can be converted directly into energy and that this will be the energy source of the future. You can create as much energy as you want this way.
Also try making an electromagnetic coil but make sure you wind it both ways. WInd it once counter-clockwise and wind it once clockwise. Send a current through it and you will see that the two windings cancel out eachother's magnetic field. The result is that this coil creates no magnetic energy. Also, the coil does not become hot, so this coil creates no thermal energy. In other words, this is a type of coil you can create that will destroy energy. You send electricity in and nothing comes out of it. Sometimes it's called a smith coil or a scalar coil. This is one thing they won't teach you in school but from what I can tell this type of a coil destroys energy. Try it yourself because as I sometimes say "demonstration is the judge of all things."
I believe that 1/0 is the absolute greatest value in mathematics and that this value represents the total amount of energy from the source. I believe as much energy can be created or destroyed as you possibly want, but not more energy can be created or destroyed than 1/0 because 1/0 is the absolute greatest value.
, something about scurvy with sailors in the olden days.
Thanks for your input because I'm not really clued up in physics, despite my theory, and I don't really know that much about researchers, Planck, thermodynamics etc but it's good to learn. I know that people think that QM and GR should be combined in the TOE but I didn't really understand either so thanks for pointing that out for me- I think I suggest it by saying that both the small and large things are controlled by one force. The way that you describe time flipping and the planck second to the speed of light, can you see that it is similar, if not exactly, like a magnet either being attracted and when they flip to repel one another, they fly away from each other.
Linear Mode
