[CyborGuy]

"As a seeker (and amateur scholar), what I hope to accomplish by my art is to enter my personal Theory of Everythinginto this great "sea of theories" and try to reconcile my view with the esoteric ideas of other seekers.


The various perspectives on the world are sometimes very diverse. Ranging from the astronomical perspective ofour macro universe down into the scientific minutia and detail of the quantum driven sub-atomic world. Not only that... a viable theory must not only include the vast scientific findings ofthe material view but also include and integrate into its unity, the multiple perspectives and parochial phenomena ofthe various theological and spiritual worldviews as well."

D+ Geometry (Part 1)

In the world of circles... and cycles and spins
there are no beginnings... and there are no ends
So what goes up... will soon come down
As what goes by comes back around

Back and forth... and up and down
from whence we've sprung
to where we're bound
'tis SPIN that makes the world go round.

D+ Geometry is derived from a lifetime of comparative study of various diverse worldviews. Marveling in my youth at the awesome-ness of the universe and the intricate orderliness in nature, I breathed this seemingly simple petition to the gods… What’s It All About???

Slowly, during my lifetime of seeking then, the answer was reflected back to my understanding through the language syntax and artistic expressions of the various poetic BABEL dreams. The answer, it seems, turned out to be not so much What It’s All About??? but rather, how it all works. Close enough. So, that’s what Crossing-of-the-Day Geometry (Dee-Cross, D+ Geometry) is all about… A geometric worldview and how the model works for all. (TOE)

I have come to believe that the woof and warp of the universal creation is divinely organized and ordered by an intricately simple but "dynamic" intelligent design. Those patterns revealed in our lives and times… and broadly manifested in nature then, might well define the Geometry of God.

Spooky Action at a Distance (also called quantum entanglement) is "science" jargon coined to describe the mysterious connected-ness of the diverging spin products generated in the quantum vortex separation of a light molecule (photon). Intelligent Design is "religion" jargon coined to describe the intricate awesome-ness of the manifested world. D+ Geometry is "art" jargon coined to describe the great dynamic fluxing of nature that satisfies both the Spooky Action at a Distance conundrum and the universal search for the Intelligent Design of God, as well.

The origins of the universe (and all)… and the divine source of the creation are not subjects of this thesis. Those ideas will be left for the scholarly debate of the religion verses science pundits. I will, however, use various concepts from both "sides" of the debate… like the Big-Bang Theory, and the Genesis 1 Biblical account of creation, but only in terms of the pattern design.

The great institution of science is pretty much dedicated to investigating both the intricate simplicities and the multiple complexities exhibited in the grand design of the universal nature. They pretty much find it to be orderly. The religion people, pondering on the orderliness, say that it is obvious then, that such an orderly world demands an intelligent designer.

The very term "intelligent designer" connotes some sort of cognitive intention and capricious manipulation. The intelligent design advocates then use this connotation to extrapolate "the (required manipulator) designer" to be their own unique and anthropomorphic (Bible-based) God.

Since origins and divine source are outside the purview of this study, the terminology will necessarly change from intelligent design to dynamic pattern. This eliminates the need for cognitive intervention and could turn the cosmic design function over to a universal geometric algorithm.


OK… Here’s where I come in. I believe that D+ Geometry © 1984, is the geometric algorithm defining the dynamic pattern that organizes the universal omnipresence for rational understanding (and habitation) by the consciousness of man. The glory of this TOE model is that it takes the three exclusive worldviews of science, religion, and art… and reconciles them on the common "pattern matrix" of the D+ Geometrylaw. The fundamental elements of D+ thought are all expressed on this pattern schematic… ).

(Sorry!! The pattern schmatic is graphic and would require an "attachment". It is not permitted in this posting. However, if requested it may be obtained via email.)

(more to come)

[mkirkpatrick]

Welcome to the forum CyborGuy,send you greetings from the U.K.,you theory looks really interesting,I await the next instalment,you mentioned that you could send some
information about the theory via email,I would be most interested in reading this if at all
possible.



warm regards michael.

[CyborGuy]

D+ Geometry (Part 2)

Since D+ Geometry is "metaphysical" it has rights of thought to consider substance and power that are not obvious to purely physical perception. The spiritual substance of creation (in direct opposition to material substance) is not directly seen by material based consciousness, and is generally denied.

Sapient man, by our very nature, is conscious in a material world, spinning in (and through) a dynamic flux. A world with the material substance… forever falling in a gravity field, directed toward a center of greater mass. By the limited scope of our material perception, we are unable to directly observe the spiritual substance… forever rising in the levity field, directed toward the rarefied (spiritual) "God-pole".

Just as a matter of detail… the equal and opposite powers then (gravity and levity), spin the equal and opposite natures (material and spiritual) into the panorama of the great Creation… projected onto the great universal D+ Geometry Grid.

mc2 ¬Sinθ d+® hν

CyGuy¬ King’sX®Skyψ©

Levity

The power of the levity dynamic in nature is not acknowledged as reasonable by the mainline science culture. Institutional science protocol does not recognize the reality of spiritual substance.

The D+ Geometry worldview: It is my conclusion (after many years of dedicated ponder over… "What’s it all about?"), that universal reality is composed of two distinct, conjoined, and essentially opposed, natures…the material and the spiritual. Each substance has its own inherent drawing power… gravity ↔ levity… and never the twain shall meet… Except in the D+ covenant space generated within the resulting SPIN

Because of the obligated spin dynamic of an integrated polar universe such as ours (spiritual and material), the resulting creation flow tends to the round. In a spinning, bifurcating, di-polar world, the covenant space is formed at the universal "balance point". This covenant space is the habitation venue of the spiritual/material hybrid-nature consciousness in man. The (double sided) covenant space, equally dedicated to the opposing poles, periodically alternates then, between its obligated poles… (periodically reversing its power dynamic).

The fundamental D+ schematic contains one additional element on the cosmic dynamic graph… That is…Will. Will… is the sovereign power of individual consciousness, as we know it. It is will that directs the attention of individual consciousness within its own unique and vibrating life-space niche.
We, as human beings, live in a dynamic bifurcating world as hybrid creatures. Our consciousness lives somewhere in a covenant space of the great spin of the universal spiritual/material embrace. Human creatures by our very nature have three levels (body, mind & soul) of vibration (spin) in our individual consciousness niche, with which Will must contend.

Science, religion, and ART all use the D+ Geometry flux to understand and explain their unique worldview perspectives. Science uses a quantum-vortex model. Religion (Christian) uses literal Bible text as its model. ART gleans the intelligent design pattern from the omnipresent here-now in the general revelation of nature.

It takes the D+ Geometry concepts of levity and spin to complete all three models. Both concepts are evident in all three models… but not acknowledged in either science nor religion. D+ Geometry identifies and points out these unseen concepts in all three of the worldview models.

(More)

[CyborGuy]

D+ Geometry (Part 3)

Fudge Factors
of
Denial

Denial of spiritual substance and the levity dynamic has always been a stumbling block to scientific understanding of natural phenomena. It has always been necessary to introduce a "fudge factor" into the models to make them match (at least almost) the flux of nature as observed in the laboratory realities. The science institution uses such paradoxical terms as repulsive gravity, antigravity, dark matter, and dark energyin order to balance the mathematics.

The following quotation was "excerpted" from early pages of "A Brief History Of Time" written by Stephen Hawking, physics professor at Cambridge University. (underlines added)

(Excerpt Quotation )
"Even those who realized that Newton's theory of gravity showed that the universe could not be static did not think to suggest that it might be expanding. Instead, they attempted to modify the theory by making the gravitational force repulsive at very large distances.

Even Einstein, when he formulated the general theory of relativity in 1915, was so sure that the universe had to be static that he modified his theory to make this possible, introducing a so-called cosmological constant into his equations.

Einstein introduced a new "antigravity" force, which, unlike other forces, did not come from any particular source, but was built into the very fabric of space-time. He claimed that space-time had an inbuilt tendency to expand, and this could be made to balance exactly the attraction of all the matter in the universe, so that a static universe would result.

We can determine the present rate of expansion by measuring the velocities at which other galaxies are moving away from us, using the Doppler effect. This can be done very accurately. However, the distances to the galaxies are not very well known because we can only measure them indirectly. So all we know is that the universe is expanding by between 5 percent and 10 percent every thousand million years. However, our uncertainty about the present average density of the universe is even greater. If we add up the masses of all the stars that we can see in our galaxy and other galaxies, the total is less than one hundredth of the amount required to halt the expansion of the universe, even for the lowest estimate of the rate of expansion. Our galaxy and other galaxies, however, must contain a large amount of "dark matter" that we cannot see directly, but which we know must be there because of the influence of its gravitational attraction on the orbits of stars we can see in our galaxies. Moreover, most galaxies are found in clusters, and we can similarly infer the presence of yet more dark matter in between the galaxies in these clusters by its effect on the motion of the galaxies. When we add up all the dark matter; we still get only about one tenth of the amount to halt the expansion. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that there might be some other form of matter, distributed almost uniformly throughout the universe, that we have not detected and that might still raise the average density of the universe up to the critical value needed to halt the expansion." (End of Quote)

Newton and Einstein (bless their genius souls) not withstanding, the same missing link is still missing in the current (and apparently competing) cosmic models of the universal nature and from the bizarre extrapolations of the scholarly science seekers as well.

SCIENCE

Common (at least published) beliefs of the elite college of quantum physics scientists describe their data with a multitude of jargon words. It’s like poetic license for scholars. They invent terms like quark, WIMPs, and MACHOs. These are totally new words with unique scientific meaning. BABEL geometry does not deal with parochial jargon words that are "uniquely scientific terms" such as these.

However, there are other "jargon words" that are not unique to the scientific institution. Dark matter, dark energy, and negative gravity are three such terms. BABEL geometry exercises seek to examine such arbitrary and esoteric (possibly even misleading to common folk) use of common language words like these in fantasy contexts like the Big Bang creation and an expanding universe worldview.

The Babelingo language of D+ Geometry art jargon does not support the use of misleading words (phrases) like those described above as an expression of legitimate scientific truth… but rather as erudite speculation. I respect the laboratory work, the collected data, the theoretical pondering, and the phenomenal mathematics of the science practitioners… but I disagree with the conclusions described as dark matter, dark energy, and negative gravity.
We can "see" matter… by its vary nature. It is manipulated in nature by an energy force we term gravity. Gravity energy causes material objects (matter) to be drawn toward a more massive center (matter pole). All well and good. So…

Let’s do a flash-back to Bible times. The Genesis model for the creation of the world is expressed like this. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." The earth is composed of material substance and gravitational energy. The heaven, on the other hand, is composed of spiritual substance (in opposition to material) and levitational energy (opposite of gravitational energy).

There’s a lot more to discuss here but first let us just consider the next "move" in the Biblical creation sequence. Right after the "beginning"… the "spirit of God" moved… levitating the spiritual substance of the creation… as the gravitational energy of the material nature moved in opposition… the world began to SPIN (the Spiritual Power In Nature) and does to this day. If you don’t believe it just watch the sun go by… or carefully watch your private daily flush.

I believe dark matter is better defined as spiritual substance… and dark energy is better described as spiritual energy… and negative gravity should be re-designated as positive levity. If these changes were made in the "elite science lexicon" and applied in the copious prognostication mathematics… I think the numbers would work out better and the people of common language could better understand the nature of nature and ponder the more proper words and perhaps better understand the true "Geometry of God"