Expansion of 4-D Matter Part III

[RascalPuff]

So, what happened to world expansion. Let's go back to the main topic.

Let's outline the facts based on most popular theories,

The burst of energy at the time of Big Bang created the initial rapid inflation of space.

The residual expansion had continued for another 7 billion years.

Mattr creation increased the gravity which have slowed down the expansion.

It is proposed that the space expansion of the next seven billion years is due to dark energy.

The nature of dark energy is not known.

The expansion of the universe is accelerating is accelerating.

If the matter density in the universe is constant (critical density), Then matter creation has to continue along the space expansion.

The above are few points which should be able to to bring the discusssion in the track.

Cheers

Hey Mohsen:
Steady State advocate here.

With the proposed accelerating expansion of corporeal matter, the density of the spatial universe remains steady, because matter itself is proportionately enlarging with the enlargement of space, ad infinitum..

In accordance with my interpretations, 'dark energy' is another - (new, 1998 vintaged) - word for what used to be called (Einstein's) 'cosmological constant' - a repelling force generated by all matter, 'just like gravity' but causing things to move outwardly instead of inwardly. Unlike gravity, the cosmological constant (dark energy) force increases - instead of decreasing - with distance. This is why the universe is not merely expanding, but rather undergoing an accelerating expansion. The more distant the light source, the faster it is receding.

Good to hear from you; best regards,
- RP

[Mohsen]

"With the proposed accelerating expansion of corporeal matter, the density of the spatial universe remains steady, because matter itself is proportionately enlarging with the enlargement of space, ad infinitum"

Are you referring to "The Final Theory" Idea. The concept has many problems.

According to the best that we know, The unverse is expanding. Although clusters of galaxies are getting close to each other because of gravity effect. It seems that the expansion is detectable in intergalactic space.

Mohsen

[RascalPuff]

"With the proposed accelerating expansion of corporeal matter, the density of the spatial universe remains steady, because matter itself is proportionately enlarging with the enlargement of space, ad infinitum"

Are you referring to "The Final Theory" Idea. The concept has many problems.

According to the best that we know, The unverse is expanding. Although clusters of galaxies are getting close to each other because of gravity effect. It seems that the expansion is detectable in intergalactic space.

Mohsen

___________________________________

The first two chapters of McCutcheon's (2002 dated) so called 'Final Theory' were apparently purloined from my 49 year old works (Ten sold out, internationally distributed small press editions, the 9th of which appeared on the internet in December '99). After the first two chapters, 'The Final Theory', as you are apparently aware, undoes itself.

Best regards to you and yours, Dr. Mohsen.
- RP

[Mohsen]

[

"This in my view is one of the blunders Einstein also made and it has led to the erroneous theory of time dilation: "

Time dilation has been shown experimentally. Many astrophysical experiments and Nasa missions are performed on the basis of the special relativity principles with precision performace.

Although, alternative thinking is needed to solve the present paradoxes, denying sound scientific cocepts is not going to be very helpful.

Cheers,

Mohsen

[RascalPuff]

[

"This in my view is one of the blunders Einstein also made and it has led to the erroneous theory of time dilation: "

Time dilation has been shown experimentally. Many astrophysical experiments and Nasa missions are performed on the basis of the special relativity principles with precision performace.

Although, alternative thinking is needed to solve the present paradoxes, denying sound scientific cocepts is not going to be very helpful.

Cheers,

Mohsen

Presumably the quote is from a source other than myself; because I couldn't agree with you more. My work specifically advocates and contributes to the causes of time dilation. If you are speaking of the so called 'Final Theory', that author has burdened himself with a bundle of blunders. Elevated the universe out of sight and put a new one under it.

Best regards,
- RP

[ThirdWorld]

Time dilation has been shown experimentally.

*** If the rate of radioactive decay of a substance used in a timing device is seen to be affected by an accelerating [ ie angular acceleration or otherwise] aircraft that cannot be construed to be that time is dependent on speed.

In my view it is foolish, even bordering on superstition, to equate the dimension of time [T] with speed [dimensions L/T].

[quote] Many astrophysical experiments and Nasa missions are performed on the basis of the special relativity principles with precision performance. [ /quote]

*** Describe one of those experiments or missions and let's investigate it.

Although, alternative thinking is needed to solve the present paradoxes, denying sound scientific concepts is not going to be very helpful.

*** Quoting NASA and Einstein as authorities will not suffice at this point, we must objectively discuss their ideas and see whether their theories can stand up to scrutiny.


Roger

[neutralino]

Time dilation has been shown experimentally. Many astrophysical experiments and Nasa missions are performed on the basis of the special relativity principles with precision performace.

Relativity is used in an even more everyday sense: global positioning systems and other satellites have to allow for relativistic corrections.

[Mohsen]

Thanks, Neutrlino

Mohsen

Relativity is used in an even more everyday sense: global positioning systems and other satellites have to allow for relativistic corrections.

[RascalPuff]

It may indeed be, Michael, and here is a form of inflation (from 'Third World'):

***The whole concoction about 4-D space-time Dimension and 4-Dimensional expansion are just slights of the hands of a trickster/ magician to distract the audience from the inevitable errors in this theory.

All it is trying to say is that the universe is expanding in volume and it is doing so in a manner that results in all its constituent parts [planets etc] accelerating outwards as opposed to moving with constant velocity.

It is further alleging that this acceleration is responsible for gravity in the same way the accelerating elevator causes "weight".

This is not the most disingenuous theory I have heard but it is nonetheless incorrect.

If you try to stand below the floor of the elevator that is accelerating upwards you will experience no force: you must stand on [ie at the top of] the floor to experience this force.

Affirmative, Third World, one must indeed be inside Einstein's exemplary elevator (coordinate system), in order to experience the effects Einstein is holding in point.

In like manner, if gravity was being caused in the way Einstein explained then those on one side of the earth [ ie on top] will experience g forces whereas those obliquely opposite [ie those down under] will fall off.

Further this theory cannot explain why the person in the upward accelerating elevator experiences weight/ g-like forces in the fist place. It cannot explain inertia or reluctance to move: why are objects reluctant to move?

Roger
(Third World)
_______________________

(Good to hear from you, Michael. - RP)

_______________________

Dear Third World:

Does this help explain more?





As regards negative inertia. the exemplary (below illustrated) - omnidirectionally accelerating - apple (any system of corporeal matter at rest), opposes a resistance (reluctance to respond) to any outside forces acting upon it (Special effects by Austin P. Torney - illustration, copyright, by K.B. Robertson - Truly Yours).



Best regards,
- RP

[Coldcreation]

...if gravity was being caused in the way Einstein explained then those on one side of the earth [ ie on top] will experience g forces whereas those obliquely opposite [ie those down under] will fall off.

Hello RascalPuff,

How do you arrive at that remarkable conclusion?

Further this theory cannot explain why the person in the upward accelerating elevator experiences weight/ g-like forces in the fist place. It cannot explain inertia or reluctance to move: why are objects reluctant to move?

I was actually reluctant to move when I read your post. What gave me the 'force' or 'inertial impetus' to do so was an apparent contradiction in your writings. You ask why objects are reluctant to move, and yet you also write:

Einstein's tensor equations find the 4th dimension to be prevalent in all matter. All matter is in motion. Motion is interchangeably synonymous with time (the interval - distance - between two or more events). The definitional context of dimensions at issue here is that of right angle motion - perpendicularity - relative to preceding coordinates, as described and illustrated in the subected text. Until further notice, there are no particles that are not in motion. You may slice through time with calculus or other non metric mathematical means, but you cannot flash freeze a moving particle in real - metric - time. In lieu of 0o K being observed or achieved in the laboratory, everything has something to do with motion (Timotion).

My question to you is: How can something be reluctant to move when it is already in motion. In another way: If everything is in motion, shouldn't you be asking why objects are reluctant to stop?

Is it not the same thing that causes something to move, or to stop moving (relative to some fixed reference frame and that of the object in question)? If it is not a force, energy, or a curved spacetime phenomenon, what do you think it is?


Coldcreation