[everymansmedium]

David
I am not trying to compete with you. I spent most of my childhood alone. I never did learn to compete like most. We all have feathers in our cap, however I don't feel that I need to prove anything to any body except that I simply wish to be able to communicate an idea without hostilities. I would rather be your friend for I feel you could be helpful in what I am doing, and I also feel I can be helpful in your efforts. We are all after the same goal here. We all wish to expand the knowledge of mankind. We all have quite different motivation to do that, but the goal is the same whatever the motivation. I value the scientific method the same as you do. I however also value an open mind.
I do find it tiring when I am told that information that has never been satisfactorily removed as a variable is not only ignored but I am told I can not use a variable that I still see as quite viable.

The scientific community has been attempting to put together a UFT for years using only systems where a measurement can verify. They are no closer today then they were 50 years ago. With the exception of string theory, super string theory and M theory, that can not be verified by measurement. These methods could have been used to predict results from measurements if it had not already been done by other methods. How many places are there that these theories could have been used to predict the outcome of measurements if other ways had not been used first. Do you think that the knowledge of reality drives the outcome of there calculations? I think if that was the case that we never would have heard of string theory.


How will you feel when by using predicate calculus we learn to simulate a being using awareness of self and continue as a motivation. Then we could experiment with probabilities to set priorities. Is this like being able to take measurements of the act of being? I have spent many years working on this very thought. This I will call the education that allows me to make the following educated GUESS.

Beware the following is my own speculation or call it an educated guess.
The above will happen long before man creates life from the beginning. Man will never create life, because all life is one single organism, with only 1 single I AM that we all share. We all eat of the body and drink of the blood of the one single organism LIFE. It will not be long before we are all aware of this thought. Life is the image of the divine that we are created within. I believe that this is information that has been trying to surface throughout mans history. I do not follow any organized religion. I find this as a viable solution to a multitude of unanswered questions. I do think that there may be previous attempts at having information surface in many places all over the globe all through out history. The truth is spread all over the world among all of its peoples. This thought will enable the separation of the writings of man from the surfacing of the knowledge of the divine force.

John.

[dleviwing]

Originally Posted by everymansmedium I would rather be your friend for I feel you could be helpful in what I am doing, and I also feel I can be helpful in your efforts. We are all after the same goal here. We all wish to expand the knowledge of mankind. We all have quite different motivation to do that, but the goal is the same whatever the motivation. I value the scientific method the same as you do. I however also value an open mind.

Helpful in what way? Understand that I do have an open mind that I will not allow trash that I have discarded to be thrown back in it nor allow others to put their trash in it. My mind is only open to high probability truths.

Originally Posted by everymansmedium The scientific community has been attempting to put together a UFT for years using only systems where a measurement can verify. They are no closer today then they were 50 years ago.

You are misinformed! Your knowledge of the current state of the UFT is not up to date.

Originally Posted by everymansmedium How will you feel when by using predicate calculus we learn to simulate a being using awareness of self and continue as a motivation. Then we could experiment with probabilities to set priorities. Is this like being able to take measurements of the act of being? I have spent many years working on this very thought. This I will call the education that allows me to make the following educated GUESS.

If this were to happen then we would no longer have the religious crutch for the ignorant; it would all be science. I would not put any money on it though.

Originally Posted by everymansmedium Beware the following is my own speculation or call it an educated guess. The above will happen long before man creates life from the beginning. Man will never create life, because all life is one single organism, with only 1 single I AM that we all share. We all eat of the body and drink of the blood of the one single organism LIFE. It will not be long before we are all aware of this thought. Life is the image of the divine that we are created within. I believe that this is information that has been trying to surface throughout mans history. I do not follow any organized religion. I find this as a viable solution to a multitude of unanswered questions. I do think that there may be previous attempts at having information surface in many places all over the globe all through out history. The truth is spread all over the world among all of its peoples. This thought will enable the separation of the writings of man from the surfacing of the knowledge of the divine force.

This kind of thought is the root to many eastern philosophies and religions. It is not new nor is it measurable; it is a belief system without evidence just like any religion and even string theory; thus not science. To be called a scientific theory one must present a means of empirical testing and evidence.

[everymansmedium]

There is no scientific evidence for the statement that life began at random either. That also is a religion with no measurement to back it. The scientific community as a whole are very reluctant to indicate a question mark where it needs to be. It is not good for business.
I will not attempt to communicate any further
John

[dleviwing]

Originally Posted by everymansmedium There is no scientific evidence for the statement that life began at random either. That also is a religion with no measurement to back it. The scientific community as a whole are very reluctant to indicate a question mark where it needs to be. It is not good for business.

Amino acid molecules have been created from inert atoms; so I would disagree with your statement as it is applied. I would however agree that it is true of many other areas of science theory. Sometimes it is best to say "I don't know".

[satdev sharma]

Originally Posted by MJA Is the theory of Evolution a Creation Theory of Intelligent Design? = MJA

Dear MJA
The word Evolution used in my theory is not related to Darwin.Some thing cannot be created out of nothing.There must be First Principal.He does not think the way we think He is the First Cause ofcreation without premeditated design.The creation and Laws were born simultaneously The laws are the architect of design Actually there is no birth or death because i have proved mathematically that all the creation is unified nothing is isolated
As for the Standard Model ,nothing is stndard for ever.Standard Model has left many things unsolved as an example the standard model cannot be used to derive even the simple Coulomb law of force between charges.What are the so called mass and chargeI have made an humble attempt to explain all these
thanking you
satdev sharma sharma_satdev@yahoo.co.in

[Rufus]

satev sharma

Do you really think that everything could be explained by math equasions? rufe

[MJA]

Originally Posted by Rufus satev sharma Do you really think that everything could be explained by math equasions? rufe

If you don't mind another view,

Many things cannot or will not ever be explained by mathematics,
but everything can be united by the simplicity of a mathematical equation.

=
MJA

[Rufus]

Originally Posted by MJA If you don't mind another view, Many things cannot or will not ever be explained by mathematics, but everything can be united by the simplicity of a mathematical equation. = MJA

I didn't mean to offend you
Math (in my opinion) is just another toy ..like html
There is no mathematical equasion for thought itself

You are allowed another view ;~)

[MJA]

Originally Posted by Rufus I didn't mean to offend you Math (in my opinion) is just another toy ..like html There is no mathematical equasion for thought itself You are allowed another view ;~)

The mathematical equation for the thought of nature's true unity is siimply = my Dear Rufus, nothing more.

=
MJA