Evolution of Physical Laws : Theory of Everything

[satdev sharma]

EVOLUTION OF PHYSICAL LAWS: Theory of Everything

From time immemorial the question about the manifestation of world has been puzzling the thinking power of human beings along with the creation of mass and energy, physical laws were also evolved to save the creation from chaos.

In my book I have made a humble attempt to know about the formation of units of mass and energy and the worth of physical laws. The manifested world precipitated out of so called empty space but actually space is not empty. The mass and energy evolved out of Akasha or ether. The primary cause of creation is motion or perturbation. The primary cause led to the formation of Akashon or mass packet and unit of energy Prakashon or Photon. The formation of unit of mass and energy is governed by certain natural rules.

The basic equation named as ‘Mother of all Equations’ dictates the property of Akashon (mass packet) and Prakashon (Photon). The concept of force and field has been discussed entirely from new angle. The new concept of field dispenses with involvement of unrealistic virtual particles and leads to comprehensive derivation s of Newton’s and Coulomb’s laws of forces between mass and charge by using very simple mathematics.

Einstein’s theory of special relativity and general theory of relativity are tackled without using any brain-racking mathematics. The theories are written in such a manner that the treatment is no more enigma but appeals to the common sense. The results of general theory of relativity are derived without using tensor algebra.

The dual nature of moving particle and uncertainty are no longer brain teasing problems. The quantum mechanics is not shrouded in veil of mystery. The noble approach used to discuss energy problems without using Schrödinger equation is bereft of foot long differential equations. Therefore, elementary knowledge of mathematics is required to understand quantum mechanics. Energy equation of photon has been derived in very simple manner after discussing the nature of photon. The problem of hydrogen atom along with three quantum numbers has been solved without using Schrödinger wave equation.

The unification of gravitational force, electromagnetic force along with strong and weak forces has been discussed in very straight forward manner.

The structure of atom is presented in new model which can logically explain the problems of radio-activity and fishing.

Overall conclusion is that so called problems of higher physics can be understood easily and the subject of physics has been given look of physics and not that of higher mathematics by dispensing with complicated higher mathematics. The high pedestal of physics has been brought down to common level by renting the curtain of higher mathematics surrounding it. Therefore, even lay man can now understand the working of Universe.

(sharma_satdev@yahoo.co.in)

[Profpat]

Hello Satdev Sharma;

You probably posted in the correct spot the only problem is that the theory of nothing is a really active site and so anyone who posts their theories under Your Toe Theory will usually be bumped to the hinter lands before anyone notices.

Do you have a PDF file regarding you theory or will I have to buy the book?

I have my own speculative theory, also very easy to understand at:
( http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-t...03-idea-4.html )
You'll have to scroll 8 posts down to post #40.

Best to you,

Pat

[everymansmedium]

Hello Satdev Sharma:
I also would be interested in reading this document you talk of.
You may find my thoughts at my blog here and at:
http://unit-unity-community.com
Thank you John.

[satdev sharma]

Thanks Pat for your comments,

I am happy to know that your goal is also the same as mine. At present I am traveling, I will divulge more information once I am back. Please you also enlighten somewhat more about your attempt.

Best wishes,
Satdev

[satdev sharma]

Hello Satdev Sharma:
I also would be interested in reading this document you talk of.
You may find my thoughts at my blog here and at:
http://unit-unity-community.com
Thank you John.

Dear John first of all thanks for showing interest in my ideas.

I had gone through your blog and let me tell you that your way of putting things is very interesting and philosophical. At present I am traveling, I'll keep in touch with you.

Regards,
Satdev

[everymansmedium]

Hello Again Satdev Sharma:
I also look forward to your return. It seems the universe here at toe-quest is always expanding everyone else right out of the universe. This post will bring you once again into view. I do not see why it is necessary to have so many individual threads from 1 or 2 individuals unless it be to maintain the light upon themselves. I would never have more than one active at any one time. But I guess that is just me.
John.

[MJA]

Is the theory of Evolution a Creation Theory of Intelligent Design?


=
MJA

[dleviwing]

satdev sharma;
Welcome to ToeQuest.

Many members express the same goals of wanting to simplify science to the level of laymen understanding; to do so however, have the requirements of comprehending current standard models, theories, and terminology. Do you have such a background?

Is the theory of Evolution a Creation Theory of Intelligent Design?

NO; ID is just a masked attempt to promote creationism religious concepts as science. Nova has an episode out called “Judgment Day”; I suggest you view it if you can.

[everymansmedium]

Hello MJA:
It is possible that evolution is a tool of the creation that happens at the point of creation, "NOW". I think the actual knowledge of intelligence is yet to be determined. You know that I believe in intelligent design. I am sure what I believe is only of interest to me and is not for debate.

to: Satdev Sharma
As you can see there is diversity here. I try very hard to keep mine friendly. This diversity is a fact of life. The fact that it is before you indicates a more real situation. Some of us here keep all of the possibilities open. Some do not. I spent a lifetime as a metrologist / test engineer. Making measurements that never did seem to lead anywhere that gives real insight. I am now in the process of releasing information about some 20 years of research into human motivation simulation using predicate calculus, AI techniques. This work may result in what might be called a way to make a measurement of the process of being by it's simulation.

Of course it depends on whether you feel that a simulation of a thing indicates a knowledge of the thing being simulated. Thus a measurement of a copy when no measurement of the actual can be made.
I only have one thread open at any one time, so it should not be hard to find.
I do not Hide the fact that I believe that the things I decide to research are chosen by methods that are totally not accepted as real by any but me. That fact however does not degrade the work that I do.
John

[dleviwing]

I spent a lifetime as a metrologist / test engineer. Making measurements that never did seem to lead anywhere that gives real insight.

John;
I only spent 4 years as a metrology engineer; seven of my standard methodology for radiometry are now part of the NBS. You should have exerted yourself a little more! I would have to say you lack the insight.