The holy grail

[gunnar]

hi everyone,

www.finalcopy.comyr.com has been updated for what seems to be the last time. it has seen alot of change in the last few years, and always has stayed true to its founding principles. one of the few original postings on the internet is found here at the beginning of this thread.

again, thank you to the members of this site for the development of understanding how and what needed to be addressed; it is one thing to make sense to yourself, and another to relay it in a format that clearly states the same content to others.

for those who are fimiliar with this work, the new content allows a smooth read with trimming of fat, realignment and changes in content to most accurately describe what has been said along. one example:

(science) "Technically mathematics has enforcable limitations of expression."

enjoy.


thank you all,
gunnar

[austintorn@aol.com]

How about that all is in balance, yes, as the conserved energies cancel out, but there would still have to be a small capability of the near 'nothing' remainder that could form pluses and minuses to spew out.

Can your theory give a little?

[gunnar]

yes, the first paragraph of page 2 connected with the first paragraph of page 4 in www.finalcopy.comyr.com - there are several parts to a whole concept.

[labelwench]

Hello Gunnar,

Are you able to describe in more detail that which you refer to as 'mark of the beast'?

Regards,

Labelwench

[gunnar]

hi labelwench,

not really, it seems that there are dozens of applicable technologies that exist now. to choose which one would be a guess.

there are aslo too many information applications like age, medical conditions, religious preference, race, origin of birth, criminal history, place of residence... to state what the mark of the beast will specifically monitor would also be a guess.

trying to determine how it will be introduced, slowly like for manditory medical health care, or fast because of worthless money is also anyones guess.

when a new technology exists it is applied at the first oppertunity. there is no reason why the mark of the beast would be any different.

thank you,
gunnar

[labelwench]

That all have a need to exist, may well be the only way in which unique beings may be said to be equal.

How to provide equal opportunities for each then?

Perhaps it is the directive for each to seek out the opportunities best suited to them?

'IT IS NORMAL FOR EACH DIFFERENT REPRESENTATION OF POSSIBLE HUMAN BEING TO EXIST.' Originally posted by Gunnar

It seems a plausible evolutionary strategy that each representation would then be hardwired to believe that it's own perspective was the most viable strategy for success and would seek similar kind for reassurance and support, possibly propagation.

The dissimilar is also sought for reasons of comparison, some of which may be assimilated in seeking growth and to maintain balance.

We need to evolve beyond the differences and accept that each is both normal and unique, with an equal right to existence.

An equal right to existence, with the freedom to choose our life experiences, may then be the ideal sought.

[gunnar]

hi labelwench,

a book could be written about this, however it would be my interpretation of how i understand it. so to have the correct foundation in which everyone can do the same, will lead to a similar overall understanding.

How to provide equal opportunities for each then?

since we are all different... freedom and sharing are always good.

gunnar

[gunnar]

hi everyone,

this is the first paragraph of page 2 and 4 found at www.finalcopy.comyr.com

the first paragraph on page 2:

"nothing is something, it is nothing. this concept contains both an act of creation with nothing being something and an act of destruction, as this something is nothing. balance allows sustained existence."

the first paragraph on page 4:

"nothing as neutral, creation as positive and destruction as negative establishes the existence of energy in an atmosphere of environment."

why there are 2 pages between these paragraphs:

the evolution of energy structure developes from one extreme to another in possibility to establish a whole foundation for energy existence.

gunnar

[gunnar]

hi everyone,

string, big bang, steady state, relativity... are all theories that have problems defining a whole existence. most of these problems stem from not having or recognizing the origin of existence. this complicates each theory in content and structure to a point that makes it difficult, if not impossible to correct.

however, each of these theories in part offers detailed facts.

an understanding in principle recognizes every part connected as a whole.

www.finalcopy.comyr.com is a complete structure in principle that provides the detailed facts of existence (and everything else) a rightful place.


gunnar

[gunnar]

hi everyone,

all theories have in concept a foundation that allows exploration.

the big bang theory provides some of the most comprehensive and accurate explinations supported by scientific evidence. however it can not and does not provide any explination for its initial condition.

this seems to be a structural problem. evidence used in the attempt to support the big bang theory as an origin is being applied out of order.

all forms and functions exist from the continued developement of energy over billions of years, not from an explosion at the instant of creation (from energy already conveniently in existence).

gunnar