[Guille]

For those who already have their own TOE or those who are developing one, or planning to develop one, here I give you a page in Mikio Kaku's web which is an article about what your TOE's should have. I'f read many TOE but non of them included all of the things that appear hear.....

http://www.mkaku.org/articles/proposal_uft.shtml

If any of you has a theory that includes all of what that article says, give me the your web, because I'm very board of reading the same TOE's which don't include any math, at least a bit. Or theories that are based in filosofying and non-empirical demonstrations.

[AntonioLao]

my TOE is to quantize the Einstein's metric expressed as . In matrix notation, its elements are given by the following

g11=-1, g12=0, g13=0, g14=0
g21=0, g22=-1, g23=0, g24=0
g31=0, g32=0, g33=-1, g34=0
g41=0, g42=0, g43=0, g44=1

in the quantized form, none of the elements has value of zero. But in the homogeneous and isotropic form of at dimension six, it cannot be transformed into the Einstein's metric again.

[Guille]

Is your theory a theory of everything?


Can you give me a web were your theory is explained?

[AntonioLao]

i don't have a web site. But i did send it to Physical Review D in October 2004 and the Editor returned the manuscript back. His comment is "not suitable for publication." Dr. Erick Weinberg is the Editor at that time.

my paper is about the "Conceptual derivation for a quantum of mass." The follow-up paper would have been "Spacetime quantization for General Mass and Charge."

[zeroca]

I’m not a scientist and never cared what Einstein, or some outstanding physicist says. For some reason it happened that the law of former USSR was against me, but in fact I was innocent, so I ventured not to submit to the verdict of Georgian Socialist Republic, after which I found myself in all-union search. I sought a mechanism to survive against the huge system, so began to think about the origin of the universe and a global mechanism based on it. The idea of nothing appeared in my mind. Then I restored old, ancient system based on nothing (the ancestors of mankind used it for making harmony all over the world), called it “Active zero” and practiced it in the period 1987-97 years for political purposes, also for restoration of environment globally, even in the period, when the USSR lead atomic tests in the middle Asia.
The basical aspects of the system and theory are shown at

http://autorestore.gol.ge/index.html

Believe me the putting forward of the theory was thousand times more difficult, than its thinking over and afterwards its use. I did so for seeking a partner, concrete, certain person or scientific organization: I’d like to use a system against global cataclysms and national disasters, particularly let’s say for restoration of ozone layer. Just this is my purpose. I really don’t care about educational purposes of the mankind, or what they think, because once, one so called huge strong system consisted of about 300 000 000 person couldn’t prove itself to be so.

[AntonioLao]

zeroca,

your superhuman experience is closely similar to ancient practices of Buddhism in attaining a state of nirvana. More about nirvana at http://www.selfknowledge.com/109719.htm
Nirvana is also defined as a state of perfect emptiness or true absolute vacuum.

[Guille]

Zeroca,

I don't know If I would consider your theory a theory of everything.

I think it is more sort of a normal filosofical-based theory.

It is ok, a bit too strange for my mind, but a theory I wouldn't consider a TOE.

Don't you thinks so?

[zeroca]

I understand TOE as the basical theory, conception, idea with which all phenomenon, all processes of universe can be explained and to say honestly didn’t trouble myself about definition of the term-TOE. In my theory nothing and separation plays such main role, and I don’t think that philosophical explanation of subject is main fault.
(I don’t claim as well that mine is the best, or even normal)
Maybe I don’t understand what is meant by the term TOE; then, explain its precise meaning briefly, if you don’t mind.

[AntonioLao]

within the physics community, TOE is an acronym for a Theory of Everything. It so happens that physicists are the only ones that are obssess with finding a theory of everything. In the 17th century, science in general and physics in particular is just an endeavor in knowing the how? what? where? now science, specially physics, wants also to know why? when asking the question: why, this implies a broader and more comprehensive understanding directed all the way to the source or origin of things.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

within the physics community, TOE is an acronym for a Theory of Everything. It so happens that physicists are the only ones that are obssess with finding a theory of everything. In the 17th century, science in general and physics in particular is just an endeavor in knowing the how? what? where? now science, specially physics, wants also to know why? when asking the question: why, this implies a broader and more comprehensive understanding directed all the way to the source or origin of things.

I find this post a perfect explenation.

Antonio,

I find the question how strongly conected to why. So I would say both of them are trying to be answered with a TOE.

Its just an opinion.