[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick

I have no wish to follow anyone my friend

I understand. They are trying to make a point while I'm trying to sell the idea of a unit circle that is also gauge invariance. Because of this gauge invariance the unit circle does appear like a point should be defined, physically or mathematically.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

I understand. They are trying to make a point while I'm trying to sell the idea of a unit circle that is also gauge invariance. Because of this gauge invariance the unit circle does appear like a point should be defined, physically or mathematically.

There is at times great difficulty in defining anything so that there is perfect agreement
from all camps?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick

perfect agreement

I'm wondering could this really apply to me since I'm not a perfectionist? Bohr and Einstein as perfectionists themselves never could agree between field and particle or wave and particle.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

I'm wondering could this really apply to me since I'm not a perfectionist? Bohr and Einstein as perfectionists themselves never could agree between field and particle or wave and particle.

You are a hard and most diligent investigator Antonio,and will not rest until you unlock
the answer to colf fusion,my hat is off to you sir!Prehaps your not quite a perfectionist?



regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY

To give pif due credit, if it has any size at all it is infinite.

Thanks for passing it on Nobody,point taken?




regards michael.