Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Theory of Everything > Your TOE Theory
Reload this Page Abstracting away to the ultimate theory
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Abstracting away to the ultimate theory
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Orange Belt
DoYouKnow is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 26
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 13
   
Abstracting away to the ultimate theory - 04-06-2005, 06:54 PM

Hi,

I am DoYouKnow and I'm new to this forum. Theories of Everything (TOE) has arisen little interest in me, I'm more interested in the physics that underlies portions of the universe. It's like a book that I don't want to end. The journey to the end is exciting, but I think that once we're there, the end result may end up quite boring after some time. So, I think that I'm interested in what scientific revolution it will bring. Though I'm not certain that I want it to be discovered today, or before I die. I'm a high school student right now, and I hope that I can contribute something to the scientific community, so I'm interested in the philosophy of space-time and what makes us see things in discrete ways. I think there's some mystery going on between discreteness and time, from what little I've read, I think that time somehow is part of what ends up making things discrete. Time really deserves all the credit, it seems to do everything. One interesting thought that I've had is that all events would exist indendent of each other in space if time didn't progress from one moment to the next. This could probably be stated in the context of topology, differential equations, and many branches of mathematics. The simple distance equation:
D=rt
States that distance is equal to the rate at which an object is travelling, times the time that it has travelled. If time didn't exist, t would always equal 0, and the distance traversed would be zero. All objects would exist independent of one another. It's time that provides this connection, or "metric", between objects.

A metric space is a topological space satisfying three properties.
g(x,y) = g(y,x)
g(x,y) = iff x=y (this is the interesting case that we are interested in)Triangle Equality d(x,y) + d(y,z) >= d(x,z) - this is called the triangle inequality because it states that the lengths of two sides of a triangle added up is greater than or equal to the length of the remaining side)

keep in mind that this is relative time, time will always appear to an individual within it to be perfectly linear, since it's by its very nature. An individual living within a time with a certain order will have a certain order to their thoughts, and their creation, which to the being will all occur in sucession. So, relative to another universe, our time may be highly nonlinear, and other universes might appear to be purely random. It's this infinite cycle of randomness on which the creation of our universe may have been based. One possible counterexample to this is the possibility that a wormhole would've bridged our universe and another universe, causing our universe to destroy itself or cause noticeable effects, hasn't materialized.

I'll keep you up-to-date if I have any other interesting thoughts or calculations.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
04-07-2005, 04:33 PM

your profound thoughts about the concept of time initiated my reply. For me, the concept of time is possible mainly because spacetime points (i should have said space points) are in motion at the local infinitesimal region. If space points are not moving then there is no time. But once one point starts moving, it establishes a path connecting to another point. This point will keep moving along this path forever. The sum of all infinitesimal paths for this point becomes a closed loop and this is linked to another closed loop from the motion of another point. Out of the infinite number of points, their motions will only formed two distinct topological spaces that are not equivalent. Let's call one topology as H+ and the other as H-. So the totality of space is made of an infinite number of H+'s and H-'s. Each can be used as a distinct chronon of time. So similar to electric charge, time also is made of two polarities, one is called the past and the other is called the future. If space is composed of equal number of H+'s and H-'s then this space has no past and future. All it has is the now and forever and ever. Matter is made of odd multiples of H+'s and H-'s but less of one or the other and this disparity causes it to move a particular direction of time. The antimatter moves in the other opposite direction. But energy is made of even multiples of H+'s and H-'s, but the disparity can still allow energy to move in two time directions but at different rates compared to that of matter.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
04-08-2005, 03:34 PM

the proportionality constant of the motion of matter and of energy was already given by Einstein's E=mc^2. But in addition, I'm giving a new proportionality constant between the motion of continuous space (S) and the total energy of the universe given by

S=cE

In vector notations, this is equal to the inner product of a force and the time rate of change of area given

S=\mathbf{F} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Intro to what Supertrings are james l. digol String Theory 29 07-03-2008 02:07 PM
Super String Theory Mohsen TOE Theory Articles 8 04-03-2008 06:53 AM
WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB Serge Patlavskiy Theory Characteristics 3 09-11-2007 10:18 PM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com