Re: Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here)
Quote:
=Drifter;
released from the relative confinement, entombment of relative consciousness and body, into what might be termed as an Abstract Etheric Awareness.?
Things are not what they seem, nor are they otherwise
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid! Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh, and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt.
Re: Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drifter
No need for those thing there G.
In T.M. all that baggage is left behind.
It is a very Light journey you understand, don't you?
Of the word were "moving on too"?
How about "a Vehicle", yes, 'Vehicle', might do nicely for our purposes.
Would you agree?
Brings to mind another consideration, "fuel" to propel, our "Vehicle".
A Mantra perhaps, hummmm. By Job, I've got one!
Matter is the "Vehicle", on this plane of existence,
For the manifestation of the soul!
And, The Soul, on A Higher Plane of manifestation,
Is The Vehicle for The Spirit!!!
Wait just one second!!!!
I'm having another Epiphany!!!
These Three are A TRINITY!!!
And there SYNTHESIZED BY LIFE . . .
WHICH PERVADES THEM ALL . . . GLORY OF GLORIES . . .
I think we may have something here.
yes Matter! transient form without mass moving through the ethereal plane sometimes called the Astra place ... no desire just peace in the all ... floating amazing what shows up just amazing yes indeed just amazing ...
Who? have to say hi an let them know I'm there ... why not?
carefully about epiphanies, they are hard to clean up off the carpet.
fuel? given at the beginning never used up me thinks ..
Second? query what is that? time? Enter query to consciousness ... does not compute ... does not compute .... referencing time .... .... ..... ... ........ .... ...... ...... .... insufficient data ...... up one level ..... clock, .... assort form of a time piece, a quantifying segmented thingy to determine passage of instantaneous event by growers in the approx 22 Million BC prehistory tired of waiting to eat by uncertainty principle establishing varied sticks and stones and contemplation of shadows and applied to meteorite impact and resulting varied weather patterns ... unsuccessful do to cloud cover then later developed by in the box reviewers of same event of needed nutrient growths for human persona late nth century AD to regulate tax collection etal and till used today for same varied principles and in segment of.... seconds .... cross referencing status on astral .... irrelevant ... returning to persona via silver thread .. exit platform
wow where did i go ..
G
Re: Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here)
To get your Ritilin I hope.
[milk shoots out of nose]
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_burnett
yes Matter! transient form without mass moving through the ethereal plane sometimes called the Astra place ... no desire just peace in the all ... floating amazing what shows up just amazing yes indeed just amazing ...
Who? have to say hi an let them know I'm there ... why not?
carefully about epiphanies, they are hard to clean up off the carpet.
fuel? given at the beginning never used up me thinks ..
Second? query what is that? time? Enter query to consciousness ... does not compute ... does not compute .... referencing time .... .... ..... ... ........ .... ...... ...... .... insufficient data ...... up one level ..... clock, .... assort form of a time piece, a quantifying segmented thingy to determine passage of instantaneous event by growers in the approx 22 Million BC prehistory tired of waiting to eat by uncertainty principle establishing varied sticks and stones and contemplation of shadows and applied to meteorite impact and resulting varied weather patterns ... unsuccessful do to cloud cover then later developed by in the box reviewers of same event of needed nutrient growths for human persona late nth century AD to regulate tax collection etal and till used today for same varied principles and in segment of.... seconds .... cross referencing status on astral .... irrelevant ... returning to persona via silver thread .. exit platform
wow where did i go ..
G
Re: Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here)
"The Simple Principle of Conditionalization requires that the acquisition of evidence be representable as changing one's degree of belief in a statement E to one — that is, to certainty. But many philosophers would object to assigning probability of one to any contingent statement, even an evidential statement, because, for example, it is well-known that scientists sometimes give up previously accepted evidence. Jeffrey has proposed a generalization of the Principle of Conditionalization that yields that principle as a special case. Jeffrey's idea is that what is crucial about observation is not that it yields certainty, but that it generates a non-inferential change in the probability of an evidential statement E and its negation ~E (assumed to be the locus of all the non-inferential changes in probability) from initial probabilities between zero and one to Pf(E) and Pf(~E) = [1 − Pf(E)]. Then on Jeffrey's account, after the observation, the rational degree of belief to place in an hypothesis H would be given by the following principle:
"Principle of Jeffrey Conditionalization: Pf(H) = Pi(H/E) × Pf(E) + Pi(H/~E) × Pf(~E) [where E and H are both assumed to have prior probabilities between zero and one.]"
Re: Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBODY
"The Simple Principle of Conditionalization requires that the acquisition of evidence be representable as changing one's degree of belief in a statement E to one — that is, to certainty. But many philosophers would object to assigning probability of one to any contingent statement, even an evidential statement, because, for example, it is well-known that scientists sometimes give up previously accepted evidence. Jeffrey has proposed a generalization of the Principle of Conditionalization that yields that principle as a special case. Jeffrey's idea is that what is crucial about observation is not that it yields certainty, but that it generates a non-inferential change in the probability of an evidential statement E and its negation ~E (assumed to be the locus of all the non-inferential changes in probability) from initial probabilities between zero and one to Pf(E) and Pf(~E) = [1 − Pf(E)]. Then on Jeffrey's account, after the observation, the rational degree of belief to place in an hypothesis H would be given by the following principle:
"Principle of Jeffrey Conditionalization: Pf(H) = Pi(H/E) × Pf(E) + Pi(H/~E) × Pf(~E) [where E and H are both assumed to have prior probabilities between zero and one.]"
This is interesting but the i read the inference that it is where the quantifying of a hypothesis by rational thought is greater then zero and less then one not therefore inclusive to zero or one?
I further have a hard time getting out of the thought that the least possible alternatives or probabilities to a hypothesis is the path to the proof of a hypothesis in rational consideration of the E. Maybe I am wrong or out of the thought here as i usually go.
Very interesting reading.
the further thought would be the way this epistemology developed in era of religious turmoil of doctrine an more in line with theology application or platform then other science and now applied to modern theorem-eulogy of other platform.
Re: Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY
I agree, G.
The one and zero are contextually identical states, and do not exist. What folks believe lies in between.
hi my friend
I have found reading such over a few times is more enlightening.
In consideration of the beliefs we hold -E because E or E+ is ~ then 0 is having no belief by the consciousness and belief is then in between and not inclusive to 0 or E.
There is no "0" when the ALL is or can be aware in some quantifiable degree to stimulus and stimulus being in the ALL compared to a void which in its transient form ever changing to not void state and can only be conditional to time quantified being of varied state.
Re: Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here)
What we believe as reality is a lie in that it is virtual, but I utilize it as real since it has the same stability that the real could have…
— Mortality —
We are chained to Time, to the speed of light,
A fair price in return for ‘existence’;
But, the timeless-formless/potential is free
To conceive all there could be, all at once.
— In No Time—
The probable emerged from the possible,
It’s future already past in an instant,
For everything has already happened,
Although we’re just learning about it now.
— One Sums to the None —
The timeless-formless contains every path,
Though as useless as a library of ALL books;
For, its sum of information is zero,
But, one of these virtualities is ours.
— No-Where and Now-Here —
We shine as unreal and shimmering rainbows,
The stable-virtual still usable as the real,
This differentiation was of potential—
Being there’s no way to ‘freeze’ Nothing.
Re: Nothing by Nobody Nowhere (No Where = Now Here) 
Linear Mode
