[b1rdman]

The parts that I claim to be absolute are simply that solar systems are the atoms that make up the next larger stage of creation. And atoms are solar systems that make up our level.
Again speculative...Muons and quarks and other subatomic particles are most likely the solar systems that make up the atoms at the atomic level of creation. Because our level of creation level a larger level of force, muons simply are not large enough to exist in it.

It's also worth mentioning that there's evidence that an untold number of stars/solar systems exist outside of and between galaxies, but are too small and dim to be observed directly.

The other absolute I proclaim is that the galaxies are cells of the next level of creation. Whether we live in a mulitcelluar organism or a vat of bacteria or "primordial ooze" is pure speculation. I think the location that the Milky Way cell resides is not subjected to a source of light in the next level of creation.

Now to the science of it all...
In order to make this a scientific theory instead of an observational "dogmatic" hypothesis, it will require some tests and predictions.
I've already shown the successful prediction of DNA like structures at the center of galaxies.
I have not mentioned, but it should be evident the prediction that if stars are atoms, most will require electrons/planets. This is being found more accurate everyday.

Here is a relatively new prediction. Roughly 127 basic variations of solar systems exist. One for each of the elements in the periodic table, variations of this 127 are possible but the basic structure should be evident.


The basic structure for them should appear in a variation of this configuration.
2
8
8
18
18
18 (14)
13 (14)

Our own solar system follows this nearly exact although Mars, and Uranus/Neptune raise questions. I explain this through excited electrons and or perhaps an ionic nature of our solar system.
Mercury 2
Venus 8
Earth 8
--Mars (4?)
Jupiter 18
Saturn 18
Uranus 13 (14)
Neptune 18 (14)

One of the basic tests would be to find differrent galactic interactions in space and then subject various cells to reproduced encouters with other, both similar and different, cells and look for simularites. It would help to have access to an atomic microscope (that is a microscope capable of seeing atoms) to find the atomic reactions to the encounter, then compare them to stellar reactions.

It is not "Intelligent" Design, it's Infinite Design.

[b1rdman]

Originally Posted by b1rdman The parts that I claim to be Here is a relatively new prediction. Roughly 127 basic variations of solar systems exist. One for each of the elements in the periodic table, variations of this 127 are possible but the basic structure should be evident.

Correction make that 118 not 127. Of those perhaps 100 are common.

[Profpat]

OK you're excused this time but watch it in the future.

I do like your theory B1rdman.

Best to you,

Pat

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by b1rdman That is my proposition. Profpat, Thank you for pointing out my miswording. I think I used the wrong word when I said fathom. You can fathom or comprehend just about anything. However, the ability to prove anything is extremely limited when you are no more than a speck on an electron. Your experiments and observations are limited to what information is available to you at your particular location and the instruments which you use to make your observations. mkirkpatrick, I think what we call life is energy. What we call energy is life. The two are synonomous in existance, but differ by degree. I'm not sure of the frequency required for energy to become matter, but there is no difference between the two. Energy/Matter cannot be created nor destroyed, only change form. The fact that energy can be turned into matter and matter can be turned into energy tells me that the two are different sides of the same coin. Thank you for your comments, all.

Thanks b1rdman,I agree wholheartedly,that life and energy are one of the samething!

Best of goodfortune to you with your most profound and insightful theory.

warm regards michael.

[b1rdman]

One of the big question I've had is where do black holes fit into this hypothesis.

Black holes fill the role of vacuoles in a cell.
Vacuoles are responsible for removing potentially harzardous material from the cell and transporting it outside of the cell. This would hold true to common conception of the characteristics of a black hole.

[b1rdman]

The first inflation of the universe began immediately following theBig Bang event. The second inflation took place approximately 9 billion years after the Big Bang event.
As I mentioned earlier ~1500 earth years= 1 unversal second, just as 1500 electron revolutions = 1 human second.

In fetuses the yolk sac provides instant nourishment to the fetus/zygot. However, it only has a finite quanitity of material. The umbilical cord begins forming roughly 5 weeks after conception.
This works out to roughly 4.5 billion electron revolutions. This is roughly half the time suggested. However, the gastrointestinal tract isn't completed until the 10th week at which time it protrudes into the umbilical cord. 10 wks works out to roughly 9 billion electron revolutions. Precisely the time needed to allow for the second inflation of the universe.