[G_burnett]

Hi dip

Ty for your response

by the nature of proton split there are forces vectored in the thumbnail in eh-1 as attraction to the particle with quark speed to form the peanut shape before split, note the given direction of the electron shell.

In my platform of most basic thought the lower eh+1 the forces are repel between the two and in this seen to be equal repel upon both form to where a calculated slowing degrade would take place but within for the original overall tube (area of influence) motion, (note the change of direction of the shell in eh+1 advaced particle) in this would be the ponder that light speed can be calculated as double the norm accepted speed if we remove the back push movement by a greater mass clump unmovable or unable to be effected by such greater the mass form .. but in doing such absolute ponder putting the proton in its double, no not double but increased accordingly as absolute motion then the c would remove the advance having nothing to push against in only the speed of the original split emit the factor of that one proton by other then split ... or maybe the view of the tube advance ... in thought of the spookiness postulation of E and paradox created ... maybe there is no sense to this at all but ... I still look for the symmetry in my own head of course. ~ regards Graham...

[dipayankar]

Why doesnt the model rupture at the middle Graham??

Originally Posted by G_burnett Hi dip Ty for your response by the nature of proton split there are forces vectored in the thumbnail in eh-1 as attraction to the particle with quark speed to form the peanut shape before split, note the given direction of the electron shell. In my platform of most basic thought the lower eh+1 the forces are repel between the two and in this seen to be equal repel upon both form to where a calculated slowing degrade would take place but within for the original overall tube (area of influence) motion, (note the change of direction of the shell in eh+1 advaced particle) in this would be the ponder that light speed can be calculated as double the norm accepted speed if we remove the back push movement by a greater mass clump unmovable or unable to be effected by such greater the mass form .. but in doing such absolute ponder putting the proton in its double, no not double but increased accordingly as absolute motion then the c would remove the advance having nothing to push against in only the speed of the original split emit the factor of that one proton by other then split ... or maybe the view of the tube advance ... in thought of the spookiness postulation of E and paradox created ... maybe there is no sense to this at all but ... I still look for the symmetry in my own head of course. ~ regards Graham...

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Why doesnt the model rupture at the middle Graham??

The nature of the shell understood as a function of the nucleus. It can naught else. G

[analog]

Hey Dave,

Has any of your number crunching ever led you to believe that the entire universe (FS/aether) would have a type of Schwarzschild radius, whereby any lesser degree of expansion (after the initial event/bang/collision) inevitably reverts all random motion back to total uniform linear motion (through the process of structured matter formed by angular momentum) as it was in the initial absolute zero state, but once that degree of expansion (radius) is exceeded, all uniform motions are doomed to eventually become totally randomized causing the universe to forever be in a state of expansion; thus the initial state of absolute zero will never be universal again?

Do you think there is currently enough structured matter formed by angular momentum (uniform motion) to eventually slow the expansion (caused by random motion) and revert it back to a condensing universe causing an increasing spatial density; thus a universal blueshift of propagating light?

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Why doesnt the model rupture at the middle Graham??

Hi dipayankar;

Do a thought experiment that the spheroid of viscous mass is consolidated by external repelling electromagnetic field that compresses the matter in a medium. An analogy is an air bubble in water; the bubble is carried in the liquid medium and is held within the medium by absolute motion of the medium whirling on an angular momentum in turbulence.

In absolute motion the spheroid/bubble of viscous mass will be elongated when stretched as a result of acceleration caused by inertial force, forms as a peanut shape geometrical structure as Graham put it. In this model you can visualize how a suspended spheroid of viscous mass that forms in constant expanding and compressing forces is interacting in absolute motion of the medium. When the peanut shape spheroid/bubble splits on increasing momentum, the valence shell of the spheroid would reconnect as a result of being under pressure in the medium (the medium is also viscous mass, such as liquid/air/plasma/Aether/FS). In a dynamic compression of the peanut shape spheroid splitting in the medium it therefore forms as two separated spheroids/bubbles; under these circumstances it will not rupture. This rule one of Graham's theory is a universal model for all state of matter.

Graham please advise if the above has not sufficiently elaborated on the idea for your rule one.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo Hi dipayankar; Do a thought experiment that the spheroid of viscous mass is consolidated by external repelling electromagnetic field that compresses the matter in a medium. An analogy is an air bubble in water; the bubble is carried in the liquid medium and is held within the medium by absolute motion of the medium whirling on an angular momentum in turbulence. In absolute motion the spheroid/bubble of viscous mass will be elongated when stretched as a result of acceleration caused by inertial force, forms as a peanut shape geometrical structure as Graham put it. In this model you can visualize how a suspended spheroid of viscous mass that forms in constant expanding and compressing forces is interacting in absolute motion of the medium. When the peanut shape spheroid/bubble splits on increasing momentum, the valence shell of the spheroid would reconnect under pressure in the medium (the medium are also viscous mass, such as liquid/plasma/Aether/FS). In a dynamic compression in the medium it therefore forms as two separated spheroids/bubbles; it will not rupture. This rule one of Graham's theory is a universal model for all state of matter. Graham please advise if the above has not sufficiently elaborated on the idea for your rule one.

Yes Vincent, you did a good elaboration, ty, i was going to get into the condense more with the model and leave out the spin factors to keep it simple but was having a hard time with it without the spin added to the 1d model axis where my head is these days, the laying down effect to how far would depend on the velocity an absolute motion in this case in point in of low external forces and should be uniform to a frequency as the peanut shape would be constant form for the event, there would seem to be a form twist/spin factor involved and that would still allow for the vertical event horizon but on a shifted axis real peanut shape and snap back to vertical as this is the MF perpendicular axis not so much the forward particle mass axis .. is this the EH +1 frame drag elasticity manifest... yes, in my own head,

and there would not be a burst due to the environment/compression state of the form .. Regards Graham

[austintorn@aol.com]

Graham and all,

Maybe there are two types of hydrogens molecules (called para and ortho or something) because in one a nucleon is flipped and so the energy going around, which are electron(s), travels in a figure 8, and in the other non flipped case it goes around in more of an oval.

The proportions of these two type of hydrogen molecules changes as they are heated and so maybe one then gets converted to the other, since one of the two types of bonding is stronger.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com Graham and all, Maybe there are two types of hydrogens molecules (called para and ortho or something) because in one a nucleon is flipped and so the energy going around, which are electron(s), travels in a figure 8, and in the other non flipped case it goes around in more of an oval. The proportions of these two type of hydrogen molecules changes as they are heated and so maybe one then gets converted to the other, since one of the two types of bonding is stronger.

I have a hard time understanding your post ... The only comparison Dip I have to this is the more recent recognized model of quark in motion and dependent on the speed of motion the shape is there and infinite to shape of form ... thus said being in the void which does and does not exist ... or to then other influence on the form that does effect, so now up a bit further in the molecular i have a view not so much as what the electron looks like as a dot but the line then the envelopment and the elasticity of envelopment. Then from perspective of the pulse, ... and the condense, these shapes are still in infancy to be determined. The certs the oval the peanut ... so many ...

Are you above making reference to hard water molecules? peace Graham

[austintorn@aol.com]

No water, just reference to H2, I guess, no oxygen. Got some of it from reading Fluid Energy Theory and the figure '8' clicked.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com No water, just reference to H2, I guess, no oxygen. Got some of it from reading Fluid Energy Theory and the figure '8' clicked.

Hi Austin;

This is where quark motion variances get into the picture and i am not quite there yet as the condense of the nucleus released from condensed state then varies the wave function to shape change based on ... quark speed manifest in the clump ... open the figure eight with a reverse twist and you have a circle, ... this is 1d still and in a heated state while in the 8 and condensed in the spheroid shape? It twists in to the 8 or peanut shape due to the vortical particle spin of axis tumbling ... this is the helix creation root in my own mind ..maybe different after coffee thsi morning ~regards G