I would have to write a book to respond to your last two posts
I figure as my questions and comments dig deeper into the system, I'll open my mailbox one day to find a brand new first edition copy; just to shut me up for a while.
I'll be expecting it to be signed by the author with a nicely worded inscription also (see spelling of full name below).
Perhaps, I can put some of these concepts to a visual representation. It would certainly help. I'll have to do a bit of research and get some feedback from you as we go. I'll post them if I come up with anything good.
Graham, what you said augurs well for hot plasma systems. However how do we diefferntiate the properties for cold plasma (suppose aether was plasma).
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_burnett
It is hard to relate without a revisit for clarity. The potential for plasma tic detection in a defined realm or potential for plasma effect or potential for plasma fusion gives rise to the use of the word plasma ... but the realm we use it in has varied identity demand... not the event of plasma creation or +1 state of the realm ... plasma is not the matter being thrown into the fire but the fire itself once lit function of event ... lighting the fire is the event, when it ignites, staying at the temperature then needed to support the fire is dependent on the realm containment and the wood addition is the feeding of the fire with condensed (frozen) hydrogen the fuel... we are using the term plasma because of the high heat involved and being so high to actual type of particle change .. in the fire it is the excitement of electrons an release of electron/radiant wave ... an accelerated aging process of decay ... but with plasma event it is change and not so a decay of the particle form as we are using base atomic particle being cleaner to event +1 .. sort of ...
So no, in the sort of event there is the quantification of event different by particle variation but the event is basic the same ... the reaction to the containment realm of release of neutron in the hydrogen plasma event, the motion of the neutron from that event of release gives direction to the neutron as mass to enter the shell of containment or to say fuse with the matter the wall is made up with exciting the molecular structure of the wall in the process to where the neutron finds its station and in this fusion in the wall the excited state of the atom of the wall is detectable usable radiant heat emit.
The predictability of the neutron release is done by alignment of charge by magnetic field shape so when the event in a hydrogen plasma fusion reactor takes place the neutron without charge is release in a certain direction from the prior alignment ... further controlled by hydrogen atom mix the motion of vortical spin -1 of the event. maintained after the event as well ... they seem to have the direction of the neutron emit down pat by trial and error mostly, but they have made many inroads to the wall composition or receiving end of the released neutron particle mass ... I hope this makes sense of things a bit better as it is not complete ... the impurities of the hydrogen fuel clump and wall receiver greatly effect the ability to contain the effect as this creates a brittleness of the wall and once containment is lost so is the possibility of fusion effect. .. the neutrons just keep going as the wall is breached and the fire is not able to maintain itself in a needed realm of ignition state ... there is no oven effect with no walls ...
I hope this is better of a post or clarity ~ Graham
Graham, what you said augurs well for hot plasma systems. However how do we diefferntiate the properties for cold plasma (suppose aether was plasma).
only in the +1 state of fusion and cold fusion? ... how about mental processing along cell paths containment by the chemical process of emit? no wall there for the neutrons and they just leave sort of ..? ~ graham
Hi Tim, Allen and all, i was having a late night moment of quiet thought and ponder thought to share as relevant here in maybe some small way for reply.
The collegiate faculty of Princeton and student body of study in science describe particle mass having an opposite in nature of charge, Matter and Antimatter. For the example, a positron having a positive charge equates in mass to an anti positron or negative charged positron mass.
Further postulated is that when anti matter and matter meet there is instant annihilation and release of pure energy. Other study has created in chambers anti hydrogen atoms that do this as they reach the containment in chambers wall by having freedom outside of the ability of the field created to contain the positive atom, to annihilation and in fact produced the effect to some million of anti H being created, not an isolated event at one time.
This is not where this present is of ponder. Anti matter/matter energy reactor creation of energy for use is not my case in point. What is the ponder be the question can there be a change of matter type of charge perceived, positron changed to anti positron or changed back again without the anti matter annihilation release of energy.
Thus in making use of anti matter to create matter the alchemists dream.
Harvard faculty and student body of study in science discipline outdid Princeton by taking a particle form with positive charge, in transient motion and brought it to absolute rest in an aligned condensed sodium clump and by ending the condense effect of the sodium the mass of transient form stopped continued on its way. The transient particle form was a proton mass with positive charge. Was the source of the proton turned on at the time of the release from of the condensed state of the sodium atom clump? Did the particle have the directional energy behind the proton mass contained? We will not go there either at this time of ponder.
It is sufficient to subscribe the positive proton mass was held in place with energy still behind it denied work and either turned off or still on after coming to rest in sodium crystal aligned condense.
We will go to the postulation of what constitutes a charge description qualification of a body or mass particle. What gives the particle mass unit the qualification of being positive or negative? To the answer we must look to the composition of the particle. The quark nature of the positron having motion within the boundaries of the unit of mass … in direction. We will not go into the ponder of sets of quark variation composition past the realization that there is such variation possible. Nor the varied speed of the quark composition that may shape the proton to varied form of mass containment shape.
As in the beginning of this prediction the ponder subject is matter anti matter thus said the scale of platform is the matter form of where there is electrons, protons and neutrons making up a matter atomic of mass. In this collective the above postulation on matter where there is a positron particle of mass as above described to lead in further. This is where the motion of the positron and electron and with neutron in resonant form of a sync example gives us matter.
Now there comes into the picture the neutron as a particle of the atomic clump. Where we have a positive charged proton and a negative charged electron how can we qualify the neutron having no charge. What direction ponder further is the direction overall the picture and this is and must be qualified as having nature of by spin. The spin of the proton(positive), the spin of the electron(negative) opposite to the spin of the proton and no spin of the neutron within the confines of the structure as to what constitutes spin by quark makeup of motion.
There by predicable anti matter must have opposite spin perceived somewhere in the structure of the atomic mass and thus a combined unit of anti spin in the electron motion and the proton motion. The neutron with no charge, being of the function of the Proton and Electron in motion would in anti matter have the same purpose but with motion effect reversed in the anti matter atomic and when released maintaining the reverse as such might be a comprisable release in fusion reactor. We will not go there either in this presentation of ponders. … other then to say there are these effects on the atomic sync notable.
Where we will go is back to the consideration that all the spin for all the particle must be reversed in the anti matter form.
The question arises from that if a water drop was in motion outside of influence such as gravity or force other then internal, what could be the prediction when released from condensed state? A clump movement seen in weightlessness can be considered for the example but from only a mix of non solution able material mix having spin by reactive attractive and repulse effect in the water creating the movement(such as quark), and entering a suitable form of aligned crystallization structure being condensed state of a degree still allowing for entry, then further tweaked in condense.
As the de-alignment would be gradual, the slowed and prior stopped drop would continue out of the crystallized form losing aligned condensed cohesion. In the case of a proton the prediction would be a bright singular flash emit the force turned off prior to de-condense. The emit direction if de-alignment was varied in speed would come out, of the crystal, just some where. Thus said emit duration or intensity, will be to the amount of condensed proton mass in the structure.
Or, one can predict the effect of emit in all directions in a brief flash perceived time relative. We will not look at this at this ponder other then to note it will happen be an effect by nature of event of condensation/de-condensation.
Some one else can add here the rest to create anti matter now. For when you do, and understand the event, you can create matter, the prediction. ~regards Graham
(further discussion can be given as needed but to the preferred award of honorarium as mass in my larder is near devoid of form)
Hi Graham;
Do you have a link to these Harvard and Princeton studies?
You might keep in mind that this thread is promoting the idea that energy, matter, and anti-matter are all made from a single fundamental substance of the universe. The real question is: "What interactions of this substance’s properties is capable of producing the phenomena of charge and energy (along with all the other forces of nature)?"
If annihilation meant that the particle / anti-particle interaction resulted in the removal of the particles and their substance from the universe, then this would infer an existence of multiple forms of fundamental substance. The interaction however, results in the formation of radiant energy and thus it is just a conversion process of the fundamental substance’s property states of motion and bonding.
BTW: A positron IS the anti-particle of the electron.
Hi Graham; Do you have a link to these Harvard and Princeton studies?
You might keep in mind that this thread is promoting the idea that energy, matter, and anti-matter are all made from a single fundamental substance of the universe. The real question is: "What interactions of this substance’s properties is capable of producing the phenomena of charge and energy (along with all the other forces of nature)?"
If annihilation meant that the particle / anti-particle interaction resulted in the removal of the particles and their substance from the universe, then this would infer an existence of multiple forms of fundamental substance. The interaction however, results in the formation of radiant energy and thus it is just a conversion process of the fundamental substance’s property states of motion and bonding.
BTW: A positron IS the anti-particle of the electron.
the above two are Berkly and i think the Princeton one as well was from there.
"a positron IS the anti Particle of the electron" ..
I have a hard time with as in a true define of anti matter the composite would be for a recognition of anti proton anti electron and a neutron .. or having in the first two different charge? yes i know but then mass is mass and is the thought here ... from the stand of being on matter not anti matter the highlight is correct statement but the other i would have to beg to differ.
The reason for this is the nature of charge being dependent qualification by spin? IMHO ~ graham
Last edited by G_burnett; 08-02-2008 at 07:46 PM.
Reason: spelling
Hi Graham; Do you have a link to these Harvard and Princeton studies?
You might keep in mind that this thread is promoting the idea that energy, matter, and anti-matter are all made from a single fundamental substance of the universe. The real question is: "What interactions of this substance’s properties is capable of producing the phenomena of charge and energy (along with all the other forces of nature)?"
If annihilation meant that the particle / anti-particle interaction resulted in the removal of the particles and their substance from the universe, then this would infer an existence of multiple forms of fundamental substance. The interaction however, results in the formation of radiant energy and thus it is just a conversion process of the fundamental substance’s property states of motion and bonding.
BTW: A positron IS the anti-particle of the electron.
I did not do a very good reply being pressed for time today so i will revisit your post here.
The idea of multiple forms of fundamental substance infer is in consideration that energy in said profound thought perhaps, can be considered non mass when in motion form a transient state. Do we notice a build of mass when the event is annihilation or energy emit to gluon? Is this absolute rest of reversed spin particle mass no longer in transient form? no it goes from a gluon to +T and -t coming out of joined spin by the inability of the gluon to maintain spin motion but it is changed when coming apart ... motion condensed or expanded? Expanded ... from the condensed state of the two original particles join event ... alignment in spin ... no alignment after and with less condense... wave will not effect the wave but effect the mass and in this case of instantaneous join of anti quark and positive quark it is not an add but a loss of spin and gain of mass by effect expansion ... I can go further but maybe you can catch the ponder i have with this better. Thus said the energy still exists anti and not anti, mass is still an exist in state of transient form energy ...?
kind regards graham
Are you trying to say that neurons use plasma for communication???
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_burnett
only in the +1 state of fusion and cold fusion? ... how about mental processing along cell paths containment by the chemical process of emit? no wall there for the neutrons and they just leave sort of ..? ~ graham
Are you trying to say that neurons use plasma for communication???
The thought i had was that if cold fusion is the interaction of such chemical molecular form that there is a release of a neutron to out of cellular containment attachment available ... this randomness movement of the neutron that could go any way out of the cellular boundaries of containment will attach to as per the brain has developed form of mass to allow attachment ... in the quadrant or receiver development due to evote need of receivership ... there in the process that would "seem" chaotic is with form receiver dependent only on having the neutron oncoming the fact when and not a matter of dependency ... if there is enough generation the prediction will be that there will be a release that hits as needed ... the evote of receiver(s) then is the factor not the emit ... probably not too clear here my direction of thought given but .. ? IMHO ~ regards graham
Timothy Lester
Linear Mode
