[G_burnett]

In (Pic.3.) you can note the varied color of particle form pictured to represent the varied quark perception of notability here and future consideration of predictability allowance by evidentially examination, to hypothesis presented expected.

This reasoning of predictability increasing with time to find the particle where predicted is therefore as in (pic.2) represented in simplicity format where I depict the form as fluid until perceived, transient until depicted, having axis spin by polarity mass form interaction at any given perception event and transient form spin, until interaction with other field or particle form, overall in varied wave length and possibly dependent on other vertical interaction fields in the ALL.
There is further in thus I subscribe, to, the particle form predictable of having “no charge,” “no spin,” “no axis,” and “non transient, having mass” but influenced by other type “form” “no matter of mass or with mass” ever in the universe the form may be except in varied locations of “void” where such is filled and emptied simultaneously to perception in a state of plus 1 or negative one but never 0.

This void which by the nature of being filled then not void possible to effect the vector except as being devoid of form as form is transient in always either in a plus one instant of leaving a void or minus one instantaneity of existence of void/not void and therefore in pictorial here static form having direction being the receiver of force in from an “external” form in nature and to complete the boundaries being effected by its own nature of quark and wave where the effect event will be noticeable more readily being the size that is observed.

As such this particle form would have the perception of being with charge, axis, fluidness, momentum, direction and in direction with axis perceived transient particle form/wave form but is neutral with out charge except by it having transient form + from its beginning and – at its end or reversed dependent on perception. Thus I perceive the base of a transient particle being in motion possibly with mass perceptible bcause it is large and slow to the platform of viewing.

Vectoring examples will be kept in the simple perception in the same manner of particle form. The below pictorial labelled rule one shows two particle rays A+ an b- in parallel direction and in having charge with axis spin in the transient wave form, be then represented as having an opposite direction. They are being transacted at a point on a vertical line to vector forces as they might apply to the array still indicative of where the event takes place. These interacting vertical forces are universal in nature but remember please that the event horizon predicted will in this view preclude particle form beyond the direction pictured and the point of interaction along the vertical axis.

The interacting forces are shown with ray c1 c2 d1 d2 where each force can be positive or negative, external or internal (sourly relative to the nature of A+ b- transient form).




An event horizon will be where A+ b- interact as transient form particle stream, the center of it ALL or on a horizontal plane intersecting the vertical axis.

In interacting the first question must be by what force. The force if you must quantify it can be described by what ever name you wish to give it. Including time for those with watches and calendars and if you find in need of such measurements.

Gravity, magnetic, momentum, spin, emotional, up to you, but here and now ignore the force and keep it in the back of your mind for what ever platform you are on.

The above shows rays A+ and b- coming together by attraction to conjecture view vertical in effect to the forces of attraction to opposite polar by the nature of the set (A+ b-) transient form being in the nature of the transient ray form having spin. I do not like to use the word spin as on the horizontal axis it is more an orbital wave form on the plane of a frequency.

[G_burnett]

In transient form I put forward above, the wave of the form is now varied, created here noted as -1 to the event but in variation, of wave length it will be a variation from the beginning to the end of the form and then eventually predictable.

In a proton platform the change in wave form allows for visual notation by the natural human persona and after the event even more dense wave form visual effect in a vortex to original wave form.

Other particle form and conditions give varied effect notable to the direction of the orbit spin but in the boundaries to the event horizon.
The event horizon now is where b- and A+ are coming together in an event where on the vertical plane they have created a vertical singularity vortex, positive or negative quantity equal to the quantum of the attractive forces of the particle streams in transient spin form and the closer they get to the horizon so the particles do join in a brief kiss being of similar mass if perceived and measured but only to instantaneous change axis polarity near the speed of light and be directed in the vortex to different direction.

Possible wave frequency, density, momentum, by perspective snap back to wave form or by new quark composition for some examples will change each transient particle nature being thus in the fluid state having varied wave length.

In the proton example one would see visual spectrum of light variance and a snapshot change of visual spectrum as the event is instantaneous but the wave change is not without compression by c2 forces and expansion by c1. The vortex is a slave to the event in being created by the kiss event and what follows.

The next picture is to show the direction of the transient particle form after the event.


This is the aurora borealis event. No longer is the purple particle form stream coming from the horizontal plane nor is the blue coming from the horizontal but each are coming from the event.

Note how the wave form of both transient form are in ordered form or resonant with each other and with all the characteristics of a never starting never ending transient particle form but there beginning was on the event horizon with intensity equal to the combined two single thread nature A+ or b- but with one addition of consideration.

The momentum of the two transient particles coming together will make the spin they have for a factor for addition or in now the new movement or wave form the particles spin is effected by the others spin.

With out mass being in transient form it would not be an addition factor but on the event when the transient form meets the other the mass comes into existence no longer having the direction.

When instead of a kiss it is a waltz they have and sharing perhaps varied particle form composition … the spin though increased in the dance in expansion is soloed out of the event horizon such as the refraction factor in a prism and in a decreased vortex effect that will see the transient form slowly wave frequency to mass in nature by vertical forces below the event and above.

The change in direction is where the visual effect perceived is that of varied frequency or color perception but is only direction varied and one frequency rotating in the vortex perceived by different views on a singular platform and carried to varied wave form perception by distance traveled under other forces such example of frictional nature for a decrease in the vortex to a horn in increasingly smaller spin with loss of momentum used up in the dance.

more below

[G_burnett]

This would be taken one step further to indicate then the event horizon being the creation of a particle transient form stream with the features of both A+ b- having origin at the event horizon, or a neutron particle form as the streams rotate in all eight dimensions an travel through them ALL.

If we explore the black hole creation the question must be the quantities measure of particle stream A+ b- at the event horizon as is needed to create the duel axis collapse vortex shown maybe. The secondary consideration will be the wave form spin after the event. I would further consider that the rule meets both Gravitomagnetism and EMF theorem where in this event of burnett’s rule one two same particles of mass in relativistic static form are still moving in relation to the universe expansion and therefore in transient slow form with Mass > fluidity non mass form the effect is the same. The EMF repel factor of two similar particle form is as such in the transgenic form fluidic overridden by the parallel direction of two transient forms becoming opposite and attractive to each other by the spin and axis perceptions. Frame dragging inertia along a linear plane with spin and wave form applied can by vectoring be expressed in pictorial form.

Move ones hand linear two parts forward and one back with a spin to your arm and vary the spin and you get the effect of drag. In the first pictorial #3 above you can visualise the effect as the particle form if in mass state as shown condenses and expands in form and moves along the linear wave creating the back wash of drag as it turns on the wave inertia constant.

In the event of a positive proton stream coming parallel to a negative stream the proton is greater in size to positron and electron streams in a wave that will resonant with an attraction and attract as negative positive forces will. The positron being anti electron or an electron with similar charge to the proton travelling in parallel linear opposite direction will react with attraction but in the event of being in the same direction the spin reversal of anti electron in the wave form reversed will attract to the proton or electron and comes not from out of time but the positron comes from out of linear perception to a perpendicular parallel linear vector to the event horizon. The registry of the positron is registry of the change of direction perception and not out of time. Any snapshot will show the positron and you will think it to be a free radical electron and just your perspective reversed but it is a positron and I believe notable in the future development of registry relative to vectoring of the event.

What we do know further that with the frictional forces for example the wave transient particle form slows in a spiral vortex cone to become as to have mass perceivable at the end of the cone momentum curtailed by other. This can be the creation of a black hole if in sufficient mass incapable of emitting and now a measurable event dependent on quantum measurement of the transient particle form interaction the factor of predictability.

The purpose for this viewing and creation of vectors was to vector a vortex. It is in relativity to a c- force that the vortex is created in nature but in space the event has variables of d1 d2 c1 and c2 sets effecting rule one basic. In the event horizon +2 the event is secondary to the event happening in circles all around itself as part of a group that can be rotating as well, centered by a massive c- field to making thus a gravity well or a c- force opening of the vortex or combined effect of with d1 d2 rays.

It was to further give rise to consideration to the stored energy in this world in varied fluid transitional states and out there available for use in passive manner of mechanical form creation of compression and vary to a perpendicular use where such a directional cold fusion change taking place by perpendicular variation of particle transient can be made use of in varied application.

I believe that there has to be ways of utilizing the fields of transient form held in relative static form and by saying this passive interaction by parallel event described

If the anti gravitational platform is to be built we must realise the event described above that takes place that transcends the horizontal to the vertical. As the event gives equal credence to duel vectors one up and one down of equal force the matter might tend to be in the way of redirection of the top force going up and letting the bottom directive vector and vortex do its job of lifting the platform or vice versa by mass collection at the top higher then the mass below or collection of gravitomagnetic forces from outside the planetary realm we are stuck on.

I will leave that up to the math wizards, in saying that I could use an assistant partner in this field of science to bother the formulas down and see how they work out.


The fringe science factor of mixing up the gravitomagnetic and EMF I do not.

I believe the vectoring of gravity fields will hold true to this effect of rule one applied changing the gravity field to vertical spinning vortex effect in two celestial bodies with axis spin passing in opposite directions parallel and producing an anti gravity effect to the mass parallel to where they become one unit of mass to consider but not in a repel such as like poles in magnetic interaction.

The graviomagnetic event vectored using rule one is a combination event of massive proportional consideration that includes in my hypothesis that it is these large celestial bodies, of big mass > +transient minor form, that form the black holes as the dance of the mass continues to varied time that allow for a permanent union momentum changed where jet fluid form emissions of freed radical dispersal changing more the dancing form to collapse into one for even more dispersal, the wheel of wave form formation in a singularity giving from the event horizon is further indicative of an event as per rule one vector.

The event horizon is the same but what escapes in the jets are the parallel vector creation by the event, the slow moving mass the carrier in this case of particle transient.

The smashing of multiple bodies of any size understanding the uncertainty principle to predict in any accuracy where or what bodies will collide in the meld leaves the absurdity that some will be parallel to the oncoming form prior to smashing events and after some are taking place. The instantaneous event of rule one and vortex creation combined with the smashing heightens the probability that a black hole will form exponentially.

How much mass is needed to form the hole? Is it the dance of the muon?

I believe this to be the main query of interest and am with the answer of the event being two particle forms that will interact as in rule one to a “continued” dance, on a horizontal plane and as they deteriorate into one form and emit the carried form in jet stream wave emission. Yes, I know this is cold fusion described.

Then from there we have the forms interacting with each other as inertia fusion begins to create more mass quantities in the grouping and collecting losing all containment in jet stream emitter molecular perpendicular dismemberment both directions from the plate no man made magnetic field will contain other then to aid the event formation. (I had to throw that in to the smashing project Vincent)

I am a bit at a loss to add more without comment by others as the all is a BIG subject, replies will be to the rule one pictorial above posted referenced.

Sorry all that it seems very hurried but I am looking at some further things.

oh an Vincent I seem to be in a grand mah situation with the order of my ceramics so will act accordingly and order them from other then US ... probably the forums have been monitored with all the brains here lol

Peace! ~ Graham

[G_burnett]

Hi my friend again

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...rk-energy.html

very good article had to share! Enjoy all.

Peace~ Graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi dipayankar; it would be the compatible relationship of singular vortex mechanism with quantum mechanics and understand the structure of a galaxy to relook at galactic gravity. On this issue that based on UVS it has comprehensively explains in a single model that unifies the the four fundamental forces of nature, this comprehensive explanation is supported with evidence on those related mysterious phenomena in the single model.

Originally Posted by dipayankar Okay, how would you marry quantum mechanics with the special theory of relativity using vortex?

[dipayankar]

Hi Vincent, would you mean that probably the various forces would form the various arms of the vortex??

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo Hi dipayankar; it would be the compatible relationship of singular vortex mechanism with quantum mechanics and understand the structure of a galaxy to relook at galactic gravity. On this issue that based on UVS it has comprehensively explains in a single model that unifies the the four fundamental forces of nature, this comprehensive explanation is supported with evidence on those related mysterious phenomena in the single model.

[G_burnett]

hi Vincent and all,

heres a corkscrew for thought

http://blackholes.stardate.org/direc...p?id=33&img=96

they have a lot of pictures here for star gazers ..

Graham

[dipayankar]

Thats a very interesting picture. I wonder why this type of geomentry was formed.

Originally Posted by G_burnett hi Vincent and all, heres a corkscrew for thought http://blackholes.stardate.org/direc...p?id=33&img=96 they have a lot of pictures here for star gazers .. Graham

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Thats a very interesting picture. I wonder why this type of geomentry was formed.

good question but the slow ejection compared to a fast jet stream? The spin being slow relative as compared to other BIG events.. how about a two form spin? ... this could be a thread in itself .. or its more spin then others .. I do not see it in nature to much like this but the rear end of a flamer in the old days i think had it in rocketry before they got so high tec and the spin of the rocket caused the exhaust to look like this .. some other pics there showed the grab of energy from sister sources and maybe this is a left over drag of the energy not fully taken in .. i really do not know dip ..

~peace G

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by G_burnett hi Vincent and all, heres a corkscrew for thought http://blackholes.stardate.org/direc...p?id=33&img=96 they have a lot of pictures here for star gazers .. Graham

Hi Graham;

This info is good. This is an evidence I was looking for to describe the vortical interactions of the Cat eye's nebula. It was believed that this nebula was a binary star system that revolve in a center of mass, however, there was no direct evidence to this.



The binary star system SS 433 in the constellation Aquila is a supporting evidence that Cat eye's nebula is a binary star system that therefore has this similar type of asymmetrical vortical patterns.

The force interactions for Cat eye's nebula and SS 433can be comprehensively explained based on singular vortex mechanism.

Will come back with the details on this later, rushing to an appointment now.

Thanks.