[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo Hi Graham; This info is good. This is an evidence I was looking for to describe the vortical interactions of the Cat eye's nebula. It was believed that this nebula was a binary star system that revolve in a center of mass, however, there was no direct evidence to this. ..... .......in the constellation Aquila is a supporting evidence that Cat eye's nebula is a binary star system that therefore has this similar type of asymmetrical vortical patterns. The force interactions for Cat eye's nebula and SS 433can be comprehensively explained based on singular vortex mechanism. Will come back with the details on this later, rushing to an appointment now. Thanks.

I have been at study to the surface of Sol to see if the planetary alignment would be creating a vortex effect of repel across the space involved and have located two areas indicative of sunspot creation through gamma ray register taking place or having taken place by the push effect.

there are two relative close to each other areas to note

RA: 05h 18m 26sec
Dec: 23:10: 17

Following event indicate a calculated return to sol of particle streams at

RA: 05h 18m 41sec
Dec 23: 10: 30

but without format of what planet will create this arch flare emit to sunspot creation the flare may start at either and end at the either/other dependent on how the alignment is coming across the sun.

Venus may be the factor where its push outward is pushing in the sun surface at these locations as it may be pushed toward the sun by other push as on the surface there is a clear indication of circulars indentation taking place. Un able to see the effect of surface rise on Venus on the side facing the sun we can look at the effect on sides of planets, specific the gas giants where we can see the rise of vortex creation no longer being pushed, by the planets in the way of the sun.
The new eye of Jupiter forming may be a starting point for calculation?
In the rotation of Venus there may be observable after the event of creation of vortex as well.

I say Jupiter in further note that the relationship of the new eye and the new sunspot are in relative proximity to the older sunspot and older eyes.

Vectoring the effect will be attempted if the event takes place as a personal interest to give rise to calculation then of dark energy/push effect which I am leaning toward marry. I have limited means and access at this point but perhaps other can review if they look.

Enjoy I hope the ponder.

~peace graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Hi Vincent, would you mean that probably the various forces would form the various arms of the vortex??

Hi dipayankar; I would not say the various forces would form the various arms of the vortex. Based on UVS, I would suggest the paradigm of vortical interactions in suspended spheroids is the mother of all forces, refering to the four fundamental forces of nature.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by G_burnett I have been at study to the surface of Sol to see if the planetary alignment would be creating a vortex effect of repel across the space involved and have located two areas indicative of sunspot creation through gamma ray register taking place or having taken place by the push effect. there are two relative close to each other areas to note RA: 05h 18m 26sec Dec: 23:10: 17 Following event indicate a calculated return to sol of particle streams at RA: 05h 18m 41sec Dec 23: 10: 30 but without format of what planet will create this arch flare emit to sunspot creation the flare may start at either and end at the either/other dependent on how the alignment is coming across the sun.

Would you be kind enough to state the GMT time and the coordinates on Earth when observing this event on Sun. I would then be able to construct the snapshot of the solar systems objects in the sky map to see the planetary force interactions you are referring to.

Originally Posted by G_burnett Venus may be the factor where its push outward is pushing in the sun surface at these locations as it may be pushed toward the sun by other push as on the surface there is a clear indication of circulars indentation taking place. Unable to see the effect of surface rise on Venus on the side facing the sun we can look at the effect on sides of planets, specific the gas giants where we can see the rise of vortex creation no longer being pushed, by the planets in the way of the sun. The new eye of Jupiter forming may be a starting point for calculation? In the rotation of Venus there may be observable after the event of creation of vortex as well. I say Jupiter in further note that the relationship of the new eye and the new sunspot are in relative proximity to the older sunspot and older eyes. Vectoring the effect will be attempted if the event takes place as a personal interest to give rise to calculation then of dark energy/push effect which I am leaning toward marry. I have limited means and access at this point but perhaps other can review if they look. Enjoy I hope the ponder. ~peace graham

This pondering on gravity as a push-in force for planet and Sun gravitational interactions is very wonderful.

Jupiter new eye formation based on UVS is caused by focused interplanetary gravities, its moons and Sun. However, without sophisticated observation equipments to probe into this there is no way to be certain on what objects exactly in the solar system was the cause for this new eye of Jupiter. A sunspot does not track a rotating Jupiter would be a too remote cause to have triggered this new eye on Jupiter, I would think the triggering mechanism to be focus gravities of a solar system alignment, Sun or Venus might play a main role in the alignment.

Thanks.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo Would you be kind enough to state the GMT time and the coordinates on Earth when observing this event on Sun. I would then be able to construct the snapshot of the solar systems objects in the sky map to see the planetary force interactions you are referring to...... Thanks.

Thanks for the reply Vincent

I am really in the preliminary and requesting same from the WW Telescope feed and I will pass it on to you when they respond. I did not have it set to my location just getting use to the site.

Graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi, for all who are looking at the binary star system SS433 that displayed a corkscrew geometrical pattern and pondering on the vectoring, this is an explanation based on singular vortex mechanism, described through Cat's Eye nebula that has a similar pattern with other compelling details that supports the UVS concept.

http://blackholes.stardate.org/direc...p?id=33&img=96




The right image shows a false-color picture, processed to reveal the enormous but extremely faint halo of gaseous material, over three light-years across, which surrounds the planetary nebula. Excerpt from NASA - Astronomy picture of the day.

This is an evidence that suggest there is a huge suspended spheroid of viscous matter encasing the nebula. Based on UVS, the rings suggest this is a top view on a polar region, these rings are the layers of taro shape magnetospheres of the binary star system. The spokes supposedly are long and thin satellite vortices formed around a huge polar vortex, this also infer a huge spheroid of plasmic matter is encompassing the binary star system. With this suspended spheroid of viscous mass established, the vortices formed in its viscous mass can then be comprehended logically.

The pair of spiral arms suggest that the centre mass of this binary star system is rotating in anti-clockwise direction from this view. It is quite clear in the left image that the spiral arms are vortices and they are nicely formed. The invisible counter part of this visible dwarf star in the center is suspected to be a brown dwarf, the pair rotate and wobbles around each other in a common center. While one of the suspended spheroids is projecting forward in an angular momentum subjected to a cyclonical gravity field effect of the other suspended spheroid, the spheroid would thrust its lighter viscous mass vortically backward in the forward projection of its main mass, forming the very distinct vortical spiral arm as it has displayed. The similar effect on the other suspended spheroid within a common viscous mass in a mirrored manner would form the other vortical spiral arm in opposite direction, hence this opposite phases of vortices in corkscrew pattern are formed in a wobbling manner. This phenomenon is very similar to SS433 that are known to be a binary star system. Take a close look at these large vortices just inside their outer larger rings one can find satellite vortices around the rings.

These two stars of a binary star system would experience consistence rumbling earthquake oscillating on their surface as a result of strong external torque-induced precession on each other with their epic centers inside the main mass of the stars along the axes of the vortices. (brown dwarf is categorized as a failed star in astronomy.)

The above conjectures on Cat's eye nebula are based on UVS, any comment or constructive input on this is most welcome.

Thanks.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo ...... any comment or constructive input on this is most welcome. Thanks.

Hi Vincent

I do not know how constructive I can be here being the peon of intelligence in this area but in the picture to the right the green spheroid shell is inundated with what appears to be overlay of spokes of incoming to center energy. In saying overlay but possible through the shell itself but I will assume it is to the shell. In this process of vortex creation by the pulsar end of the spoke spiral movement, back push and frame drag to the shell would indicate the origin of the spokes would have been the center of the picture inside the shell but this would demand attention as they do not seem directly connected but to the shell itself.

The brown stars are understood to be never formed fully stars but having very high magnetic fields and the polar axis shown in the center of the image makes the spiral a spiral jet emission but does the origin of the spokes … do they or are they the result of earlier event singular?

The question in my mind is one jet negated by the duality event dance forming in each singularity as they joined as two black holes as the picture on the left indicates beyond the thought of shimmer of mass. Does this lead to postulate dual singularities are singularities of a collapsed BH before they join or is there evidence to show they form after the dance begins? I would subscribe to the thought on the macro: that the vortex by collapse clumping event takes place first. On the BIG side, it may be either way other then the indications of the images as it may be indicative either way on the macro by other rule one platform I am on right now, event, which may or may not be relevant.

The logic is to how now there is the shell,

"said the brown cow…. There goes my poetic brain again, sorry lol." ~ Graham.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by G_burnett The question in my mind is one jet negated by the duality event dance forming in each singularity as they joined as two black holes as the picture on the left indicates beyond the thought of shimmer of mass. Does this lead to postulate dual singularities are singularities of a collapsed BH before they join or is there evidence to show they form after the dance begins? I would subscribe to the thought on the macro: that the vortex by collapse clumping event takes place first. On the BIG side, it may be either way other then the indications of the images as it may be indicative either way on the macro by other rule one platform I am on right now, event, which may or may not be relevant.

Hi Graham;

The asymmetric pair of spiral arms is caused by the binary stars revolving around each other, viscous mass of the revolving spheroids in the spin is pulled by an angular momentum therefore vortically dissipates away from the core by the drag. Although these spiral arms can be categorized as vortex by specification, and is a component of a singular vortex, they are not singular vortices.

See the below image of comet Biela that has displayed a similar type of spiral arm when it got near the Sun, however, this comet was too small relatively to Sun to able to cause a comparable spiral arms on the opposite side of the Sun from this comet. This spiral arm is formed inside the coma of this comet, the coma that encompasses a comet can be as big as one AU (astronomical unit) across.

Originally Posted by G_burnett The logic is to how now there is the shell,

Are you referring to the shell encompassing the Cat's eye nebula?

Thanks.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo .... ....Are you referring to the shell encompassing the Cat's eye nebula? Thanks.

Hi Vincent, thank you, for your reply, i am following most of it there i think.

Yes, the influence on spacial form by the event getting molecular form in the vicinity to move then gather to form the halo would lead me to think the Cats Eye is in motion to minor event but of course the spacial vicinity particle form is being influenced to where the change of direction of form shoots toward the eye in vectored relativity to the direction of radiant output thereby going toward the Eye ... at any given snap shot there would be the drag effect noticed to the vortical event of creating an influence to the creation of the not-true color, green halo ... are the particle form with a reverse spin to particle and such spin going out so far to the spacial energy push resistance then falling back with a the spin of the particle being the energy added to the reverse push?

Lets say you take a ball (particle)and toss it down an alley with a reverse back spin to it so it goes so far and then returns to you .. or you hit a second ball (smashing or dance) and the second gets the spin transposed to come back to you instead of going forward either by size or energy variation .. a trick billiard shot. The haze of halo being the event manifest in proportion near more mass quantified compared to further away event by varied particle form energy escaping through the halo. ..?

I am just trying to picture the halo creation with the spokes shown and the inward vector. I'm not quite there yet.

As an electron moves into stellar dust composite in an interacting event horizon the resulting split(I do not like that word to much) of the molecular or emit would throw off gradient energy back in all direction from the event, a halo, but through the halo the event would possibly be more sporadic in less mass/energy/wave form of same (result green pictured) type making it through and as pictured a true pictorial representation of unpredictability theorem in interaction outside the event?

I hope it is readable, yes the Cats Eye is what i was referring to.

Peace graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by G_burnett The logic is to how now there is the shell

Hi Graham,

Based on hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity, a not perturbed magnetosphere has a spherical shape with viscous mass of cold plasma. Rotation of the suspended spheroid would cause its consolidated viscous mass to become an oblate spheroid, and a cyclonical gravity field effect from its parent suspended spheroid where it revolve on will cause polar vortex pair to form on the magnetosphere and transform it into a torus shape spheroid. A hemisphere surface is within the accretion disc (warped on the hemisphere) of the polar vortex. The shell of the magnetosphere is a pause layer of plasmatic viscous mass that seperates the different layers of plasmatic viscous mass, encompassing the boundary a lower layer plasmatic viscous mass with a diamagnetic effect repelling the two viscous mass layers, therefore consolidates as a shell encasing the boundary of a magnetosphere. This is similar to the pause layers in the gaseous atmospheres of Earth.


Image above is the glow of vortexes in ionosphere as polar aurora, this vortexes is supposedly seperated by its magnetopause layers, causing them to appear as concentric rings from a top view of the polar vortex.

Take a look at magnetosphere by Wikipedia and its related topics, it has stated many important facts in this website, less the vortical analysis where UVS completes it.

Hopefully this has answered your query on how is the shell formed.

Best regards,

p.s. Have to turn on to bigger fonts size, the default size is too small.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo Hi Graham, ..... ......Hopefully this has answered your query on how is the shell formed. Best regards, p.s. Have to turn on to bigger fonts size, the default size is too small.

Hi Vincent
Thank You for your reply

I thought of this comparison to the Earth, I would have to reserve thought of subscription still by something I am not seeing... I do not see the storms, the vortex in the shell but off the shell or am i quantifying the shell too small maybe ... OK I get it. the energy release from the center is being addressed by the external push in at varied uncertainty local to be able to escape in the tears of space but eventually pushed in still or to static to form new form ...

interesting

Thank you again graham