Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 16 of 125 FirstFirst ... 6 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 26 66 116 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 1243
  1. #151
    Grandmaster dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,129
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanked 148x in 102 Posts
    Rep Power
    50

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    Interesting Graham.. the word is here was a reference to the fact that the concept of ether is now rearing its head again

    Quote Originally Posted by G_burnett View Post
    Hi dip

    There is difficulty of comprehension with the word is above, can you be more clearer using the word could? with the word could then I refer back to thought of dark matter then consider proton in transient form then the prevailing push now. ether is in subscription a state of such nature to instantaneous change from the +1 having substance or form to
    -1 and never be ether/void just in the simple the state of transient particle change taking place ... Thus said IMHO to ponder leave the creation of vortex as a residue effect of particle change spin direction mass dependent on platform ... and size of course so yes in some way the picture of the dark energy pushing at a varied rate of change in all direction moving from a center universe event being the medium of compression, no
    the compression of vortex creation is in the dance of the particle(s) and nature of the particle interaction ... the varied nature of of quark speed of movement in the proton shapes the form to interaction qualities or abilities of interaction by other .. now i am not more then a humble singularity with ponder on this to you an sure there is more enlightened able to answer the query .. without a TY once in a while to my posting or comment i am probably looked at as a minor thinker in this area which i am lol peace Graham

  2. #152
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,531
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,755
    Thanked 3,866x in 2,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    Maybe ether is just a low density energy that the higher wound density energy comes from and goes back to if it dissipates or spreads out or sheds.

  3. #153
    Grandmaster G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,684
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,381
    Thanked 1,582x in 1,125 Posts
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    Quote Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com View Post
    Maybe ether is just a low density energy that the higher wound density energy comes from and goes back to if it dissipates or spreads out or sheds.
    Are you giving value to a zero then?

  4. #154
    Grandmaster G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,684
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,381
    Thanked 1,582x in 1,125 Posts
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    anti hydrogen atoms are created and reported in chamber experiments and as anti matter in the chamber move through the chamberr to the side of the chamber where coming in contact with matter .. they distroy each other.

    Are there then free radical quarks ?

  5. #155
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,531
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,755
    Thanked 3,866x in 2,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    I guess the particle smasher ejected things surely live, but for a fraction of a second, then 'disappear' back into ether, the ether being like a zero-point, although still there as more than nothing.

    Same when stars collide or some big thing like that.

  6. #156
    Grandmaster G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,684
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,381
    Thanked 1,582x in 1,125 Posts
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    Quote Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com View Post
    I guess the particle smasher ejected things surely live, but for a fraction of a second, then 'disappear' back into ether, the ether being like a zero-point, although still there as more than nothing.

    Same when stars collide or some big thing like that.
    instantaneous event is a relative time space thing .. the event is infinite to the term zero as it will happen .. not could stop because it has happened ... we take the snapshot but it images as a time event for our perception not the reality as the event continues .. if that makes sense? Peace Graham

    lol i think you will get me on this one eventually ... i am way out there
    Last edited by G_burnett; 06-29-2008 at 06:12 PM. Reason: ps

  7. #157
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,531
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,755
    Thanked 3,866x in 2,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    Could be, as some even propose that All has already happened (Nobody) and that the relative is the news just getting here, time-dilated, at the slow speed of light.

    For now, we can all have all our cakes and pies popping out, and Ether, too, or Edith.

  8. #158
    Grandmaster G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,684
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,381
    Thanked 1,582x in 1,125 Posts
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    The singular vortex event by summitry to the shape of proton form in string, specifically the form compared to peanut shape, twisting in transient linear direction, spread out to lesser wave, with spin, marries string and superstring to Vincent here. in my own head peace graham

  9. #159
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,531
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,755
    Thanked 3,866x in 2,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    The waving twirling stuff has great power built up and I think Vincent and Jimbo are on the right track, as so many other TOE proposals get so complex that the rest of the time is spent inventing more complexities of particles and messengers of force, and so on.

    (The peanut is better for health than a tasty donut.)

  10. #160
    Grandmaster G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of G_burnett has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,684
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    2,381
    Thanked 1,582x in 1,125 Posts
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: The Universal Vortical Singularity

    Quote Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com View Post
    The waving twirling stuff has great power built up and I think Vincent and Jimbo are on the right track, as so many other TOE proposals get so complex that the rest of the time is spent inventing more complexities of particles and messengers of force, and so on.

    (The peanut is better for health than a tasty donut.)
    the shape of the dohnuttt counts


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top