[dipayankar]

Hi Vincent, The alignment has happened. However it seems that the sun is at its minimum activity level in tems of sun spots. Aalso can you please help me locate any paper on the internet where there is a proof of ether (plasma) observed.

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo I believe Graham was merely painting a worst case scenario like he had stated in his initiating sentence. The direct effect on Sun by gravitation forces of aligning planets is minuscules, in fact not noticeable at all in offsetting gravity of the Sun. However, based on singular vortex mechanism, the torque-induced precession on Sun by focused gravities of aligned planets would have significant effect on viscous mass of the Sun. The wobbling effect on Sun as a result of the torque-induced precession effect can be enormously amplified on photosphere in a torque-free precession that would spawn sunspots to form in cluster. The approximately 22 year solar cycle with sunspot activity reaching its peak twice is apparently accounted directly by planetary alignment of Jupiter and Saturn twice during a precession cycle of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Hi Vincent, The alignment has happened. However it seems that the sun is at its minimum activity level in tems of sun spots. Aalso can you please help me locate any paper on the internet where there is a proof of ether (plasma) observed.

hi here is some interesting thoughts after few lonely nights reading for you maybe, let me know what you think of this. ~unified regards g


www.aias.us publications, UFT PAPERS paper number 1 through 115 and or total subject matter of platform ...

[G_burnett]

this just looked so neat had to share it ...

[G_burnett]

Graham has ponder to the effect of a transient energy form in directional spin from the sun impacting upon the polar energy emit from the planet Uranus having a near facing emit to the sun in same transient fluid form in spin, a wave of energy, and condense thereof that may take place by resonant event horizon.
Sage hearing postulate states, “the polar qualification to ponder is not specified and may if changed vary the prediction and findings in the event horizon.”
Graham revises ponder, “Prediction of event horizon will be independent of polar field qualification as designated Magnetic North or South. Further added by Graham, thus said, “... will be within the either or parameters of facing the oncoming described wave and having change effect as the polar qualification is in event East or West by seasonal positioning of celestial body in relationship to the solar system orbit of Uranus around Sol.”
Sage consents to the Key words, “facing” and “parameters of facing” being in effect to the prediction, as postulated to leave out the degree of facing other then are existing to vary prediction out of containment.
Graham continues to predict by submittal of insert drawing titled “Smf-1” below thumbnail with reiterative description, “the vector of energy in transient motion by pictorial shows two yellow rays indicative to represent sol emit in spin and direction a field in 1D.”
Catching his breath Graham continues, “… this is over laid to emit of Uranus spin transient energy from polar direction shown in blue spin in axis declination, black vector vertical.”
Observant Sage interrupts’ with the query, “ the vertical vector has two directional indicators to the black ray horizontal vector indicative then of field direction vertical to meet either or above qualification of North or South direction facing, but where is the event horizon predicted a dedicated point of event scalier if each wave form is of different intensity?”
Graham quickly directs Sage to access information on absolute resonant event to state, “where the horizon of interaction will vary to increase scapular motion on the vertices quantification, but as head on event being noted not perpendicular, the wave form will be resonant at point X an event independent of the vertical quantification scapular and pictorially predicable vortices’ created change in emit parameters.”
Sage prompts the query, “define emit parameters before and after event and are they noticeable effect?”
Graham revisits known data of Uranus to postulate the undefined paradox of low energy emit to mass an excepted fact by Einstein E=mc2 formula the reference creating a paradoxical unexplained state with Uranus emit in emit is lesser then predictable for the mass of Uranus, “ …the emit is a celestial magnetic field form of curvature around the celestial body that as the black vector vertical is expanded on horizontal plane dimension, to include the whole of the surround field of emit, the effect direct on is one of resonant condensing of energy form.”
Sage replies puzzlement then enlightenment, “studious indeed must be the taking of the simplest path as being the best to reach conclusion counter to speculation of record by other that the MF energy field is created just by less dense matter of air.”

Then graham in revisiting the pictorial and composite photo images’ by NASA adds. “… the black polar area of the body noted in space exploration photography of varied type, and by curvature around the body in vertical curvature degrees of condensation being the event, and the created fact of Uranus having a small equatorial belt of higher heat, and the belts from the pole to the equator indicative of wave form outside of a singularity a single peaked wave crest but of multiple crest of wave noted in varied longitude and latitude by sine effect of the wave in varied belt there can be a conclusion the event is taking place as postulated.


Sage continues the statement of conclusion with, “Energy condensation to lower emit would conclude the peripheral to never before explained lack of predictable energy in emit from Uranus but in keeping with the postulation energy can not be created or destroyed where then is this energy being stored so condensed and not released if you please Graham explain as this is not in the parameter of the hypothesises given here?”

Graham opening up his laptop adds, “the energy of none emit in nature is transferred by conductivity to the opposite facing of the orbital body condensed state uniform to seasonal changes.”

Sage replies, “Will you submit further data specifically to the event in relationship to East and West facing wave interaction, if necessary?”

Graham replies, “in picking up a banner to enter the realm of ponder I for one believe the journey to enlightenment should be a shared one for both solving limited means and time availability and to such would only do further steps in this direction with others that rally in team for understanding what is not and await enlistment terms by this flag in the wind.”

[G_burnett]

to the above Re Uranus

[dipayankar]

Graham,

Did you click this photo? It is amazing...

Originally Posted by G_burnett this just looked so neat had to share it ...

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Graham, Did you click this photo? It is amazing...

No dip. wish i did and be out there but NASA released the pic, note moons shown as well. They had a fly by a short time ago, now near Pluto orbit and going beyond with two active Sat's, I think the newest findings is that our aether is not a solar system circular but is indented by push in effect of energy coming from beyond our system ... for those reading my above post and referring to the thumbnail insert below it picture the thumbnail turned sideways as in the photo in fact I will post other in here ...Graham

[dipayankar]

Whats what Vincent says. He also says that ether is made of thin plasma. Where can we coroborate this statement?

Originally Posted by G_burnett No dip. wish i did and be out there but NASA released the pic, note moons shown as well. They had a fly by a short time ago, now near Pluto orbit and going beyond with two active Sat's, I think the newest findings is that our aether is not a solar system circular but is indented by push in effect of energy coming from beyond our system ... for those reading my above post and referring to the thumbnail insert below it picture the thumbnail turned sideways as in the photo in fact I will post other in here ...Graham

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by dipayankar Whats what Vincent says. He also says that ether is made of thin plasma. Where can we coroborate this statement?

This is burning plasma form, not so thin or thin depending your point of view. enjoy! Graham

oh oh epithamy of Sage ... doesn't it look familiar? brain matter ??? interactions?

[G_burnett]

Universal Standard of Spin Pictorial

(For adoption.)

By Graham Burnett

Part one

I postulate that there is varied type of spin worth visiting to effect in varied event by stationary state and motion transient from one space to another. The first visit will be to stationary form of mass and state of spin standard of pictorial representation.

We can all from grade school have a picture of the earth spinning on an axis line giving a curved vector of direction either spinning right or left by the determination of up or down of the axis turning one way or the other. There is little in standard given to research of representation standard of spin being pictured and thus I believe the world is ready for the standard to clarity and unity of research in all disciplines.

Thus postulated above as a starting point introduction visits the vertical axis designated as stated below to assign with the reverse symbol of “y” denote being used to determine an axis in spin. This gives to an equatorial plane or horizontal plane vector ray designation “x” that will cross the vertical axis as a diameter of the form spin.

The axis vertical depicted is in a line vertical which has thickness given to it is a point infinite small or large to the form in spin but finite to the group or singularity of form as with no form there is no spin. It should be noted here that this should not be confused as form having mass or no mass.







(Picture insert here)

The curved line used here is representative of the axis having spin compared to a line of no spin effect. As the "s" line pictured can be over lay to the axis as function of the axis rotation direction or the line will underlay the axis as there is only the two states of either above or below the horizontal plane spin right or spin left and for representation behind the axis as underlay it will be then a right hand spin and if it will be a left hand spin and overlay of the axis. As the spin is a function of the axis, the axis will be noted in a wider font line then the thinner secondary spin representation presented.

The forms given as rectangular in blue, square in yellow and red in spherical are not limited to variation in size and will be discussed further below and not limited to being with form finite.

{Feed back on this as it is developed is welcome.}