Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo Hi Dipayan, sorry to have let you worried, there were some issues that need my attention and also need some quiet moment to ponder alone.
Plasmas vary according to temperature and density, and have characteristics that scale over many orders of magnitude.
The cold plasma you are talking about is Plasmas utilized in "plasma technology" in our ambient, not astrophysical plasmas.
See also a Plasma (physics) site by Wikipedia to see the wide variation of plasma. Go to the bottom section and check out under Space Plasma for details.
All celestial objects are plasmatic in nature, this is hard cold fact. Rock solid Earth in primodial form is protoplanet condensed from plasma.
NASA astronomers now know as fact that intergalactic space and large voids are not vacuum. They simply deny to accept that the substance dectected is plasma, they cannot agree that the gravity lensing method used that have dectected the substance based on GR is flawed. If the technique if flawed, then their discovery is bogus, this amount to nothing was found either way, hence the status quo. A catch 22 situation. |
hi Vincent, hi dip
cold plasma fusion is a concept that by chemical dis-bonding of atomic molecular state there should be a release of neutron for use of as a heat source. This would have to take place by changing one type of atom into another, not so much as to change a molecule of atoms.
is it possible? yes, i would submit that it would be but not practical. The events of the US research into this matter of cold fusion began with a fellow who said he did it and then was taken in under the control of the US Government. He then said to all the future failures of them trying to duplicate what he said would work that they just did not do what he had said they should do. It is quite the story that for many many decades he was paid abhorrent sums of money to do this cold fusion and never did.
One has to wonder that the fellow either was the most ethical man known combined with the most silver of tongues and did not want to give it to the military as they ran rough over him or that indeed he did not do it or the US was a big cluster phuck in following what he wanted to do.
Which scenario you want to believe is a personal choice and till it is done I have no interest in the Chemical ENG end of pondering of this. That was my dads forte.
The missing dark matter is said to be found now in space. It was hard to find because it absorbed all and emit nothing.
What does this? the rational thought has to be that the matter is of such composition that it is everything and does not reflect what it does not have composition of to absorb. Every frequency is absorbed by this missing matter and nothing is reflected to be quantified or qualified by the view.
The only way it was found was by the curvature of light it caused when particle protons were in transient fluid form and bent around it.
One can by such postulation predict that this missing matter is in fact "aligned condensed matter" by the very fact of location together instead of random placement throughout the universe more then it is.
Is it the black hole of all black holes? No, not the view I would take. Reason being it is cold. Black holes are in motion, dark matter is not in the same league ..(note I do not say it is not in motion) absolute rest is always >0.
Alignment demands this >0 absolute rest feature of the term to be applied.
So in the alignment of the dark matter there is yet then no more then a clumping with out the fusion ... and get this, fusion needs the rise in temperature that will not happen until the dark matter clumps even more in alignment getting spin .... then ... watch out ... it loses its condense. BANG
ignition. Will it be a total wipe out of this universe? maybe ... how much mass/matter is there in the event to the mass/matter it will effect?? ... see the relationship demand? This is relativity.
Is this the only place where there is dark matter? no ... in different densities it is all through the aether and the universe changing from >0 absolute rest in varied form and in different plasma fusion event. ... this is "potential" ponder.
I am just in my own head here from some of the links i have been going to and others thought here. When does the fusion happen? it is predictable as a pulse non continual event, which I might add seem to be the problem with fusion reactors ... and they are leaning to run one now on pulse theorem in preference.
ponder all this in forum goes with out saying willingness to hear reply for unity and debate ... the vortical effect, random fusion taking place ... everywhere ... it is a big concept. ... but this is where I am at right now in dark matter ponder and plasma.
You may note a paradoxial view that i have postulated the heat needed in the plasma fusion event ... this is a relativity postulation to the direction of acoustical resonance usage of the inverse square law and personal vector rule tools involving spin and particle interaction ... work in progress sort of stuff when I am not sleeping on my keyboard. IMHO ~ kind regards, graham