The Universal Vortical Singularity

[G_burnett]

This does indicate a vortex. However do you think it is due to the superimposition of the two waves?

Hard to say. The constant high frequency spinning wave gets faster my thought and the other gets slower in the give and take .. one condenses and one does the opposite ... can you see the difference?

The waves are not effecting the waves but are effecting the particle mass in motion that changes velocity of spin and direction of mass ... reflecting effect not to forget absorb effect .. its a paradox of where you happen to stand at the perception .. what came first the chicken or the egg .. we can argue that lol but I would rather look at the wave frequency being higher in the green and in the precession advance takes over the other by imposing force by getting in that position first to do so and with more frequency of effect on the other then what it could do to the other. With inverse square law applied shifting the particle further away there is the accumulative vortex effect perceivable as the imposing more frequent wave of force on the move particle lessens in relativity with distance ..( ... but not so necessarily the only cause of lessening)??
TY for the q, kind regards graham

[jag]

"molecular clouds are susceptible to gravitational collapse, because gas pressure alone cannot counteract the gravitational force a cloud exerts on itself. The stability of a gas cloud against gravitational collapse is given by the "Jean's length." If the Jean's length of a cloud is smaller than the scale of a cloud, the gravitational force is stronger than the gas pressure, and the cloud shrinks." THE ASTROPHYSICS SPECTATOR: THE GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE OF......

The vertex of the collapsing portion of the vortex is on the grid. The rising contours of the swirl have no demension of collapse, PHI, Golden section (G's pictorial). In the next example the vertex (Event Horizon), represented by the squiggly lines, becomes more powerful in the green as a result of the collision of the opposing swirl.

I think the two vortexes are attracted toward each other before the mass collision takes place because of the opposit spin. What would happen if the spins were in the same direction

jag

[G_burnett]

"molecular clouds are susceptible to gravitational collapse, because gas pressure alone cannot counteract the gravitational force a cloud exerts on itself. The stability of a gas cloud against gravitational collapse is given by the "Jean's length." If the Jean's length of a cloud is smaller than the scale of a cloud, the gravitational force is stronger than the gas pressure, and the cloud shrinks." THE ASTROPHYSICS SPECTATOR: THE GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE OF......

The vertex of the collapsing portion of the vortex is on the grid. The rising contours of the swirl have no dimension of collapse, PHI, Golden section (G's pictorial). In the next example the vertex (Event Horizon), represented by the squiggly lines, becomes more powerful in the green as a result of the collision of the opposing swirl.

I think the two vortexes are attracted toward each other before the mass collision takes place because of the opposite spin. What would happen if the spins were in the same direction

jag

Hi jag

I think in the query we can predict a capacitor potential increase or Uranus paradox solved or in terms of Vincent here and inward vortex effect increase of energy being taken in until discharge ... proof of helix formation excess tail of Uranus. .. this is simplified with key words capacitor and helix discharge but I like the way you are going on this please continue and I could mention to look at such prior post with equal frequency of wave in both particles effect or linear drift created and pulse discharge behind. ... of energy potential to do work. ... plasma energy by density creation and primary density of aether for the example. ? You heard it hear first lol IMHO ~ regards graham

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent

It took a few hours but I think I have a little gift for you to download and enjoy;

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/?buildid=1009770

Once you download then you can down load the player with controls on every search find of interest .. they will ask do you want to use at your place or view from there so when you have the player saved click down load and then you can have some fun!

Young fellow from over your way is involved to for reference to specific needs.

Graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Jag,

Run through your posts in this forum and wow you are twenty-five years into vortex research! Warmest welcome to the vortex world of UVS! Appreciate very much on your supporting vote for UVS.

You was looking for me? And thanks for finding me.

At quantum level the existence of vortex has already been scientifically proven in BEC, and lately there was a breakthrough with light interacting with quantum vortex in a BEC experiment.

'Tornadoes' Are Transferred From Light To Sodium Atoms

Looking forward to hear from you on your insightful findings for vortex and experiences.

Cheers!

Thank you so much Vincent, it took me a while to find you.

You are right-on with your "Universal Vortical Singularity" the only thing left is to prove that the same thing happens on the quantum level. I hope the LHC will shed some light on this. Tiny vortexes of gravitons are what form and hold subatomic particles together (the super string). The fact that we observe multiple atomic forces does not mean that they do not originate from one source. The basic force is gravity.

I'm afraid that the LHC experiment is based on a mistaken theory, the Big Bang, and will not reveal the god particle. My feeling is that the creation of subatomic particles by the formation of gravity vortexes, happens when the energies of the universe are so slowed down that they acquire the requisite degree of motion, then, under favorable conditions, these same energies become mass.

Best Regards
jag

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Graham,

This is indeed a very interesting animation.

Before I was trying to use epitrochoid and hypertochoid to picture such differential vortical events of varying angular velocities, but this induced drift animation you posted can simply illustrate better.



Particularly it is for analyzing Ice Age events that has displayed cyclical positive and negative buffs in shorter periods and periodically Earth spiked into Ice Ages that have non-linear periods. Galactic center of Milky Way and Sun is in differential rotation interacting at different angular velocities similar to the induced drift animation but in oppoiste phase; i.e. Galactic center is rotating in cw direction with enormous angular momentum and Sun is rotating in ccw with relatively weak angular momentum.

The link for citation use of this picture did not work for me, please provide the URL.

Thanks.

hi again Vincent

here is one animation of interest IMHO, click on picture for link for citation use here.

This is an induced drift animation ... one wave with higher frequency taking over ...
non uniform potential .. i do not like the pigtail creation as it indicates constant in the takeover and this may be be in error or just two small to see the vortice event ..?

Enjoy G

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Graham,

Thanks for this gift, and I like the variable patterns that show how vortices in a cluster interacte that changes according to controllable parameters.

His interactive graphics also has a simple mathematical model that simulates BEC waveform, will play with that later. Wonderful, and lots of other interactive model to explore.

Thanks.

Hi Vincent

It took a few hours but I think I have a little gift for you to download and enjoy;

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/?buildid=1009770

Once you download then you can down load the player with controls on every search find of interest .. they will ask do you want to use at your place or view from there so when you have the player saved click down load and then you can have some fun!

Young fellow from over your way is involved to for reference to specific needs.

Graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

If they are attracted toward each other and spin in the same direction the two vortices will merge and become a larger dual-core vortex rotating around their barycenter.

I think the two vortexes are attracted toward each other before the mass collision takes place because of the opposit spin. What would happen if the spins were in the same direction

jag

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham,

This is indeed a very interesting animation.

Before I was trying to use epitrochoid and hypertochoid to picture such differential vortical events of varying angular velocities, but this induced drift animation you posted can simply illustrate better.



Particularly it is for analyzing Ice Age events that has displayed cyclical positive and negative buffs in shorter periods and periodically Earth spiked into Ice Ages that have non-linear periods. Galactic center of Milky Way and Sun is in differential rotation interacting at different angular velocities similar to the induced drift animation but in oppoiste phase; i.e. Galactic center is rotating in cw direction with enormous angular momentum and Sun is rotating in ccw with relatively weak angular momentum.

The link for citation use of this picture did not work for me, please provide the URL.

Thanks.

Hi vincent

The URL on this one was the one I lost on a power surge reboot here and have been trying to find it, the NY School of animation search has not shown much results and can not narrow it down how I got to it. They had all the others done up like this as too in progressive animation with open formulas to vary and interaction controls. I know I know, I am kicking myself still. Still looking though. G.

Glad you like the other. be back on later .

[G_burnett]

Jag, all, .. to the induced drift where there would be reverse of one spin I have been with the ponder in conclusion now that wee could predict the lensing effect or halo find in Einsteins theorems.

If the constant speed of light or frequency is decided on then the second equal frequency has to be with less energy or there would be no escape. So the moving light proton in transient energy form with spin unable to move the more massive particle in spin would tend then to shift around the mass.

Measurements of the amount of lensing will quantify the mass effect. ...basically describing both the mass in effect. IMHO G.