[dipayankar]

Graham, the matter does look to be embedded in dark matter. I wonder if the spin of the matter and the dark matter are in opposite directions. This would certainly create a vortex.

Originally Posted by G_burnett

I think you can call this plasma effect ..

compliments of Chandra and NASA

NASA/CXC/MIT/UMass Amherst/M.D.Stage et al.

Isnt that just so cool ... shivers up my spine lol. enjoy kind regards Graham.

[PoPpAScience]

Hi Vincent;

I came across this post in another site and thought you might be interested in it. What do you think of it?





Walter Russell: (From A new concept of the Universe)
How Gravitation and Radiation born each other:

Nature works in strange ways. Of all her mystifying processes, her manner of producing the double polarity, which assures two-way balance for the two-way journey of her two conditions is perhaps the most elusive of her illusions. It is well to clarify this mystery step by step at this point.
(a) The carbon wheel spins true upon a horizontal shaft which arose vertically from its plane of equilibrium.
(b) The rim of the wheel begins to spin on the horizontal plane of equilibrium and arises to become the vertical equator of its hub.
(c) The vertical has become horizontal and the horizontal has become vertical to transform one unchanging rest condition to two changing conditions of motion.
(d) The positive electric worker has made the rim of the wheel become its hub by use of its centripetal force. That is how Nature manufactures GRAVITY and multiplies potential to contract waves (motion of seeming “mass”) into solids surrounded by space.
(e) The negative electric worker has made the hub of the wheel become its rim by use of its centrifugal force. That is how Nature manufactures RADIATION and divides potential to expand waves into space centered by solids.
(f) The rim of the wheel is now 90 degrees from the equilibrium plane of its birth, and is 90 degrees from the shaft of its hub. From a plane of no motion. It has become a sphere of maximum motion.
(g) The hub shaft of the wheel is now parallel with the plane of rest and 90 degrees from the plane of maximum motion.
(h) The rim of the wheel was maximum speed and the hub was minimum when motion began on the plane of rest, but now the hub is maximum speed and the rim is minimum when the wheel stands up from rest.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by dipayankar

Graham, the matter does look to be embedded in dark matter. I wonder if the spin of the matter and the dark matter are in opposite directions. This would certainly create a vortex.

Hi Dip TY for the reply, There is so much going on in that system there is only one thing one can do in a ponder, ... take your best guess, if not in the now, it will happen later.

Vincent I looked over that site and the geo shapes ... the three quark do indeed imply a triangular shape the thickness of the quark but the model fails to be butsomuchmore unquote Einstein.

Quark shaping of the proton for example has been in an accepted finding dependent on the velocity of the quarks in the FS extra missing mass .. such fluid a form compressed by the wave action of the electron in empathy resonant state ... the shape in varied formation can be any to the geometrical rules ... and I would venture to say vortical cone of dimension but not to outside that dimension of quantification,... the vortex extend forward with a time axial and back ... and composite higher up. .. we are all connected to those rules in the dimension of thought or platform... basing the postulation on singularity of point zero.

Then as we get into two point zero we have ... drift.

the neo and hex reference is supportive to ponders at present to two areas and clarity of thought ... ahh no, three areas lol. Ty sage for reminding me of Uranus. .. If we take the point (x) and point (z) as the bottom of an equilateral triangle plane in Euclidean 3d pictorial and rotate the side half the distance of the side we have a point of the second triangulated or point one of three of the second triangle unified the lines will form a hex on Cartesian plane in the spin of the (x).

In further rotation we have six k cusp. ... the three point wave in consideration of frame drag may be a gradient two point wave or rule one effect manifesting for me and I am working on the ponder in a revisit of the initial external wave effect .. the resonant factor of a scaled three wave crest or is it just a paradox of viewing parameters in dimensional space .?best guesses excepted ... the easiest path leads to ... etc I am sure it is a reverse effect of a three cusp effect or three to one beat wave resonant effect manifesting. Goes right to the three quark composite movement .. but in my own head yet a ponder.

Is it a musical one two beat or one two three or one two one three one two one three ... a frequency of six beat pulse? It may be a greater scaled resonant effect this push in but its way up there in the bother of numbers ... 980 or something my rough guess but I wont go there quite yet to my thoughts on special numbers getting out of the nano space.

the dimensions of spin through varied density applied have me wanting an attic or visit to my lake today, will be back later.

Kind regards graham.





I will let you know later.

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent never made it to the lake but a chilly day of outside coffee and an smoke after working had me thinking in the Uranus ponder. (I know, god help us all, I was thinking again lol).

For the rule one to be effective on Uranus, the pole facing laid down effect with the commonality of qualification which pole is north being the one behind not the facing then we have particle streams in transient form in opposite direction and perpendicular effect to the equatorial plane add of energy manifesting as heat emit where one would expect the condense with the facing of the pole laid down.

The condense or potential as a capacitor is taking place by sole emit in a push in effect to the south pole. This is a facing pole view in this part of the postulation dimension where the particles are in MF alignment and in spin giving the heated pole or clear of ice dark area noted. Thus with a vortex effect in spin of heated particles it is downwards in direction.

As the effect will not wrap past any given equatorial plane past the plane it is there that the condense stops to predominant face on effect. The heat is predominate past the equatorial plane again to the helix emit as a predominant tail in tornado pictorial recorded by the wrap of field with no particle in the atmosphere being effected head on now except in the most upper density and … on the ring to pull off and add to the tail by perpendicular vortices effect predominant as just further condensed in alignment factors in an added spin drift to the tail. In revisit to the space lab experiment where the ball of water seemed to welcome the ring… the ring would welcome the ball … varied view perspective.

This is hard to picture at first in the paradox of view when the seasonal orbital change takes the planet into a state where the rotation is facing the sol as would be the edge of the ring. This adds to the tail in consideration of the right hand rule and spin and condenses the density of the planet by the added to spin vortex push creation in the right hand rule where predictable then is more quanta of aligned particle form in the atmosphere and the core density not a factor to effect in the all effect.

In geometry Euclidian it would be akin to the (z) point and (x) point changing “roles” but still vortex effect with the (y) point the constant axial. Still a condense event or cooling of the core by alignment add to the point other qualified in seasonal transient form.

The advance and reverse pulse effect of two forms in resonant frequency and spin would show from a push in effect from the back but going upstream to the MF alignment less flux being reported and certainly not the pronounced helix formed resonant to the sol tail. I believe the missing is E as in E=mc2 and not the flux. The flux helix being effect of conjunction of wave form in spin resonant Sol : Uranus.

I further note a more elongated oval shape of this gas giant or pushed in facing the sol plane seasonally adjustable a predict and more evidence that the push in effect is greatly added to by the sol emit effect of MF to the particles in upper low density a dimension of effect predictable.

The key remember in this postulated will be the empathic resonant effect of conjunctive spin by the “right hand rule,” unlike Saturn, and similar to Jupiter, but for the facing laid down features of Uranus. Storm eyes akin to Jupiter have been noted on Uranus in belted cloud formations in support of the right hand rule being dominant factor.

This too is supportive to vortex creation using the right hand rule to varied event being a pushed in effect of forces but I am still off the gravity platform being Sol is very far away compared to the million times greater MF effect on the clumping to condense density of the upper atmosphere.

I would be better at the forum podium in this then writing the paper still in the works to contain most of the above as I am trying to make it understandable from many platforms of interest I am sure will review the ponder.

Argument and query welcome to my limited vocabulary as I ponder further.

Kind regards all ~ Graham

[jag]

Hi Vincent,

Oppositely spinning vortexes will attract each other. This attraction will begin when the halos of these votexes first contact each other. The space between particles at the edges of the halos will allow a merging and drawing together of the vortexes. As they move closer and the density and intensity of the particles becomes greater, one will eventually be destroyed and it's mass will be assimilated into the other or, one will flip 180 degrees which will, in refrence to the other, reverse it's spin and they will join each other at their event horizons and a sperical vortex will be born.

jag

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Jag,

You are correct with your explanation, this happens when the undulating driving force of the two differential vortices is intensified. Bernoulli's principle can account for the force dynamics of drawing the two vortices together.



When the vortex nearer to the core form as a spoke (UVS terminology) in the event horizon, the other vortex will flip 180 degrees like you have described, it transform as a spiral arm, and cups with the spoke as a spherical vortex, is a lobe structure of void. As a whole in a reference frame, they will rotate cyclonically. This phenomenon of lobe structure in void or lower density viscous matter can be found in Ant Nebula, also occurs in deep-ocean whirlpool.



However, under stabilized circumstance when the the undulating driving force of the two differential vortices is steady, the force interactions of two vortices in differential rotation will repel each other with their centrifugal forces, but held steady by the undulating driving force; this scenario is similar for electron vortices repelling each other. When the undulating driving force dissipates, these two differential vortices will repel and move away from each other.

Vincent.

Originally Posted by jag

Hi Vincent,

Oppositely spinning vortexes will attract each other. This attraction will begin when the halos of these votexes first contact each other. The space between particles at the edges of the halos will allow a merging and drawing together of the vortexes. As they move closer and the density and intensity of the particles becomes greater, one will eventually be destroyed and it's mass will be assimilated into the other or, one will flip 180 degrees which will, in refrence to the other, reverse it's spin and they will join each other at their event horizons and a sperical vortex will be born.

jag

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Allen,

Thanks for this Walter Russell methapors, this is a very good analogy to describe the fundamental of gravity and radiation. Recently I am studying into Walter Russell work on "The Universal One", he was an advocate for electromagnetic vortex, and his peroidic table of elements based on geometry is also very intriguing.

A vortex buddy who studied Aether Physics Model mentioned that Walter Russell work is fundamentally similar to UVS.

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience

Hi Vincent;

I came across this post in another site and thought you might be interested in it. What do you think of it?

Walter Russell: (From A new concept of the Universe)
How Gravitation and Radiation born each other:

Nature works in strange ways. Of all her mystifying processes, her manner of producing the double polarity, which assures two-way balance for the two-way journey of her two conditions is perhaps the most elusive of her illusions. It is well to clarify this mystery step by step at this point.
(a) The carbon wheel spins true upon a horizontal shaft which arose vertically from its plane of equilibrium.
(b) The rim of the wheel begins to spin on the horizontal plane of equilibrium and arises to become the vertical equator of its hub.
(c) The vertical has become horizontal and the horizontal has become vertical to transform one unchanging rest condition to two changing conditions of motion.
(d) The positive electric worker has made the rim of the wheel become its hub by use of its centripetal force. That is how Nature manufactures GRAVITY and multiplies potential to contract waves (motion of seeming “mass”) into solids surrounded by space.
(e) The negative electric worker has made the hub of the wheel become its rim by use of its centrifugal force. That is how Nature manufactures RADIATION and divides potential to expand waves into space centered by solids.
(f) The rim of the wheel is now 90 degrees from the equilibrium plane of its birth, and is 90 degrees from the shaft of its hub. From a plane of no motion. It has become a sphere of maximum motion.
(g) The hub shaft of the wheel is now parallel with the plane of rest and 90 degrees from the plane of maximum motion.
(h) The rim of the wheel was maximum speed and the hub was minimum when motion began on the plane of rest, but now the hub is maximum speed and the rim is minimum when the wheel stands up from rest.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Allen,

Managed to make a qualitative prediction in the subatomic world, inspired by a physicist today who told me about the anomaly on probability locations of electrons that interact instantaneously.

- The enigma of electrons at opposite ends of their nucleus can interact instantaneously with each other beyond speed of light can be explained by their connectedness with their undulating atomic vortex.

Any comment?

Please also let me know on what you think on unclear2nuclear.

Any input is appreciated.

[G_burnett]

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/Seasons/

here is good one my friend vincent and all.

lay down the axial control and start ... Uranus seasonal change. ... note how the equatorial belt will stay yellow in the animation ...? great start point for me. Kind regards ~ G

[PoPpAScience]

Hi Vincent my Vortex buddy. Just a quick post to say thanks for the links, and to say sorry I do not have time to read them right now. They look very interesting though, and look forward to looking at them in the future.

I have so many thoughts running through my head about our Vortex Universe and look forward to future exchanges with you. Right now I'm on the road driving over 1,000 km a day, and will be for at least another month.

I spend my spare time looking over your site and I just love it. Latter, Vincent.