The Universal Vortical Singularity

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

hi vincent

found a story here today that links my ion fill theroem to Saturn in pulse effect and Uranus as a more straight on effect ..

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27525165/

enjoy, kind regards Graham

Hi Graham,

This is a good report on evidence that space within solar system is filled with plasma.

Here is another one, acoustic sound wave of Jupiter was detected about 23 million kilometres, sound requires a medium to propagates.

Cassini spacecraft detection of ion-acoustic waves, and Sounds of Jupiter by NASA that reports on detection of sound waves in interplanetary space, these are scientific evidence that interplanetary space has discernible oscillations is therefore not vacuum.

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham .... Cassini Spacecraft has taken some further pics (I think)

CLICK

It may help

cool bananas ... greg

ty yep, got that one an posted it some where on here lol , using it in my blog.
G

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham,

This is a good report on evidence that space within solar system is filled with plasma.

Here is another one, acoustic sound wave of Jupiter was detected about 23 million kilometres, sound requires a medium to propagates.

Cassini spacecraft detection of ion-acoustic waves, and Sounds of Jupiter by NASA that reports on detection of sound waves in interplanetary space, these are scientific evidence that interplanetary space has discernible oscillations is therefore not vacuum.

ohh cool, ... knew I was not imagining the pulse and beat .. why would we have wiskers? ty vincent for the link. g.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

I am reading your links and have a quick question .... are you saying that vortex formations on individual planets (haven't read this whole thread) are formed by the alignment and gravitational pull of all the planets and moons including the Sun ??


cool bananas ... greg

Quick replies to you queries:

Vortex formations on individual planets are formed by solar system alignment and gravitational push of all the planets and moons including the Sun.

And by inference the whole Universe may be affected in this way ??

Absolutely! Its is the synergetic of torque-induced precession and torque-free precession.

[G_burnett]

looks like Robert has changes and added a few more goodies again on the site.. TY ROBERT!
kind regards g.

[Graybeard]

Vortex formations on individual planets are formed by solar system alignment and gravitational push of all the planets and moons including the Sun.

In that case ... I have a complicated question for you (and graham) which I have been unable to answer for some time ... and no luck on the internet either.

Will take me an hour or so to formulate ... it is late here 23:00 ... and I am due to go off shift ... will post my question here tomorrow

cool bananas ... greg

[G_burnett]

I think I know what your question is already ... ergo I will look back to the difference between volts and amps lol... graham

[dipayankar]

I guess this theory would also suggest that the Universe started in the form of a vortex from singularity rather than an explosion. However we need to find out what caused that vortex to form at all...

Dipayan, everything in the universe is connected. In connectedness anything affects everything regardless of how subtle the effects are even in such a manner that they could not be felt. The discrete forms in isolation we all perceive and taken as granted on a localized platform is a cognitive paradox.

For example, it is self-evidence that emotions can be infectious in a connectedness, through empathy we could mysteriously relaize the emotional effects. However, in a connectedness perception there is no mystery on how empathy works.



View gravity as quantas of longitudinal wave; i.e. vortex. This is fundamentally the product of a very stable source of energy consolidated in a volumetric pressure. Every line in the above image is a quantized plasmatic tornado that in isotrophy is formed through aether vortical motion.

See an external link on their recent empirical research in detecting magnetic flux waves (aka gravitational waves) using a Magnetic Scalar Wave detector. The experiments evidently demonstrated with consistence result on how gravity waves interact in a sea of energy with lightning activities.

[G_burnett]

I guess this theory would also suggest that the Universe started in the form of a vortex from singularity rather than an explosion. However we need to find out what caused that vortex to form at all...

Hi Dip

I think this is a good question and look forward to Vincents and others reply but the vortex is a phenomenon of inversion of the torus confinement in my mind rather then an explosion picture ... giving the event it due of mass ... an explosion pictorial due to the relative to us speed of the event expand ... still the wrong picture getting rid of the dimension of measurement of time where it becomes deceivingly the explosion view of event ... it is still going on to varied degree this event and as I would dare to postulate effect of reversal taking place at the same varied space time of wave effect.

This I am sure does not make some disciplines very happy to hear but nature of wave and spin vortex demands the ponder.

Kind regards g.

My post in string Dip was indeed not with much study knowledge of string theory as I left it after the reading of the open or closed nature allowed the string as being it is too non committal in that simple to the event of open an closing potential state for me. I will read some more on it and maybe get back to a further ponder posting in the future time permitting.

g

[Graybeard]

I think I know what your question is already ... ergo I will look back to the difference between volts and amps lol... graham

No .... its not about that. Its about a Black Hole.

A Black Hole must be the ultimate vortex. Its believed that at the centre of every galaxy is a black hole spinning. This explains the vortex shape of the galaxy. If we look at the Black Hole from Realtivity rather than QM, then, according to the WIKI

Two concepts introduced by Albert Einstein are needed to explain the phenomenon. The first is that time and space are not two independent concepts, but are interrelated forming a single continuum, spacetime. This continuum has some special properties. An object is not free to move around spacetime at will; it must always move forward in time and cannot change its position in space faster than the speed of light. This is the main result of the theory of special relativity.

The second concept is the base of general relativity; mass deforms the structure of this spacetime. The effect of a mass on spacetime can informally be described as tilting the direction of time towards the mass. As a result, objects tend to move towards masses. This is experienced as gravity. This tilting effect becomes more pronounced as the distance to the mass becomes smaller. At some point close to the mass, the tilting becomes so strong that all the possible paths an object can take lead towards the mass. This implies that any object that crosses this point can no longer get further away from the mass, not even using powered flight. This point is called the event horizon.

The important point here is that once you have crossed the Event Horizon ..... then ALL paths lead to the centre. As the escape velocity required to cross back over the event horizon is greater than the speed of light.

OK ... thats fine ... I understand that, at least have a concept of it. But, now they say, that when 2 galaxies collide the 2 central Black Holes merge into one. That is, two swirling vortex's both having only a one-way street spiralling inwards now merge. How ??

Does the bigger one swallow the littler one ? In which case how does the little one allow matter back out across its event horizon, in order for it to be swallowed ? Remember, all possible paths lead into the centre, no other way. Now we have two centres whose event horizons are going to overlap, a bit like a Venn diagram. How does the smaller black hole 'give up' its event horizon ?? Matter will be torn from the centre of the smaller to feed the bigger, and in doing so will have to break the rule that nothing can cross an event horizon unless it is driven and can exceed the speed of light ??

Or do all black holes have the same unique centre, a singularity that is indistinguishable. No matter which event horizon you cross, you are now on a path to a single common centre. From the WIKI

According to the "No Hair" theorem a black hole has only three independent physical properties: mass, charge and angular momentum. Any two black holes that share the same values for these properties are indistinguishable. This contrasts with other astrophysical objects such as stars, which have very many—possibly infinitely many—parameters. Consequently, a great deal of information is lost when a star collapses to form a black hole. Since in most physical theories information is preserved (in some sense), this loss of information in black holes is puzzling. Physicists refer to this as the black hole information paradox

If 2 black holes, or even all black holes, are indistinguishable, could it be that whatever 'singularity' exists in the centre is common to them all. The same place. ??

I don't get it, and can't find any answers on the net on how black holes merge. How does the Universal Vortical Singularity explain this information paradox

cool bananas .... tough one eh ?? greg