The Universal Vortical Singularity

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

I guess this theory would also suggest that the Universe started in the form of a vortex from singularity rather than an explosion. However we need to find out what caused that vortex to form at all...

We can only hypothesize based on Universal Vortical Singularity on what have caused that vortex to form at all. Below are the excerpts from "Logic and belief systems", I suggest you explore this web page in more details for elucidation to your inquiry:

Based on Universal Vortical Singularity, in nature the natural vortical mechanism in a vortical paradigm that governs physical universe to function in a physical framework as oneness is a synergetic of functioning non-material constituents (physical nothingness that has functions) and functional material constituents ((physical structures that deliver the functions) that are involved with natural logical conjunctions as well as natural logical negations in synergy. In a grossly simplified manner, the functions of non-material constituents in nature (defined in the terms of scalar potential, fictitious forces {aka inertial force}, force fields, wave, etc) are likened to the software systems of an electronic device, and the functions of material constituents (defined in the terms of various types of entity and matter) are likened to the hardware systems as in digital electronic circuits driven by electric potential (aka voltage; electrical tension. An electrical power source discharges electricity as electrical force in a closed electrical circuit through electrostatic pressure from the built-up electrical power source.) that has potential gradient in a closed system network of the electronic device. The electrical potential must pre-exist its non-material and material realizations of the electronic device, the synergetic of material logical functions with non-material digital logics organized in the functional hardwares of a digital system that integrate in the electronic device comes later.

In nature such non-material constituents and material constituents in synergy are integrated to function in a universal vortical system in unison as oneness within a potential energy system with potential density that materializes the effects to function physically through non-material functions. However, it begs for further inquires on the existence of potential density in universe that has evidently occurred. Based on the model of Universal Vortical Singularity and incorporating with a plasma cosmology hypothesis, the origin of this potential density can be systematically accounted for in a vortical paradigm model. This is the synergetic of tensegrity caused by aether vortical motion that naturally creates physical plasmatic structures in physical space that have boundaries, in isotropy of the natural plasmatic structure encased within a boundary that are consolidated in volumetric pressure it renders the effect of potential density.

Through a further paradigm shift to a higher order based on the single model of Universal Vortical Singularity, it could offer a hypothesis on how the existing aether could come about into being as it is. With the synergetic of a boundless universe intelligence (hypothetical, non-material) in the higher order that initiate primary vortical motion in a vastly static potential in universe (the effect of an entity that is supposedly created by the boundless universe intelligence), this synergy would vortically create an entity of aether with dynamics that has a primary vortical momentum, then with a synergetic in optimally balanced functions of vortical dilation (expansion) and vortical implosion (contraction), the aether in a plasmatic form would be vortically consolidated within a vast boundary encompassing the physical universe. The physical universe is inherited with this primary vortical function through the primary vortical momentum and therefore form as a clockwork universe that sets everything in unisonal perpetual motion, as a perfect machine with its gears governed by the laws of physics. This is an extrapolation based on the vortical model of Universal Vortical Singularity on how this primary vortical potential in the universe comes about into being as it is, and with vortical perpetual motion it begets everything in a vortical paradigm.

In balanced synergetics that are vortically created from a physical nothingness,
everything through a oneness in the physical universe evolves in a vortical paradigm.

[G_burnett]

In that case ... I have a complicated question for you (and graham) which I have been unable to answer for some time ... and no luck on the internet either.

Will take me an hour or so to formulate ... it is late here 23:00 ... and I am due to go off shift ... will post my question here tomorrow

cool bananas ... greg

Hi Greg

Very interesting post of query and put very well.

I have to ask first what your idea of a black hole is in terms of shape and assume from your posts you must lean toward the torus form.

The difference between a push in and a pull in description of gravity phenomenon is the way you perceive the cause. It is from density variations of created vacuum … now is the material entering the vacuum pulled in or is it pushed in?

Right. It has to be a push in effect from something not pulled in from nothing. As the clumping takes place there is a loss postulated of diameter of the shape. (non inclusive cause of loss effect/event)

Is that enough yet? … no, sage tells me it is too big a leap.

As the loss is accounted for with the whole of the universe behind the event in spinals vortex motion … note jet stream(s) … containment forces that are there in the torus shape can no longer hold the containment.

And bingo … it goes to cats eye nebula effect emit. Vortex views the pictorial. Inversion and not a big bang except to time dimensions put to it.

What breaks in the containment potential? Linear or orbital? … take your pick as both have the opposite mid point of observe when in the inversion event but not at the end of event or the begin.

And then there is the multiple torus join … plate galaxy the example in mind. I gave that to Vincent prior in geometric vectoring pictorial to the evidently support of NASA shots.

I am in the simple still, do not take offense for it is not to say more terminology is not out there or you could not understand it sir but for other reason. I am very cold and wet having done a good scout deed tonight where a mother an kid got hit by a car coming from a annual Baptist Church live Bethlehem scene on Dogwood ... well no one else was doing any thing in the shock of it all so I did and will reread your post later and maybe answer some more when I have finished dumping here, after all it is the season.

Kind regards graham.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Dipayan, did not provide the hyperlink for "Logic and belief system" so here it is. Give it a go to explore this web page and I believe you can comprehend it, and looking forward to see the web counter jump that indicates that at least someone from your country have accessed it.

[PoPpAScience]

Hi Vicent; One of those rare times were in the forum at the same time.

I would like to say thanks again for waking me up to the fact that there is an "Action", that can be called 'fictitious force'. The Vortex is the proof of this. This "Action" exists in many forms, and is the great something that is nothing.

I always pictured this "Action" in my mind, but could not put it to words. Your web site gave me so many pictures to put to words about the great 'fictitious forces' that give us Evolution.

I know in our first conversations you seen these forces as the consequence of interactions between matter. I see it as "Action" waiting to be utilized by interactions between substance. I see the Vortex as the "Action" that gave "Boundary" to the boundless, and "Motion" to the motionless.

I'll add that you have really expressed your view what I have said above in a very profound way below to Dip. Its so beautiful.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Vicent; One of those rare times were in the forum at the same time.

I would like to say thanks again for waking me up to the fact that there is an "Action", that can be called 'fictitious force'. The Vortex is the proof of this. This "Action" exists in many forms, and is the great something that is nothing.

I always pictured this "Action" in my mind, but could not put it to words. Your web site gave me so many pictures to put to words about the great 'fictitious forces' that give us Evolution.

I know in our first conversations you seen these forces as the consequence of interactions between matter. I see it as "Action" waiting to be utilized by interactions between substance. I see the Vortex as the "Action" that gave "Boundary" to the boundless, and "Motion" to the motionless.

I'll add that you have really expressed your view what I have said above in a very profound way below to Dip. Its so beautiful.

Cheers!

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

hi Vincent

I knew it was going to be an "or what" reply and indeed moot reasoning noticed. Almost like the view is there but just denied in mind set ... or job needed.

I have a question for you. At what point of collect of substance do we see the weak force first manifest between the force and the clumping ... the first quanta measurement of dimensional effect.

The connecting points around a concentric vortex ring before the event horizon in the accretion disk. The weak force is manifested in the vortical spiral arms of the vortex that connects to the vortical spokes in the event horizon.

then the question has to be effect through the electron shell upon the surface of the clump up the line to the shape and massive density of object denied expand.

As each shape getting bigger in mass there is less chance for expand to the set inward ... why becomes the question ... now we can quanta measure based on shape the loss of ability to expand, a reverse of the string increase of D as two globes are formed and the D1 + D2 does not equal the original D1. D1 and D2 clumped (that is a word very distasteful for lack of other used)the decrease in Diameter holds the event out wards expectable from taking place and proof of force into a constant non constant but still constant effect to varied set.

Not to ignore the other forces that may or may not be effect at the time but thus ... to marry gravity to them?

My thought here tonight Enjoy! kind regards g.

Upper limit is the answer; the vortical culminated momentum has an upper limit in a state of equilibrium within the medium in a consolidation process.

[G_burnett]

Good, I agree, upper limit and further no arguements on medium is more then a medium I am sure.

Do we have votex within a vortex when we look at the arms? I see it in two point [+++...) set singularity of effect and the twist to vortex event,....further eg the containment tube to varied slinky effect by the collect bond of mass still not ... lets say aligned? We can not say the bright spots in the magnetic containment of the solar emit are condensed but the less white mass in the event may be more condensed, the jelly acting like jelly before and after the condense and all in vortex contain of emit.

whew ... I am way out there tonight ... again ty for your reply

kind regards g.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

No .... its not about that. Its about a Black Hole.

A Black Hole must be the ultimate vortex. Its believed that at the centre of every galaxy is a black hole spinning. This explains the vortex shape of the galaxy. If we look at the Black Hole from Realtivity rather than QM, then, according to the WIKI

Your above assumption is correct. Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, a galaxy is driven by a galactic votex, similar to a hurricane with vortically consolidated clouds is vortically driven by an atmospheric clear air vortex.

The important point here is that once you have crossed the Event Horizon ..... then ALL paths lead to the centre. As the escape velocity required to cross back over the event horizon is greater than the speed of light.

OK ... thats fine ... I understand that, at least have a concept of it. But, now they say, that when 2 galaxies collide the 2 central Black Holes merge into one. That is, two swirling vortex's both having only a one-way street spiralling inwards now merge. How ??

Does the bigger one swallow the littler one ? In which case how does the little one allow matter back out across its event horizon, in order for it to be swallowed ? Remember, all possible paths lead into the centre, no other way. Now we have two centres whose event horizons are going to overlap, a bit like a Venn diagram. How does the smaller black hole 'give up' its event horizon ?? Matter will be torn from the centre of the smaller to feed the bigger, and in doing so will have to break the rule that nothing can cross an event horizon unless it is driven and can exceed the speed of light ??

Or do all black holes have the same unique centre, a singularity that is indistinguishable. No matter which event horizon you cross, you are now on a path to a single common centre. From the WIKI

All black holes that can be merged on a same platform within a larger accretion disc have a same unique center, nevertheless the singularity is distinguishable by solving the cognitive paradox. These black holes (vortex columns of galactic vortices) are apparently separated on a higher surface but are actually merged towards a common center as a multiple-core vortex. An intensified multiple-core galactic vortex would cause the separated vortex columns on the surface to merge in a magnetic reconnection process.

UVS has solved this information paradox. It might be a small step away, however, like how Graham described it, this small step is a big leap away. It requires one to reconsider the gravity effect, that it is a push event instead of a pull event. This gravitation push effect is elaborated and explained in the section under "The atomic structure of an atom."

If 2 black holes, or even all black holes, are indistinguishable, could it be that whatever 'singularity' exists in the centre is common to them all. The same place. ??

I don't get it, and can't find any answers on the net on how black holes merge. How does the Universal Vortical Singularity explain this information paradox

cool bananas .... tough one eh ?? greg

The term "indistinguishable" is a moot reasoning, assumed in the circumstances of the information paradox that was not understood, therefore is indistinguishable in its fallacy.

Universal Vortical Singularity has taken the information paradox of black hole to task, explained that this is categorically a cognitive paradox, solved the mysteries, clarified the anomalies and has provided scientific evidence that are immutable. It's gonna be quite a heavy read that requires revisits on several fundamental issues taken to task. I would strongly suggest you to also explore a topic on "Universal Vortical Singularity enlightenment on black hole, dark matter and dark energy", and explore as thoroughly as you could for "The paradoxical effect of Universal Vortical Singularity".

Thanks for you interest in UVS.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Good, I agree, upper limit and further no arguements on medium is more then a medium I am sure.

Do we have vortex within a vortex when we look at the arms? I see it in two point [+++...) set singularity of effect and the twist to vortex event,....

Do we have vortex within a vortex? Absolutely!



The vortical spiral arm itself is a dragged unisonal vortex, the image of Whirlpool galaxy above show a satellite galaxy (with millions of nested vortices, each of these nested vortices give birth to a whirling star with planets and their in a womb of gas with plasmatic stellar material.) driven by an extended vortex arm, within the vortex arm itself, stars and their planets with moons are vortically weaved along the vortex arm by its harmonic vortices that are driven by the vortex arm.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

I don't get it, and can't find any answers on the net on how black holes merge. How does the Universal Vortical Singularity explain this information paradox

cool bananas .... tough one eh ?? greg

Hi Greg,

What we perceive a natural phenomenon as it is may not always be what it is, an example is the perception of rising Sun from below the horizon is a scientifically understood relative motion illusion that the effect is caused by a rotating Earth; an understood cognitive paradox. However, a majority of people even in the world today are more often unwarily dwelling in delusion of this direct perception on a localized perspective that the Sun rises, in a casual manner are always not able to register this known cognitive paradox in slips of their descriptions on rising Sun until being reminded.

"You can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created."

- Albert Einstein

The study for paradoxical effect of Universal Vortical Singularity is focused on solving natural cognitive paradoxes that have rendered as mysterious natural phenomena observed in universe, through identifying the cognitive paradox and understand the mechanism of natural negations involved that have caused the complexly inversed illusions. Heuristically, this would elevate the perception to a transcended level to know how a cognitive paradox is counterintuitive and therefore can mislead the observer in an observation of a natural phenomenon, such as the cognitive paradox of a rising Sun phenomenon, and simply understands on why is the direct observation a cognitive fallacy.

The above are excerpts from "Paradoxical effect of Universal Vortical Singularity"

It would become tough in figuring the way out of the wood when trapped in circular paths that are misled in a localized reference frame on ground level. However, on an elevated view, there might be a way out of the wood in a simple step that cuts out of the circular paths.

Best to you.