The Universal Vortical Singularity

[G_burnett]

Hi Greg,

What we perceive a natural phenomenon as it is may not always be what it is, an example is the perception of rising Sun from below the horizon is a scientifically understood relative motion illusion that the effect is caused by a rotating Earth; an understood cognitive paradox. However, a majority of people even in the world today are more often unwarily dwelling in delusion of this direct perception on a localized perspective that the Sun rises, in a casual manner are always not able to register this known cognitive paradox in slips of their descriptions on rising Sun until being reminded.

The study for paradoxical effect of Universal Vortical Singularity is focused on solving natural cognitive paradoxes that have rendered as mysterious natural phenomena observed in universe, through identifying the cognitive paradox and understand the mechanism of natural negations involved that have caused the complexly inversed illusions. This would heuristically elevate the perception to a transcended level to know how a cognitive paradox is counterintuitive and therefore can mislead the observer in an observation of a natural phenomenon such as a rising Sun and simply understand why is the direct observation a cognitive fallacy.

"You can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created."

- Albert Einstein



The above are excerpts from "Paradoxical effect of Universal Vortical Singularity"

It would become tough in figuring the way out of the wood when trapped in circular paths that are misled in a localized reference frame on ground level. However, on an elevated view, there might be a simple way out of the wood in a step that cuts out of the circular paths.

Best to you.

He Greg and Vincent ...all

Your question ponder may warrent a revisit to the hourglass nebula but there may not be a case of two black holes joining ... they are not full equal state in the ones we think we see and there we will have to consder the over ride of the lesser spin and disperse of the mass and out on an arm or limb here the state of dark matter the ponder created.

(Someone should say it lol) kind regards graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

He Greg and Vincent ...all

Your question ponder may warrent a revisit to the hourglass nebula but there may not be a case of two black holes joining ... they are not full equal state in the ones we think we see and there we will have to consder the over ride of the lesser spin and disperse of the mass and out on an arm or limb here the state of dark matter the ponder created.

(Someone should say it lol) kind regards graham

Hi Graham,

You have reminded me on the vortices of Jupiter. The Great Red Spot is a known atmospheric storm (i.e. driven by vortex) that were observed to have merged with smaller storms in past observations. These merged satellite vortices are on a southern equatorial cloud band and is driven by an easterly jet stream, all the vortices around the southern equatorial cloud band have a common polar core.



Explore the above web page that elaborates in details for the observed vortices phenomena on Jupiter and open the large animation for vortices of Jupiter on full screen to have a good look at the gaseous Jupiter that it is fully filled with vortices in its atmospheres.

Thanks.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Greg and Graham,

Spokes

Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, the southern equatorial cloud band of Jupiter is a widely opened up polar vortex of a high altitude atmospheric layer. The satellite vortices around the cloud band are the vortical spokes of the polar vortex in a crossed-section view.

Schematic image of unisonal vortex

The vortical spokes within a vortex ring in the above schematic image of unisonal vortex can illustrate the satellite vortices around a cloud band of Jupiter, all these satellite vortices share a common core of the polar vortex. Its vortical spiral arms formed on a higher atmosphere is not visible, they are flattened in the polar vortex of a higher atmospheric layers as planetary rings of Jupiter as shown below, the spiral arms are not shown up in this optical image.

Planetary rings of Jupiter

[G_burnett]

Interesting post above Vincent. Got me off one ponder an on to the next, have to quit visiting so much here lol.

The first thing that strikes me (excuse the pun) is the ring of vortex should be expanded to the ring(s) around the planet not just the atmospheric composite perspex as these gas giants have a clear extend to what we are calling the lower density of composite "space" yet on the rings of Saturn for example there are notable fusion event residue in spoke pictorial taken by Cassini, lightening to planet from ionized rings. ... but just the ponder IMHO , kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent

Forgot to ask ... How did you make out on reading FET ... not the social control stuff going on I was teasing about a bit but the other?

Every thing I am reading these days goes back to spin state effect in event and Mr Einstein's non agreement with the spookiness effect being the way to go ... CERN findings later if as predicable leaning me the other way of ponder ... maybe. I wonder if the break from others define of the questions raised to define the questions in his own writing led to the rule of law ponders ... I sort of like the spookiness event.

Hard to decide for me based on personal events that are explained by it but still with something missing...


Why did the world take so long to understand spin component .... OOOOKKKKAY ... hmmm glad I came back to this paragraph. ...sage made me focus on aether matter reminding me who I was posting to.

(At leaste in the shut down it has given me more time to review old math again lol) I told fredrick he is ready for spintronics now that he got into Protons and Electron state in Idea Thread.

Kind regards g.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Vincent

Forgot to ask ... How did you make out on reading FET ... not the social control stuff going on I was teasing about a bit but the other?

Every thing I am reading these days goes back to spin state effect in event and Mr Einstein's non agreement with the spookiness effect being the way to go ... CERN findings later if as predicable leaning me the other way of ponder ... maybe. I wonder if the break from others define of the questions raised to define the questions in his own writing led to the rule of law ponders ... I sort of like the spookiness event.

Hard to decide for me based on personal events that are explained by it but still with something missing...

Hi Graham,

FET to me was an interesting read. It postulates that energy is physically real substance, elaborates element creations in the particle physics direction by relating how photons create neutrons that clumps as all physical objects. It has an interesting section on whirlpool universe where he briefs on several types of two-dimensional whirlpools nested in six magnitudes.

Why did the world take so long to understand spin component .... OOOOKKKKAY ... hmmm glad I came back to this paragraph. ...sage made me focus on aether matter reminding me who I was posting to.

IMHO, currently, the world's dominant thinking that has been led by realists/objectivists have taken it for granted on what is reality in a paradoxical universe that is counterintuitive.

As an illustration, what we all could comprehend now without a slightest doubt in general acceptance by majority of people that Earth is a spheroid, for millenniums the world in general misled by its cognitive paradoxes took very long to understand that the consensus for the flat world fact is fundamentally wrong; the fact is false.

"False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long;" - Charles Darwin

I have added a few sections in Paradoxical effect of UVS, the insertions are focused on intellectual enlightenment to resolve cognitve paradoxes. I believe it is worth a revisiting.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi all,

Solved a cognitive paradox today and would like to share it to invite any input, suggestion or opinion.


The Laplace resonance exhibited by three of the Galilean moons. The ratios in the figure are of orbital periods.

A comparative analysis for the Great Red Spot of Jupiter

The stability of the Great Red Spot could be primarily caused by differential resonance with three Jupiter's moon in Laplace resonance. However, it would require empirical evidence to ascertain if these moons in orbital resonance are the cause. Nevertheless, the largely combined precession effect in a differential manner would have contributed to the stability of this storm. See a section in the Antarctica Ozone Hole that elaborates on differential resonance of a polar vortex with Earth's moon. This differential resonance phenomenon involves very complex cognitive paradoxes.

The Great Red Spot suspended on the atmosphere of Jupiter could be in differential resonance with these moons in orbital resonance; they are synchronized in a differential rotation. Evidently, through comparative analysis that Earth-moon precession effect can affect an atmospheric vortex on Earth, it infers that gravity perturbation by motion of orbiting moons around Jupiter could render the precession effect for the the Great Red Spot to be an exceptionally stable storm. See a topic on solar system alignment effect.

Universal Vortical Singularity predicts that the stability for the Great Red Spot is as a result of synchronization in a differential resonance with its moons.

See the full version in a section under Vortices of Jupiter.

Thanks.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

more on the Great Red Spot.....



Moons of Jupiter that are more massive and nearer to Jupiter would have greater precession effects that would affect the stability of a vortex in Jupiter than those moons that are less massive and further away. Ganymede, Europa and Io are three of the Galilean moons that are the largest and the most massive of the many moons of Jupiter, these three moons are the nearest moons to Jupiter among the four Galilean moons. The furthest Galilean moon is Callisto, although this moon can have significant precession effect on Jupiter, it is almost twice as far away from the next nearer moon to Jupiter and it is just more than one third the combined mass of the three nearer Galilean moons that are in orbital resonance. The other four moons nearer to Jupiter are tiny dwarf in size and mass when compared to these three Galilean moons that are in Laplace resonance, would not have much gravitational influence in comparison. The rest of those further away moons are also dwarf by comparison, as a result of lesser gravitational influence to Jupiter according to the inverse-square law of gravity, these much smaller moons that are further away would therefore have the least significant precession effect on Jupiter.

The qualitative prediction is updated as:
Universal Vortical Singularity predicts that the stability for the Great Red Spot of Jupiter is primarily caused by a differential resonance with the three Galilean moons that are in a Laplace resonance.

[dipayankar]

If we can quantify gravity as waves, then the vortex motion could kick in... for that we need a possitive result from the gravity waves experiment..

Dipayan, everything in the universe is connected. In connectedness anything affects everything regardless of how subtle the effects are even in such a manner that they could not be felt. The discrete forms in isolation we all perceive and taken as granted on a localized platform is a cognitive paradox.

For example, it is self-evidence that emotions can be infectious in a connectedness, through empathy we could mysteriously relaize the emotional effects. However, in a connectedness perception there is no mystery on how empathy works.



View gravity as quantas of longitudinal wave; i.e. vortex. This is fundamentally the product of a very stable source of energy consolidated in a volumetric pressure. Every line in the above image is a quantized plasmatic tornado that in isotrophy is formed through aether vortical motion.

See an external link on their recent empirical research in detecting magnetic flux waves (aka gravitational waves) using a Magnetic Scalar Wave detector. The experiments evidently demonstrated with consistence result on how gravity waves interact in a sea of energy with lightning activities.

[PoPpAScience]

Vincent, Vincent, Vincent!! If I was a student in your class, it would take me a day to work on each paragraph of your web site. I would spend most of my day googleing your technical words to get a clear understanding of their meanings. You are so versed in technical jargon that you overwhelm me. But I love it.

I tell the wife all the time that you are the most promising "New Age" technical thinker I have read so far. As long as you allow yourself to always reevaluate your thinking, I see no end to the level of insights you can achieve.

"UVS" is the future of science. I believe this with all my heart. Even though it will be so hard to break through the minds of the "Restrictive thinking ones".

I personally think that dleviwing's theory and Jimbo's theory combined, will eventually be superseded by your "UVS" theory. I believe there is no physical that is not "Vortical".

All that is left, is for you to complete your journey to the beginning of this Universe. I hope I can help in this journey.

I posted this in both are threads.
__________________