The Universal Vortical Singularity

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent and all

Gravity perception accepting paradox exist demands query to clear view of degree of condense event.

In the loss of diameter by condense the shape of substance in expand would increase the quanta of substance in the universe against the mass of the universe in exist.

....this would lead to the ponder of substance state maintaining itself as a mass of effect after event. Effect lessening every relative quanta of dimensional condense event. This lessening creates a state of potential for event.

Motion of substance, current, fusion ... regional under protectorate relative eg Sol ... and distance determinate to parameters of ... time relative to the mass effect able behind the event in potential not yet effected.

"Where do we go with this ponder sage?"

"I am working on the confinement factor of the electron relative to a nucleus graham, tricky view down here .."

"Hmm .. if the solid crust of the earth is the containment in condense of the core then maybe we have a correlation to the nucleus sage?"

"Yes, but i have been a little deeper to the quanta measure with the quark motion of the proton spin right now."

"Is it the quark bond that keeps the containment or the shell?"

"One might postulate the bond is more to the parameters of exist then containment issue graham."

"I still am not happy with the body of lesser mass effecting the surround but it is just having done so once in the loss of diameter it has created a state outside the norm of the universe that in its nature is compensating for... sage?"

"sage?... "

"sage are you there....?


.....damn, gone again, ....have to remind him to cover those black holes one day....

kind regards g.

[jag]

[QUOTE=Graybeard;75301]

A Black Hole must be the ultimate vortex. Its believed that at the centre of every galaxy is a black hole spinning. This explains the vortex shape of the galaxy. If we look at the Black Hole from Realtivity rather than QM, [QUOTE]

The ultimate vortex is the black hole spinning at the center of the ultimate galaxy. On the QM I expect it would be the vortex spinning at the center of an atom or a quark.

jag

[G_burnett]

We have had our first snowfall today that lasted more then an hour. Hope all are doing well.

There are many vortex effect. Are they caused by event? Or does the vortex cause the event?

the expand potential of aether having density to expand into from condense of matter that once was aether releases the potential at hand ... to further condense.

Note I would not be bold enough to say fusion is the potential release of aether and hold that back for reasons I am not sure present understanding is logical conclusion as fusion being the expand.

the event tends to be a circle of effect. ... the more condense the more the core heats and then no crust ... forces expanding then out of containment, not so much maybe pushing the universe but to enrich the near.

How they do this depends on the containment parameters in play. When they do this, again depends on the containment parameters in play ... and of course how they were formed these parameters tells us the type of containment of either or the two form predominant known to the effect failing of containment to nova.

the jets are the emit to emptiness of the source.


Matter in transient form of motion out from the emptiness of the black hole. Perpendicular change of direction due to the reel ... vortex point zero.

IMHO kind regards g.

[dipayankar]

In my opinion, event causes the vortex, primarily because vortex is a reaction to certain forces within that event. Lets begin with the Big Bang for instance. The Big Bang would have translated into a vortex, however the Bang was caused due to some reason which had nothing to do with the vortex formation

We have had our first snowfall today that lasted more then an hour. Hope all are doing well.

There are many vortex effect. Are they caused by event? Or does the vortex cause the event?

the expand potential of aether having density to expand into from condense of matter that once was aether releases the potential at hand ... to further condense.

Note I would not be bold enough to say fusion is the potential release of aether and hold that back for reasons I am not sure present understanding is logical conclusion as fusion being the expand.

the event tends to be a circle of effect. ... the more condense the more the core heats and then no crust ... forces expanding then out of containment, not so much maybe pushing the universe but to enrich the near.

How they do this depends on the containment parameters in play. When they do this, again depends on the containment parameters in play ... and of course how they were formed these parameters tells us the type of containment of either or the two form predominant known to the effect failing of containment to nova.

the jets are the emit to emptiness of the source.


Matter in transient form of motion out from the emptiness of the black hole. Perpendicular change of direction due to the reel ... vortex point zero.

IMHO kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

In my opinion, event causes the vortex, primarily because vortex is a reaction to certain forces within that event. Lets begin with the Big Bang for instance. The Big Bang would have translated into a vortex, however the Bang was caused due to some reason which had nothing to do with the vortex formation

Right on Dip, the event causes the vortex or as said the event causes the effect of a vortex.

The big bang is event created by? we can see in the vortex condense of matter in wards that a clumping takes place of such high density. the matter condensed is under containment but still emits jets of matter in transient form.

In looking at the effect a vortex has to spin of the core event on that linear plane something fails in the containment and we have an event where the core inverts or comes outward in parameter residue control still. In this manifests the show that there is vortex phenomena but the parameters do not let go, just the matter. ... then the parameters of containment seem to let go by the dispersal in a collapse ...the condenser loss of charge. IMHO rolling off my brain this morning. Kind regards G,

[dipayankar]

Lets look at the volcano. Though volcano does not show a vortex effect (or does it?) the crust tries to contain the magma till some fissure or weak point starts to leak the magma to the surface. Hence in my mind every containment would have a weak point and the energy built up inside would create a vortex which would then 'force' the jets to spiral outwards.

Right on Dip, the event causes the vortex or as said the event causes the effect of a vortex.

The big bang is event created by? we can see in the vortex condense of matter in wards that a clumping takes place of such high density. the matter condensed is under containment but still emits jets of matter in transient form.

In looking at the effect a vortex has to spin of the core event on that linear plane something fails in the containment and we have an event where the core inverts or comes outward in parameter residue control still. In this manifests the show that there is vortex phenomena but the parameters do not let go, just the matter. ... then the parameters of containment seem to let go by the dispersal in a collapse ...the condenser loss of charge. IMHO rolling off my brain this morning. Kind regards G,

[G_burnett]

hmm volcanoes .. the magma in heat event wants to expand through the crust containment made containment by condense or cooling in fracture form.

the ability of the magma to rise due to heat expand of substance is through the inability of the crust to contain because the crust has fractures that when the push decreases on one side of the magma it can seep further up and in doing raising the form to eruption state.

I believe it is Venus that has been pondered on that whole continents would become part of the meld to then harden again by the lack of craters seen and having the only explanation of such event more often then not.

If we look further into the aether as a wave pulse event effect then the situation of planets and sun to earth and the moon, create a state of protectorate from the full wave effect of push in effect similar to the finding of the solar system not to be a true circle ... it has bulges caused by factors of containment in the containment... density is one.

What is the shape of a black hole containment? a bagel? ... When it reaches a certain state of exist ... ok a inversion on local time.

The vortical movement of matter into the center for more dense concentration of matter is due to the "lack allowance" in the whole event by the emit of jet. the jet the result of the vortex effect containment of the jet in direction ability from the center.

the jet is a jet by its vortex containment and control. .. then we get into the helix form of control of the jet, two factors of spin. two axial effect. .. hmm moved off earth here, sorry, i drift like that sometimes.

I think the volcano effect is more in line with my rule one of two transient particles coming to perpendicular

The problem with this is that one must consider the conjoining forces to include the heat expand therein moving the event horizon +1 state on the Y axial, not up and down but one way depending on your perspective view, up through the crust.

this is all just off the top of my head Dip and I will look into your analogy a bit further.

Kind regards graham

[dipayankar]

Good you found the analogy useful. It was only for containment. However on the voretx front, I am yet to get a connection between the formation of vortices and the forces inside a volcano..

hmm volcanoes .. the magma in heat event wants to expand through the crust containment made containment by condense or cooling in fracture form.

the ability of the magma to rise due to heat expand of substance is through the inability of the crust to contain because the crust has fractures that when the push decreases on one side of the magma it can seep further up and in doing raising the form to eruption state.

I believe it is Venus that has been pondered on that whole continents would become part of the meld to then harden again by the lack of craters seen and having the only explanation of such event more often then not.

If we look further into the aether as a wave pulse event effect then the situation of planets and sun to earth and the moon, create a state of protectorate from the full wave effect of push in effect similar to the finding of the solar system not to be a true circle ... it has bulges caused by factors of containment in the containment... density is one.

What is the shape of a black hole containment? a bagel? ... When it reaches a certain state of exist ... ok a inversion on local time.

The vortical movement of matter into the center for more dense concentration of matter is due to the "lack allowance" in the whole event by the emit of jet. the jet the result of the vortex effect containment of the jet in direction ability from the center.

the jet is a jet by its vortex containment and control. .. then we get into the helix form of control of the jet, two factors of spin. two axial effect. .. hmm moved off earth here, sorry, i drift like that sometimes.

I think the volcano effect is more in line with my rule one of two transient particles coming to perpendicular

The problem with this is that one must consider the conjoining forces to include the heat expand therein moving the event horizon +1 state on the Y axial, not up and down but one way depending on your perspective view, up through the crust.

this is all just off the top of my head Dip and I will look into your analogy a bit further.

Kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

Good you found the analogy useful. It was only for containment. However on the vortex front, I am yet to get a connection between the formation of vortices's and the forces inside a volcano..

TY Dip for the reply

Pondering further has led me the lack of empathic response possible by me to your first query and the lack of empathy is a real eye opener for me to probability of mind set.

IMHO the finding these more recent years of science and acceptance of heated fluid state of transient particle having mass and being matter is still not an acceptable application of quanta dimensional measure.

Nor is the concept of push in effect. The repeat here is that when condense takes place of the orbs to one orb there is a lack of diameter of the created orb from the two orbs having there own diameter.

Please correct me if such a surmise is wrong being based on the new creation from one orb of another where the two new diameters are more then the original.

... orb shape further the less effect of slower quark and not full the infinite shapes that might be created by varied speed of quark. Thank you dave pointing me there ..

The road leads to insanity with out rules with infinite shape possible but eventually, eventually repeated, the join of orb will create a ... oh i hate this word vacuum and i prefer "lack" in the environment that was or state of what was outside containment and to varied ends ... even to black hole paradox. .. ok thats way out there maybe.

Such said I go back to my rule one.

Will think of this some more with sage and redo a picture of my rule for volcano with him ... he says it is kind of hot in there ... Kind regards G,

[dipayankar]

Okay great, now just pushing it forward, when the diameter of one orb changes (I presume it shrinks) then does it create a vacuum? Or does some kind of metter fill in?

TY Dip for the reply

Pondering further has led me the lack of empathic response possible by me to your first query and the lack of empathy is a real eye opener for me to probability of mind set.

IMHO the finding these more recent years of science and acceptance of heated fluid state of transient particle having mass and being matter is still not an acceptable application of quanta dimensional measure.

Nor is the concept of push in effect. The repeat here is that when condense takes place of the orbs to one orb there is a lack of diameter of the created orb from the two orbs having there own diameter.

Please correct me if such a surmise is wrong being based on the new creation from one orb of another where the two new diameters are more then the original.

... orb shape further the less effect of slower quark and not full the infinite shapes that might be created by varied speed of quark. Thank you dave pointing me there ..

The road leads to insanity with out rules with infinite shape possible but eventually, eventually repeated, the join of orb will create a ... oh i hate this word vacuum and i prefer "lack" in the environment that was or state of what was outside containment and to varied ends ... even to black hole paradox. .. ok thats way out there maybe.

Such said I go back to my rule one.

Will think of this some more with sage and redo a picture of my rule for volcano with him ... he says it is kind of hot in there ... Kind regards G,