The Universal Vortical Singularity

[G_burnett]

Okay great, now just pushing it forward, when the diameter of one orb changes (I presume it shrinks) then does it create a vacuum? Or does some kind of matter fill in?

Ty for the reply Dipayankar.. If we use the analogy of two bubbles joining to be one, in our PSI atmosphere and by thus join create notable effect? see the problem?

Its a QM nightmare.

Is there a change of the PSI and where is "it" coming from in the expand? ahh it is already there .. only the potential of push in is effected or degree of potential. .. more mass in the picture of potential and smaller diameter the result from the more mass potential? I know it is what ? Going where ... ? the measure is unfathomable to me at the moment but the event is not and this is not to say the effect is singular to the increase in mass push in effect and the bubble itself in the new state has spinier event in the nature of condense ... for example not conclusive to total in the join to lets say varied state or composite of the two or color variations prior to join.

With out new rules there is no box but with the box there is not new rules. I do not know if I can give your the full answer your require.

The new orb Diameter newly created by the join of two orbs having degree of diameter measured each, is not equal the sum of the two orbs diameter, it is a lesser D then the sum of the two diameters that created the new orb.

And then the orb rises until there is less push in effect and bursts... it seems so simple .. we can not dare to presume.

IMHO kind regards g.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Vincent, Vincent, Vincent!! If I was a student in your class, it would take me a day to work on each paragraph of your web site. I would spend most of my day googleing your technical words to get a clear understanding of their meanings. You are so versed in technical jargon that you overwhelm me. But I love it.

You have already understood the fundamental in essence, these technical jargons are just detail work for relating to relevant issues. Glad you have enjoyed it.

I tell the wife all the time that you are the most promising "New Age" technical thinker I have read so far. As long as you allow yourself to always reevaluate your thinking, I see no end to the level of insights you can achieve.

Send my regards to your wife. And tell her I have also found a buddy who is sharing my worldview of vortical universe.

"UVS" is the future of science. I believe this with all my heart. Even though it will be so hard to break through the minds of the "Restrictive thinking ones".

UVS merely scratches the surfaces of natural science by solving cognitive paradoxes, this is what it could offer for further research in this field. Its hard to break through I agree and it is such an inconvenience truth.

I personally think that dleviwing's theory and Jimbo's theory combined, will eventually be superseded by your "UVS" theory. I believe there is no physical that is not "Vortical".

All that is left, is for you to complete your journey to the beginning of this Universe. I hope I can help in this journey.

Other good TOE theories would also have their strength in different aspects, they would serve various purposes. UVS should humbly have its corner as a singularity model that is evaluated with qualitative methodology at macro level.

I agree with no physical that is not "Vortical".

And you have already helped in many ways, especially the star HL Tau posting has been very awesome.

Thanks.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

If we can quantify gravity as waves, then the vortex motion could kick in... for that we need a possitive result from the gravity waves experiment..

The scaler wave detector did obtain positive results consistently.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

A Black Hole must be the ultimate vortex. Its believed that at the centre of every galaxy is a black hole spinning. This explains the vortex shape of the galaxy. If we look at the Black Hole from Realtivity rather than QM,

The ultimate vortex is the black hole spinning at the center of the ultimate galaxy. On the QM I expect it would be the vortex spinning at the center of an atom or a quark.

jag

Agreed with you Jag, thanks for your comment.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

In my opinion, event causes the vortex, primarily because vortex is a reaction to certain forces within that event. Lets begin with the Big Bang for instance. The Big Bang would have translated into a vortex, however the Bang was caused due to some reason which had nothing to do with the vortex formation

If the Big Bang Universe becomes what it is now in an explosion similar to Type Ia supernova, after T=0 the expansion rate should slow down progressively, such as what is happening to the Crab Nebula now. However, this is not the case.

It was recently discovered that the Universe is expanding in acceleration. Logically, this is sufficient to render the Big Bang model untenable; the Universe is not created in a Big Bang.

UVS can explain all these anomalies in a single model without any major conflict.

[Bruce Ralph]

The idea that forces that create hurricanes and galaxies have similiar origin is not that surprising. But it does'nt then answer the TOE. There is a good possibility that these forces have nothing to do with the beginning of the universe or the cosmos.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Good you found the analogy useful. It was only for containment. However on the voretx front, I am yet to get a connection between the formation of vortices and the forces inside a volcano..

Check out on a UVS topic on force interactions of Bipolar Nebula, there is a section that illustrates on how vortex of molten matter could cause a volcano to form.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Lets look at the volcano. Though volcano does not show a vortex effect (or does it?) the crust tries to contain the magma till some fissure or weak point starts to leak the magma to the surface. Hence in my mind every containment would have a weak point and the energy built up inside would create a vortex which would then 'force' the jets to spiral outwards.

Volcano eruptions do show a vortex effect, evidently major volcano eruptions are associated with solar system alignment.

Based on UVS, focused gravities of solar system alignment could render a strong precession effect acting on viscous matter of a solar system object that would cause a vortex of molten matter to spawn at a center of equilibrium. The vortical motion of molten matter pressurized in confinement could cause a volcano eruption through a weak path in Earth's crust.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

The idea that forces that create hurricanes and galaxies have similiar origin is not that surprising. But it does'nt then answer the TOE. There is a good possibility that these forces have nothing to do with the beginning of the universe or the cosmos.

Hi Bruce Ralph,

Welcome to our vortex club.

Was trying to understand the position on where your comment was coming from and looked up your profile.

You said:

I think the TOE (Theory of Everything) = The TOE (Theory of Energy).

I can swing with that.

And I noticed you are the author of "CONNECT With Planet Earth", clicked on "Preview this book" on "the Planet and the Cosmos", however no content shows up.

Perhaps you can briefly describe your worldview for the beginning of the universe or the cosmos, or start a thread in the TOEQuest Forum to show us your insight for your TOE?

Looking forward for quality correspondences from you.

Thanks.

[G_burnett]

The scaler wave detector did obtain positive results consistently.

I like where this may go Vincent .. at the end there is the ponder of faster then light measurement considered...

Resonant event to mass in motion of transient form state or not in motion ooopps... relativity speaking ... clumped material in condensed state ... no ... too quanta.....

Hmm .. it is going to take more then a paragraph.

What is the resonant ... no what is "a" resonant wave frequency to the Earth ? ... might have to use not logic in that figure ... okay .. what is the resonant empathic frequency of wave that would effect ... lets say hmmm take our pick? Let us stay away from cells though for the time being ..

then we go to what type of wave test and spin detection in the experiment ... no wonder our friend playing the Bongo's got the Nobel! .. very good path indeed .. I will think more of this, may not be back for a while with a post though will read with relish more.

Ty Kind regards G.