The Universal Vortical Singularity

[G_burnett]

here is one related to our family name lol
enjoy Vincent! g.

(We made his puppet)

[G_burnett]

The idea that forces that create hurricanes and galaxies have similar origin is not that surprising. But it does'nt then answer the TOE. There is a good possibility that these forces have nothing to do with the beginning of the universe or the cosmos.

Hi Bruce

I ran across a torus inversion animation where one of the two containment forces directional fail to what we percieve as a big bang a result emit.

This specific torus shape demands consideration to my ponders on the speed of quark for example formation of the same shape on a bit different small formation but able to be advanced pictorially into the big as a containment shape that in breaking gives all to read yet effect.

the question our friend Vincent has answered for me over some time now is the formation is a vortex as is when one of the two containment energies is the one broken after the inversion and a duel vortex effect when the other is the broken containment force ... that is all I am able to say of this event horizon right now as logic demands more data for the full flow chart of questions.

Welcome to the TOE Quest!

kind regards g.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

here is one related to our family name lol
enjoy Vincent! g.

(We made his puppet)

Thanks.

[dipayankar]

It seems simple, but it does make sense as when the orb bursts, the contents will spill and would prevent the formation of a vacuum..

Ty for the reply Dipayankar.. If we use the analogy of two bubbles joining to be one, in our PSI atmosphere and by thus join create notable effect? see the problem?

Its a QM nightmare.

Is there a change of the PSI and where is "it" coming from in the expand? ahh it is already there .. only the potential of push in is effected or degree of potential. .. more mass in the picture of potential and smaller diameter the result from the more mass potential? I know it is what ? Going where ... ? the measure is unfathomable to me at the moment but the event is not and this is not to say the effect is singular to the increase in mass push in effect and the bubble itself in the new state has spinier event in the nature of condense ... for example not conclusive to total in the join to lets say varied state or composite of the two or color variations prior to join.

With out new rules there is no box but with the box there is not new rules. I do not know if I can give your the full answer your require.

The new orb Diameter newly created by the join of two orbs having degree of diameter measured each, is not equal the sum of the two orbs diameter, it is a lesser D then the sum of the two diameters that created the new orb.

And then the orb rises until there is less push in effect and bursts... it seems so simple .. we can not dare to presume.

IMHO kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

Hi Dip

Ty for your reply, My ponder leaves open thought that the vacuum not vacuum has activity going on that in event of the clumping, potential is releasable to effect the push in. the event horizon point zero in my rule one of thought, reached and instantaneous as a flow from dimensional view -1 to +1 in passage of time quantified.

this may be an understanding of the effect of term used fusion event, that the fusion is able by potential available to expand created by the conjoin of two to a lesser space of exist then? the neutron showing FS similarity .. IMHO it is still confusing for me.

I think Einstein was correct to break from his co ponderers and formulate his own questions on the spookiness effect in understanding or hopes to do so and why when you look at him going off on his own ponder maybe why he was doing so a good place to start a bit of a read.

with that I will be back later. kind regards all G.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Lets look at the volcano. Though volcano does not show a vortex effect (or does it?) the crust tries to contain the magma till some fissure or weak point starts to leak the magma to the surface. Hence in my mind every containment would have a weak point and the energy built up inside would create a vortex which would then 'force' the jets to spiral outwards.

Have a look at this paper on "Jupiter and Io Observe Each Other" that suggests that suggest Io undergoes tides and earthquakes on a 42-hour cycle as it orbits Jupiter, is subjected to gravitational wringer that squeeze, stretch and release this moon.

Volcano activities and earthquakes are known to be related.

UVS add that other Jupiter moons and all solar system objects would also contribute to the precession cause wringer effect.

If you view that orbits are vortical motion as illustrated in a UVS topic in cosmic evolution under "Orbits of satellites", you can see that volcano eruption is directly related to vortex effect.

[dipayankar]

The difference between us and Einstein is that he thought of the obnoxious and he proved he was right. We leave our thought in the middle because we do not believe in them. In vortical singularity, there is a thought which is way off the conventional wisdom. Now we need to prove that this concept is right.

Hi Dip

Ty for your reply, My ponder leaves open thought that the vacuum not vacuum has activity going on that in event of the clumping, potential is releasable to effect the push in. the event horizon point zero in my rule one of thought, reached and instantaneous as a flow from dimensional view -1 to +1 in passage of time quantified.

this may be an understanding of the effect of term used fusion event, that the fusion is able by potential available to expand created by the conjoin of two to a lesser space of exist then? the neutron showing FS similarity .. IMHO it is still confusing for me.

I think Einstein was correct to break from his co ponderers and formulate his own questions on the spookiness effect in understanding or hopes to do so and why when you look at him going off on his own ponder maybe why he was doing so a good place to start a bit of a read.

with that I will be back later. kind regards all G.

[dipayankar]

Hi Vincent, somehow the second link did not open. But I got the idea. When we had the chat in Singapore, you mentioned that the eathquakes on earth are a result of a vortical effect in some other place of the Solar System. I forgot the reason behind it. Can you please refresh as to why the vortex effects our earthquake?

Have a look at this paper on "Jupiter and Io Observe Each Other" that suggests that suggest Io undergoes tides and earthquakes on a 42-hour cycle as it orbits Jupiter, is subjected to gravitational wringer that squeeze, stretch and release this moon.

Volcano activities and earthquakes are known to be related.

UVS add that other Jupiter moons and all solar system objects would also contribute to the precession cause wringer effect.

If you view that orbits are vortical motion as illustrated in a UVS topic in cosmic evolution under "Orbits of satellites", you can see that volcano eruption is directly related to vortex effect.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Vincent, somehow the second link did not open. But I got the idea. When we had the chat in Singapore, you mentioned that the eathquakes on earth are a result of a vortical effect in some other place of the Solar System. I forgot the reason behind it. Can you please refresh as to why the vortex effects our earthquake?

"Orbits of satellite", this should link.

I mentioned that based on UVS, the causality of earthquake is from outside of Earth, discussed a complexly inversed illusion that illustrates how it mislead people to think that such events are caused within Earth; a cognitive paradox. (scroll half way down the page.)

Evidently, earthquakes and volcano eruptions are as a result of solar system alignments that cause a precession effect on molten matter underneath Earth's crust. See post 138. See also a UVS topic on Earthquake and volcano eruption.

[G_burnett]

The difference between us and Einstein is that he thought of the obnoxious and he proved he was right. We leave our thought in the middle because we do not believe in them. In vortical singularity, there is a thought which is way off the conventional wisdom. Now we need to prove that this concept is right.

Hi dip Ty for the post.

You are quite right.

"The Big Bang, as for which it is common known, was an intrusion into the area of space and passage of time of space to where it is in the now."

As was is and will be the space was composed of substance in varied state of exist in varied state of motion.

the two identities state of which one was the intruder and one the intruded upon, gives rise to the question and ponder not so much how far the intrusion went as may be the study but to what degree of intrusive takeover took place ... was all the space the effect has happened in effected, all the state of exist effected to the boundaries of the universe?

What about FS, not part of the intruder event or part of the state of event then how could in FS definition be then so effected by the event ... ahh it can not have been looking further then the sand in water to salt in water to air in water... in the simple analogy.

Either then the FS (definition of,) is incorrect, incomplete, or it simply does not exist where the singularity of the all is the all of event effect upon just what was there in the all. FS then a part of the creation state of it all in the big event.

I put forth the compromising ponder that the state of the universe at state of a big event taking place was such that the big event was not complete state of the all but partial composite to what is the all.

There saying thus the explore of all state of exist must be considered as manifest in only varied experimental enlightenments to the human persona understanding.

As we look at the thingies even they have the benefit in use of not logic to give the thousand names of God. (for you theologistical minded.)(and it gives humor)(note the smile in the circle of many great thinkers though out history) ..

Vortex noted gives ponder that leads down a road of empathic interaction(s) of substance regard: "spin." ... this very will give understanding in view from this platform even new math, new geometric pictorial and interesting non simple at times, add of proof to much if not all experimental moments of ponder on other platforms.

IMHO.

Kind regards, g_burnett

(Puppets were the video games of the thirties)