The Universal Vortical Singularity

[dipayankar]

Great... Now I remember. It is actually this way. Though the effect in in the crust of the earth, the root cause could be from outside earth like the SUn and other planets. Now as usual, do you think the gravity of the Sun / other planets has that much of effect to cause siesmic disturbances on earth??

"Orbits of satellite", this should link.

I mentioned that based on UVS, the causality of earthquake is from outside of Earth, discussed a complexly inversed illusion that illustrates how it mislead people to think that such events are caused within Earth; a cognitive paradox. (scroll half way down the page.)

Evidently, earthquakes and volcano eruptions are as a result of solar system alignments that cause a precession effect on molten matter underneath Earth's crust. See post 138. See also a UVS topic on Earthquake and volcano eruption.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Great... Now I remember. It is actually this way. Though the effect in in the crust of the earth, the root cause could be from outside earth like the SUn and other planets. Now as usual, do you think the gravity of the Sun / other planets has that much of effect to cause siesmic disturbances on earth??

That's right.

Factually, combined gravities of Sun and other planets has minuscule direct effect on Earth; it has insignificant effect and this is known. Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, it is the combined precession effect of Sun and other planets that has amplified and resonated on viscous matter of Earth (such as atmospheric layers, open water in oceans and molten matter layer underneath Earth's crust) would cause unisonal vortex to spawn.

When unisonal vortex is spawn in molten matter at a centre of equilibrium underneath Earth's crust, it would cause Earth's crust to oscillate in a concentric manner with seismic waves propagating from this centre of equilibrium as an epicenter.

This is one of the many types of earthquake that could be triggered by the effect of solar system alignment, other types of earthquakes could be caused by tectonic plates movement or wringer effect. However, wringer effect on Earth would not be as significant as it would be for Jupiter's moon Io.

[dipayankar]

Got your point Vincent.

Just a small clarification. The effects of the planetary alignment will be felt or concentrated in one part of the earth. But we see seismic zones at every place on earth. How would you explain this?

That's right.

Factually, combined gravities of Sun and other planets has minuscule direct effect on Earth; it has insignificant effect and this is known. Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, it is the combined precession effect of Sun and other planets that has amplified and resonated on viscous matter of Earth (such as atmospheric layers, open water in oceans and molten matter layer underneath Earth's crust) would cause unisonal vortex to spawn.

When unisonal vortex is spawn in molten matter at a centre of equilibrium underneath Earth's crust, it would cause Earth's crust to oscillate in a concentric manner with seismic waves propagating from this centre of equilibrium as an epicenter.

This is one of the many types of earthquake that could be triggered by the effect of solar system alignment, other types of earthquakes could be caused by tectonic plates movement or wringer effect. However, wringer effect on Earth would not be as significant as it would be for Jupiter's moon Io.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Got your point Vincent.

Just a small clarification. The effects of the planetary alignment will be felt or concentrated in one part of the earth. But we see seismic zones at every place on earth. How would you explain this?

Earth rotates. Strong prcession effect that would cause unisonal vortex to spawn in molten matter triggered by solar sytem objects alignment could occur at different places on Earth at different solar system alignment event. A solar sytems alignment event could occur to focus at any specific location on a rotating Earth at any time.

[G_burnett]

Earth rotates. Strong prcession effect that would cause unisonal vortex to spawn in molten matter triggered by solar sytem objects alignment could occur at different places on Earth at different solar system alignment event. A solar sytems alignment event could occur to focus at any specific location on a rotating Earth at any time.

I like this vincent, specific location is two point zero geometric expanded to be one point zero perspective.

I am leaning toward a static state of no expand in the all now. I can not explain the lean in full yet but find my ponders are going that way.

Kind regards G.

[dipayankar]

So it kind of means that when a seismic disturbance strikes the earth, that unfortunate area was facing that alignment. But how come, we have not been able to scientifically establish this fact as yet? Why do we still study seismology as a part of earth science rather than cosmic science?

Earth rotates. Strong prcession effect that would cause unisonal vortex to spawn in molten matter triggered by solar sytem objects alignment could occur at different places on Earth at different solar system alignment event. A solar sytems alignment event could occur to focus at any specific location on a rotating Earth at any time.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

I like this vincent, specific location is two point zero geometric expanded to be one point zero perspective.

I am leaning toward a static state of no expand in the all now. I can not explain the lean in full yet but find my ponders are going that way.

Kind regards G.

That is how UVS view it, energy is conserved within the boundary of a vast static state that is driven vortically. What we have observed is merely a silhouette in an isolated event of a whole framework.

A UVS topic on "Vortically expanding Universe" illustrates this view.

Best regards.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

So it kind of means that when a seismic disturbance strikes the earth, that unfortunate area was facing that alignment. But how come, we have not been able to scientifically establish this fact as yet? Why do we still study seismology as a part of earth science rather than cosmic science?

Let's just assume UVS is correct on this postulation, like we now know the postulation of spheroidal Earth is correct.

The scientific consensus has endrosed a false fact as a result of a not understood cognitive paradox. This is similar to the consensus of a flat world based on Geocentric model, we now understood this cognitive paradox and therefore know that the flat world fact is false.

Studies for earthquakes that are evidently related to planetary perturbations were raised from time to time in the past (just goggle on "earthquakes correlates with solar systems"), however, they were all deliberated as nonsensical, falisfied quantitatively with an evaluation on tidal force of solar system objects effect to Earth.

This tidal force evaluation method officially adopted by the authorities is errornous, it supports a false fact with wrong assumptions in a cognitive fallacy and does not understand torque-free precession.

"False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science,
for they often endure long;" - Charles Darwin

[G_burnett]

That is how UVS view it, energy is conserved within the boundary of a vast static state that is driven vortically. What we have observed is merely a silhouette in an isolated event of a whole framework.

A UVS topic on "Vortically expanding Universe" illustrates this view.

Best regards.

here may be where we should better define the static state into levels or degrees of state per effect.

did the fundamental matter come from afar to be the sand in the water of fundamental substance? impacting the surface of our universe in a wave or in the ocean to break apart in some bubbly explosion effluence? a clump into little grains? in spin seeking to find each other ... to ponder we are not that small is purely ego one must postulate from such an inversion torus view.

what parameters would be put to the degrees? density for one.

size for another

temperature for a third

shape for a Fourth

charge, polarity,... potential state

speed for the eighth

fluidity for the ninth maybe

and friction state for the tenth

and then there is the eleventh dimension ... when we are bored, the empathy each will show each other ...?

and this will lead to charge positive to negative positive to positive and negative to negative or of course no charge .. but still a compliment by being other

merry Xmas all and seasons greetings to the rest of you.

Graham B.

[dipayankar]

If UVS can prove a seismic disturbance then nobody will doubt its veracity..

Let's just assume UVS is correct on this postulation, like we now know the postulation of spheroidal Earth is correct.

The scientific consensus has endrosed a false fact as a result of a not understood cognitive paradox. This is similar to the consensus of a flat world based on Geocentric model, we now understood this cognitive paradox and therefore know that the flat world fact is false.

Studies for earthquakes that are evidently related to planetary perturbations were raised from time to time in the past (just goggle on "earthquakes correlates with solar systems"), however, they were all deliberated as nonsensical, falisfied quantitatively with an evaluation on tidal force of solar system objects effect to Earth.

This tidal force evaluation method officially adopted by the authorities is errornous, it supports a false fact with wrong assumptions in a cognitive fallacy and does not understand torque-free precession.

"False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science,
for they often endure long;" - Charles Darwin