The Universal Vortical Singularity

[PoPpAScience]

Hi Vincent;

I have seen some of Nassim Haramein's video presentation before and must say that this guy is very insightful. He is into ToE and postulates a holographic fractal structure of the Universe in a singularity that the Space is energy filled and matter is divisions of the energy. I like his thought experiment on dimension and his demonstration on quantization using his "string theory". He also expresses the structure of Universe in geometry framework.

Nassim Haramein at the Rogue Valley Metaphysical
Nassim Haramein - Fractal Structure Of The Universe

I love what Haramein has done with sound. But his postulates on a 'holographic fractal' are nothing special or new to me. No offence.

You and Jim made me aware of 'centripetal force', and Haramein talking about contracting toward "Infinity" without mentioning 'centripetal force', is second rate to you, and Jim.

Jimbo's "Fluid Energy Theory" is superior. When Jim finishes his new book, that he says will be called "The forgotten force", I believe he will supercede most theories about 'centripetal force'.

'Centripetal force', the creator of "Mass".

I believe your theory will explode to great heights once you read Jim's book. I believe this because, you are an evolving enlighten thinker with no barriers that I can see.

UVS postulation on the observable physical Universe could be an intensifying vortical wave event that dilates in a chain reaction with acceleration and therefore fundamental substance falls back on itself in an implosion effect. The illuminated parts of the universe appear to be expanding is merely a silhouette of an intensifying vortical event; an optical illusion in localized perception. The Universe that is not completely visible to us is not necessarily expanding.

What you wrote here is a work of art Vincent. As I said above, your theory is on the road to greatness, and I am so happy to be witnessing it. I sense such a 'humble' nature to you, and this is the key to going beyond the normal enlighten thinkers.

Stay humble my Vortex buddy on your enlightened flow with "Eternity", to you reach the shores of "Infinity".

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent

I wish I was there in that lab with a measurement of the rings right and left as it seems a bit small to do but this flat view is a slice view I would think in the nature of the photography being done.

The knocking of the electron or expand from the nucleus had to be a slow stage by stage vortex type screw out effect or the radiation one would think would have taken the experiment out of condense and thus the black spaces are explained, as further, would be polarity shift of the axial in unison repetition in the rings as you note the swirls.

What would only be more amazing is if the tails of the swirls were alternatively reversed …it’s a bit small for me to see that.

Going back to our European friend in his long forum enlightenment I found it quite strange how basic geometric triangles were placed like I was doing after looking at Saturn for a week or so and I am looking further into his presentations liking the simple base. I also have on my white board what could be a wave depiction on a circle with four wave crest. This pulse in fluid with suspend… ponders down these roads I thought I traveled by myself … to the geometric anyhow.

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent

I have been trying to download a picture in ponder of gravity effect.

I will postulate once more that it is from the cause of lack created in the aether. the Aether having potential fill the lacking tells us that it is an ongoing event. In thus said the effect is not only ongoing but carried by the body of mass that is creating the lacking to allow the potential in the aether to event and there for has direction. In having direction the rule of spinnere event comes into play with consideration of vortex direction of the mass in motion.

Perhaps the easiest way to explain my postulation to evidently conclusiveness is to reference back the event of the water seemingly as noted by the experimenter to seek out the metal ring and as such way a fluid form doing this further considered in the planetary rings of the major gas giants.

In the area of space between a body of mass such as our moon which can be considered a point singularity ring around our planet in vortex event the conditions of the space to lesser density of push in effect creates the tides etal.

In such notice in consideration of avid promote of a gravity effect being the push in effect I believe the force of gravity will be different between the earth and the moon point center of effect then the moons other side.

Including the measurement of earths gravity on the facing equatorial plane on the other side of the earth we would see a variation as well.

If it was a pull in effect there would be no variation and further consideration off this we must determine the composite of the space density or how a void created in clumping event and absorb gets filled by a pull in effect.

Nothing will pull in nothing.

Enjoy the ponder.

Kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

I would like to continue a bit here from posting my picture in an Idea Thread thinking it posted there with the other postulations it will give both inspiration and enlightenment how gravity marries to the other forces and of which I do not think you need enlightenment on Vincent.

I would like to add to my postings here that a black hole is the spin of condensed matter with polarity and does not draw in so much as it does create a massive condition of less dense space where by virtue of spin in the creation other atomic particles are given a free for all to expand into by varied events and clumping on there own in vortex spin.

Predictable in this is in the formation of galaxies there will be solar system creation and in some case actual spin off the arms of matter, Stellar bodies if not whole solar systems, to create further black holes on there own in there own continuum of exist.

I am not yet touching on the final of a black hole or varied event that can take place in the BH event where containment and the parameters of containment fail for it is just here knowing that they do happen the note.

Just my ponder this early evening with sage. ..kind regards g.

[PoPpAScience]

I thought this today Vincent and Graham, and thought I'd share it:

"Infinity" is the 'volume' of "Substance", that some call 'space'.
"Eternity" is the 'continuum' of "Motion", that some call 'time'.

[G_burnett]

I thought this today Vincent and Graham, and thought I'd share it:

"Infinity" is the 'volume' of "Substance", that some call 'space'.
"Eternity" is the 'continuum' of "Motion", that some call 'time'.

Ty for sharing Allen

If I was smart enough i would expand the simple out of mind set to the word call in an exchange that might go

"Infinity is the volume of substance that some measure in quanta of space."

and

"Eternity is the continuum of Motion that some dare to measure in dimensions of time. "

Of course then I would probably have to write papers and attend lectures at some university or something and never get any thought time to myself to figure things out....

Then again if you wish you may do so change with out reservation or citation and i leave such meandering ponder as your "call" in total neutrality.

Kind regard g.

[PoPpAScience]

Ty for sharing Allen

If I was smart enough i would expand the simple out of mind set to the word call in an exchange that might go

"Infinity is the volume of substance that some measure in quanta of space."

and

"Eternity is the continuum of Motion that some dare to measure in dimensions of time. "

Of course then I would probably have to write papers and attend lectures at some university or something and never get any thought time to myself to figure things out....

Then again if you wish you may do so change with out reservation or citation and i leave such meandering ponder as your "call" in total neutrality.

Kind regard g.

Graham I will have to say I like what you have done with your word call exchange. But for me, I always try to use the least amount of words for my quotes. Now though, when I am asked questions while I am on my lecture tour, I can use your words to describe what I am meaning by space and time.

I'll have to say your expression of my quote, is more pleasing to the intellectual eye.

[G_burnett]

Graham I will have to say I like what you have done with your word call exchange. But for me, I always try to use the least amount of words for my quotes. Now though, when I am asked questions while I am on my lecture tour, I can use your words to describe what I am meaning by space and time.

I'll have to say your expression of my quote, is more pleasing to the intellectual eye.

Why thank you sir, I have the habit of nature I can grow on others ponders.

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pd.../0205027v1.pdf

If there is serious wish to propulsion and anti gravity effect, a need professed, perhaps one should look in the area of creating a state of void that will be filled forthwith with fundamental substance event yes… this of course would not so much give propulsion.

In the area of left handed matter though we may find some answers and a direction of thought I would like to converse with others on if interested.

...control of course would be in the consideration of vortex event.

Kind Regards g.

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent

I could not help here but post this link to animations by the Germans needing down load save and unzip by then right click the file and click on play for most systems ..

virus free after check was made .. let me know what you think of some of them especially the first in regards to not just a turned spin but real negative ..?

enjoy, kind regards, g

http://www.temf.de/index.php?id=129&L=0

[G_burnett]

here's looking at you ... jan 7th 2009 recieved by nasa taken the day before ... Compliments of Cassini

and here is a new animation perk by NASA to download and play with
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/video/cassinivirtualtour/



enjoy g