The Universal Vortical Singularity

[G_burnett]

I think you will find this link interesting Vincent; Process Physics. This Cahill fellow does a lot of calculations on the "in-flow" of "Aether". He also adds a lot of good historical information.

I do not know if you seen this pic before, but its on page 49 of above link;
Figure 9: Descartes' vortices carry the planets about the Sun.

A lot to read here and ponder my friend. I have a question one might help with. What particle is holder of the memory given by wave, the neutron, proton or electron and then going lower to quark can we prove this?

I have not made up my mind yet as function of all seem to have varied effect and purpose by both nature and motion state.

Kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

what do you think is happening here? I see the bullet as having continued in its path despite having gone through a vortex spin of substance that is still in motion with a pronounced bow wave on the y axial of it own spin.

IMHO kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

you all on the other side of the world get all the best views sometimes lol ... just in case you haven't heard better get your cameras out ladies and gentlemen sage

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28815223/

[dipayankar]

To break through the vortex, it is required that the 'bullet' has a minimum speed. I wonder if the vortex is a black hole. Then would the bullet be able to break through?

what do you think is happening here? I see the bullet as having continued in its path despite having gone through a vortex spin of substance that is still in motion with a pronounced bow wave on the y axial of it own spin.

IMHO kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

To break through the vortex, it is required that the 'bullet' has a minimum speed. I wonder if the vortex is a black hole. Then would the bullet be able to break through?

I believe it would be more plausible as a singular sling around the vortex then going through. ... look at shift of two red dots on the Y axial and thus gives indication of motion of substance the bullet went through and is now at the higher dot relative to its motion +1 of the event.

Did it get there because it is in a spiral linear? We can make the predict that when it went through it was faster then the other or the other in direction of the +Y axial would have been further along the axial .. and of course we have to look at angular momentum stopping the first now by the effect of the bullet in linear drag of the other to increased spin and less forward momentum.

Thus said to revisit the picture where there is helix tail on the -y axial the pictorial. IMHO

I'm down with the flu right now and probably am not as clear as i should be Dip so will review this post in a few days ,, kind regards g,

[ggullet]

un-heard of yet it has made

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

I love what Haramein has done with sound. But his postulates on a 'holographic fractal' are nothing special or new to me. No offence.

Hi Allen,

Have Haramein done sound experiment with water as well, I must have missed that.

Hi Vincent;
Jimbo's "Fluid Energy Theory" is superior. When Jim finishes his new book, that he says will be called "The forgotten force", I believe he will supercede most theories about 'centripetal force'.

'Centripetal force', the creator of "Mass".

I believe your theory will explode to great heights once you read Jim's book. I believe this because, you are an evolving enlighten thinker with no barriers that I can see.

Looking forward to read Jim's new book on "The forgotten force".

What you wrote here is a work of art Vincent. As I said above, your theory is on the road to greatness, and I am so happy to be witnessing it. I sense such a 'humble' nature to you, and this is the key to going beyond the normal enlighten thinkers.

Stay humble my Vortex buddy on your enlightened flow with "Eternity", to you reach the shores of "Infinity".

You have done more than just witnessing it, you have participated in the development for UVS and had made significant contributions.

In the awe of getting to knowing nature more by the bits, its just natural to become humble by understanding how ignorance I am.

Have some thought on "Eternity", "Infinity" and "Attenuated Infinity", will post this in your thread later.

Best regards,

[ggullet]

a team player would never say "i am a team player"

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Vincent lets look at some time and date for any probable earthquake in 2011. That will really be credible evidance for UVS.

Solar system alignment on 25th to 29th of January 2009

25/01/09 : Aligned Earth-Moon-Mercury-Mars crossed aligned with aligned Earth-Sun-Jupiter crossed aligned with aligned Saturn-Earth-Venus-Uranus

26/01/09 : Aligned Earth-Mercury-Mars crossed aligned with aligned Earth-Moon-Sun-Jupiter crossed aligned with aligned Saturn-Earth-Venus-Uranus

27/01/09 : Aligned Earth-Mercury-Mars crossed aligned with aligned Earth- Sun-Jupiter crossed aligned with aligned Earth-Moon-Neptune-aligned with aligned Saturn-Earth-Venus-Uranus

29/01/09 : Aligned Earth-Mercury-Mars crossed aligned with aligned Earth-Sun-Jupiter crossed aligned with aligned Saturn-Earth-Moon-Venus-Uranus

Notice how Moon moves into different solar system alignments in different days.

During the above solar sytem alignment events, Moon is not at perigee; i.e. not closest to Earth. In fact moon is quite far away at the moment therefore the solar eclipse occurring on 26/01/09 with antumbra of a annular eclipse occurring in South Atlantic Ocean at coordinate around 20° S, 10° E at noon (TY Graham for this info). A further away moon from Earth would have a weaker precession effect on Earth. Although Jupiter is aligned with Sun and Earth, this alignment occurs with Jupiter at a further away distance from Earth behind Sun, thus the precession effect contributes by the aligned Jupiter would also be weaker. Howevers, the two major solar system alignments at a small angle (around 12 degree angle) for Earth-Moon-Mercury-Mars crossed aligned with aligned Earth-Sun-Jupiter would rack up strong combined precession effect on Earth.

If the precession effect could trigger an underwater earthquake as a result of favorable localized circumstances at the moment of aligned Earth-Moon-Sun-Jupiter on 26/01/09 at South Atlantic Ocean at coordinate around 20° S, 10° E at noon, it could cause a tsunami.

The precession effect during these days could trigger clockwise rotating tropical depression, severe tropical storms or even tropical cyclones to occur in South Atlantic Ocean. This effect could mirror to the opposite side of the globe around Hawaii.

Significant tidal bore events could occur at Amazon River during these solar system alignment events.

Clear air vortices driven by intensified subtropical jet stream at southern hemisphere would make aircraft very vulnerable to fall into air-pockets in South Atlantic Ocean at coordinate around 20° S, 10° E during noon and late noon on the two major alignments involving Earth, Moon, Sun, Jupiter and Saturn. See a UVS topic on Bermuda Triangle.

Venice in these solar system alignment events should be flooded by high water levels of flood tides during these days these solar system alignments are occurring during spring tide of a new moon phase would cause tremendrous flood tides.

Eruptions of Kilauea Volcano in Hawaii would increase in these days at the hours when the solar system alignment occurs, when falls right in the path of aligned Earth-Moon-Sun-Jupiter on 26/01/09 at coordinate around 20° S, 10° E on noon at local time, at the same moment it would have cause intensified volcanic activity at midnight on the other side of the globe at Hawaii, volcanic activity as on 24/01/09 is on “Orange Alert”. At near dawn the planetary alignment of Saturn-Earth-Venus-Uranus could also trigger an intense volcanic activity for Kilauea Volcano.

Yellowstone National Park seismic activities should also intensified during these solar system alignment events, occurring in three days consecutively with Moon moving to various alignment with different solar system objects, this scenario is similar to the seismic events that had occurred on 27th to 29th of Dec 2008. Seismic activities for these upcoming events supposedly should peak on 26/01/09 when Earth-Moon-Sun-Jupiter is aligned at noon, and also on 29/01/09 when Saturn-Earth-Moon-Venus-Uranus is aligned at late afternoon. Yellowstone National Park is not directly exposed to the solar system alignments when these events occur, however, the harmonics of a strong precession effect would still kicks in and should be felt although at reduced level for seismic prone locations.


Probable earthquakes in 2011 when Jupiter, Saturn, Sun, Moon and Earth are aligned would have natural events much to look out for. Hopefully, by then I would have sharpened all my tools for orbital elements of solar systems objects. Will follow up on these events when they are around the corner, and it would be fabulous to have a three dimensional real-time solar system modelling set up adequately to get the job done more appropriately.


Disclaimers: The above predictions for natural events on Earth based on unisonal vortex mechanism are rough estimations not fully accounting for all orbital elements of every solar system objects, and with limited knowledge of localized circumstances when the solar system alignment events occur. It merely focus on primary factors for comparative analysis qualitatively with historical data through limited means for the tool used, such as the "Planet finder", "Phases of the Moon" and approximate distance of some solar distance objects. Not everything is completely covered here on generalization for the precession effects on Earth by these solar systems alignments.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Vincent

I could not help here but post this link to animations by the Germans needing down load save and unzip by then right click the file and click on play for most systems ..

virus free after check was made .. let me know what you think of some of them especially the first in regards to not just a turned spin but real negative ..?

enjoy, kind regards, g

http://www.temf.de/index.php?id=129&L=0

Hi Graham,

Nice animations you posted here on waveguides and its carried wave signals. The fundamental dynamics is apparently spin, it refers to electromagnetic waves. IMO, the negative refraction refers to a defined reference frame, the push-in effect on the wave structure externally is commonly refer as postive force, the replusive force counteracting the push-in effect that generates the waveforms are therefore referred as negative force.

I previously studied radar communications on waveguides but I hope I got the facts here correct.

Kind regards,