The Universal Vortical Singularity

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Vincent

hope things are well with your absence noted here.

Have you ever thought of posting here?

http://www.scholarpedia.org/wiki/ind...age&oldid=1286

I am just getting into some of the work in process and roots. .. very interesting.

~ Kind regards g.

Hi Graham,

Thanks for your concern, I am well and fine.

Was contemplating on several issues of nature based on UVS and therefore went into sort of a retreat to quiet my very noisy mind, needed some unperturbed moments; was trying to focus on the issues in contemplation and therefore temporarily shut myself from outside world as much as I could to clear a very clouded mind.

One of the topic I contemplate on was a thought experiment on effect of gravity, which is now quite done. This could perhaps answer Dipayan query on how would UVS account for gravity.

Graham, what effect would gravity have on Vortex. Alternately how would UVS account for gravity.

- Dipayan

Another one was to relate quantum spin geometrically in a three-dimensional spatial model, got more organized in thought now and only need to do the writeup.

For UVS account for gravity, I extend it on the bubble model:

This soap bubble model explains the anomaly on the isotropy of gravitational force of all celestial objects in the physical universe; within a boundary when viscous matter is at rest (in a reference frame) its volumetric pressure is isotropic, it acts with equal magnitude in all directions. See fluid statics, energy density and casimir effect.

The size of a bubble is proportional to its potential energy, in isotropy the energy of the bubble wall is proportional to the area of a sphere 4¶r², and the proportional energy of negative contribution to the interior volume of the bubble would be affected by a larger factor as the volume of a sphere is (4/3)¶r³.

A thought experiment with huge bubble held in deep ocean


...A balloon....Inverse-square law illustration

For dramatic effect in a thought experiment, imagine a huge balloon filled with air (lets say its size is one kilometer) is held in deep ocean, the volume of air within the balloon is encapsulated in an ocean of water would therefore be subjected to tremendous pressure. The air in the balloon displaces a volume of water would push outwardly in isotropy (barring that water pressure is relative to its depth would cause variation in uniformity of the isotropy effect) is met with an with an equal opposite force of the water mass in ocean that pushes inward around the balloon in isotropy with a primary pressurization effect of the ocean. Water pushes around the balloon would be compacted to have density gradient following the inverse-square law of water pressure according to the volume of water displaced, hence the density of water around the balloon would be higher according to square of distance at region nearer to the surface of the balloon. See compressibility of water (molecule).

Drop a tiny pebble (with density just slightly higher that water) into the ocean so that it would drop vertically down (assuming there is no drift in water) to pass near the balloon. When the pebble drops near the balloon in a region of water that has higher density, it would be deflected towards the balloon in a push-in manner by higher density water around the balloon and therefore the pebble drops in a curve path on its way down. If the density of a barrier of water around the balloon is compressed to be higher than the density of the pebble, and if the dropping pebble could not overcome the escape velocity of the higher density water when it got near the balloon, the pebble would be caught in a high density region of water pushing it towards the balloon and held levitated on a barrier of water (with higher density than the pebble) that surrounds very near the huge balloon. These push-in effects are similar to the effects of gravitational force.

Release small air bubbles below the huge balloon, on their way up seeking least resistance paths these air bubbles would be repelled away in curve paths by the higher density water around the huge balloon. This repelling effect that air bubbles could not pass through a higher density barrier of water is similar to solar wind is deflected by the magnetosphere of a planet.

Even though electrostatically induced forces seem to be rather weak in a subatomic scenario, the electrostatic force between e.g. an electron and a proton, that together make up a hydrogen atom, is about 40 orders of magnitude stronger than the gravitational force acting between them. Based on Universal Vortical Singularity, in a paradigm, the electrostatic force that occurs in isotropy within a galactic plasmatic spheroid that withheld the structure of a galaxy is similarly much stronger than gravitational force. Gravitational force in a local reference frame is an electrostatic push-in effect, holistically in another higher order reference frame it is an electromagnetic push-in effect. See Universal Vortical Singularity clarifies the concept of gravity.

For the full version of this bubble model that explains push-in effect of gravity, explore a section under "The geometrical structure of an atom", scroll halfway down the page.

Best regards,

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Vincent
Have you ever thought of posting here?

http://www.scholarpedia.org/wiki/ind...age&oldid=1286

I am just getting into some of the work in process and roots. .. very interesting.

~ Kind regards g.

Hi Graham,

Thanks for informing me on Scholarpedia, I like the idea they have on curatorship.

Will consider to post a topic of UVS there that I have more comfortable with; if I can find one, lol. This is a public peer review platform for established scientific theories, most of my articles based on an unconvention hypothesis of UVS could probably be acutely attacked there. Will watch over its development and ponder about it.

So how was your posting there doing? Any link?

Thanks.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

I think you will find this link interesting Vincent; Process Physics. This Cahill fellow does a lot of calculations on the "in-flow" of "Aether". He also adds a lot of good historical information.

I do not know if you seen this pic before, but its on page 49 of above link;
Figure 9: Descartes' vortices carry the planets about the Sun.

Hi Allen,

I do find this is an interesting link and there is also quite a bit to read on.

Yes I have ever saw an image similar to the pic on page 49 of the link before. It is from Jimbo's FET book on page 208 in figure 55, these pics portrayed a scenario of Descartes' star cluster. I have this same vision for star cluster before I came across this pics or come to know a rarely mentioned Rene Descartes and his work. Was pleasantly surprised that there were thinkers that have similar thought on this in extensive works, that I am not imagining things out of the blue in non-sequitur manner.

I did not draw this vision of UVS for star cluster that form a galaxy, however, it was described and illustrated in several UVS topics as cosmic scale molecules and plasmatic bubble cluster, one of this is in "Geometrical structure of a galaxy".

Thanks.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

what do you think is happening here? I see the bullet as having continued in its path despite having gone through a vortex spin of substance that is still in motion with a pronounced bow wave on the y axial of it own spin.

IMHO kind regards graham

Hi Graham,

I am aware of Bullet galaxy clusters, used it to illustrate cosmic vortices of a binary galaxy cluster system before. It was eventually replaced with x-ray image for Cartwheel galaxy group to explain black hole, dark matter and dark energy.



The Bullet cluster (1E 0657-56) is said to consist of two colliding clusters of galaxies, this is similar to binary star system in a two paradigm shift up; intead of a two star system, it is a two galaxy cluster system. The pink glows appear to me as lower latitude cosmic vortices facing each other, have occurred on two interacting cosmic spheroids on their close encounter with each other in a precession effect as a binary galaxy cluster system.

Just my thought based on UVS.

I might put this article back to the dark matter page or else where to complete the paradigm of cosmic binary sytems as in:
- Binary star system - Star system SS443
- Binary galaxy system - Binary King Galaxy or Cartwheel galaxy group
- Binary galaxy cluster system - Bullet galaxy cluster



Kind regards,

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

un-heard of yet it has made

Hi ggullet,

Warmest welcome to this vortex thread.

From conventional knowledge point of view with current establishments, the hypothetical model of UVS is indeed unheard-of.

However, such concept is not entirely new, lately it was brought to my awareness by Jimbo that in the seventeen century Rene Descartes had postulated the concept of whirlpool universe, had dominated for a century in Europe until refuted by Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887. Since then this basic idea of universe was buried, forgotten and lost for more than one century, it is a falsified theory in the context of modern science and modern cosmology.

Nevertheless, more and more empirical evidence using more advance latest technologies is indicating that the famous Michelson-Morley experiment is a fallacy.

Once again, welcome to our vortex club and I can say that there are plenty to explore and to rethink based on a vortical universe model.

Best to you,

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

while we are on the subject i ran across this little tibbit of news/

enjoy all

~kind regards g
http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/mpa/r...2009-1-en.html

Hi Graham,

This is a hyper-velocity star of Milkyway that has achieved escape velocity and dislodges from its spiral arm at outer rim of the galaxy. The speculation of how such star achieve escape velocity could be a disruption of a binary star system, or pulled by a nearby galaxy cluster in a tidal effect.

Milkyway is known to have ripped off the stars of globular clusters and satellite galaxies.

Interesting for hyper-velocity star ejected out of a main galaxy in this document stated that these very massive stars would die in a supernova explosion. It is an empirical evidence I have been looking for to account for the evolution of a star at the stage of a diffused star in a galactic vortex scenario; based on UVS, supernova is caused by a lack of vortical driving force from the galactic vortex to consolidate the star after it is dislodged from its stellar arm.

TY Graham.

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham,

This is a hyper-velocity star of Milky way that has achieved escape velocity and dislodges from its spiral arm at outer rim of the galaxy. The speculation of how such star achieve escape velocity could be a disruption of a binary star system, or pulled by a nearby galaxy cluster in a tidal effect.

Milky way is known to have ripped off the stars of globular clusters and satellite galaxies.

Interesting for hyper-velocity star ejected out of a main galaxy in this document stated that these very massive stars would die in a supernova explosion. It is an empirical evidence I have been looking for to account for the evolution of a star at the stage of a diffused star in a galactic vortex scenario; based on UVS, supernova is caused by a lack of vortical driving force from the galactic vortex to consolidate the star after it is dislodged from its stellar arm.

TY Graham.

NO!TY!... im heading for the hills lol. ..

Hi Vincent, glad to hear you are doing fine. The creation of the orb leaving must be visited. The eddy of spin created first in a so called bh that created the state of emptiness the substance began in motion relative to fill goes back to my rule one revisit IMH. The Galaxy begins to form. As it does the clumping potential is realized in varied way to creation of measurable state, the orb, with such state as would be measured mass and velocity and placement in the galactic event, not inclusive here to the all state, allows the view predict of what has been the event of escape. This leads of course to the reality that density of the aether is varied ... static state a varied effect in density and created state a varied effect in varied density state of potential.

Does the black hole form first or the galaxy form first ... of course the black hole forms first be the postulation and the bh the result of a rule one begin of substance in transient form parallel interaction or forward motion curtailed by spinier interaction of two forces and one curtailed such as the airplane entropy stopping on a runway in just a few feet as one wheel is braked.

Does this hold true to the quanta dimension? IMHO right now, predictable yes. i will read up some more on this.

Kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham,

Thanks for informing me on Scholarpedia, I like the idea they have on curator ship.

Will consider to post a topic of UVS there that I have more comfortable with; if I can find one, lol. This is a public peer review platform for established scientific theories, most of my articles based on an unconventional hypothesis of UVS could probably be acutely attacked there. Will watch over its development and ponder about it.

So how was your posting there doing? Any link?

Thanks.

I do not think it would be attacked there and if so what the h, let the discussions fall where they may. I personally am somewhat afraid to post a paper less i have to keep on doing it and have no time for ponder lol.

Note my lack of scientific term at times so as to not find more then direction of other. I may later though.
http://grahampeterburnett.spaces.liv...7762!194.entry

Sage is doing his thing though in the all worlds pub lately an dropped his theory of everything in a few unfinished parts as he pondered doing a video .. you have missed a few things there as you and dip were stirring up a vortex and spun out to space ... a yeti was chasing Robert naked in the Asian range looking like a numnum pink snow berry .. things like that. ... Mikal was stealing my drinks and waving unmentionables over her head as they took effect ... Carly had a secret admirer in the way of cart pulling slow bot from china left out in the cold ... Robert time traveled and got cloned and nanobot GPS units infected the whole place for while... other then that you did not miss much.



kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent

I realized on my 93rd sneeze this morning that my cold is going away. Gravity effect in consideration of density of two substance has to be a visit IMH, thank you Vincent for the links again to to your site on gravity.

The reason for this is taking the scenario that we want as an exist to just float at will above the earth.

To do this in the restriction of density of mass we would either have to be the expanding balloon or be in less dense state blown up so to speak ... this is not practical for obvious reasons of exist.

If we were the creator of a spin bow wave where we filled the more dense by being less dense the event of rise into such pushed out of the more dense then we have the simple of a balloon being the riser and us under pulled.

The sails of space travel effect having the potential to collect and move forward to fill the emptiness of substance in space so a real sail event as we might see on earth in ocean and lake sail craft the event of motion, what then would be the sail in space?

We already have the push effect possible using the sun emit against an absorbing sail reacting to the push but I am thinking more of something else.

A push effect of upon substance predictable to a move forward event to fill the void created ahead of the creation there by keeping the rest at bay as part of the effect.

Taking this one step further in the mind expand this morning why is it not possible to consider that in taking the substance moved away from the direction of travel and collecting it behind the event? To the prediction we can do this then we have a quantity of matter aiding the direction of travel and less a push in effect to the forward expand event and the side effect of unlimited collected energy that can be put to function, on board.

How about it, any one want to go for a ride?

Kind regards, g.

[G_burnett]

This is an interesting link or ponder and add. Note how they are referencing the Coriolis effect
http://www.livescience.com/environme...formation.html

http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...formation.html
enjoy g.