The Universal Vortical Singularity

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

This is an interesting link or ponder and add. Note how they are referencing the Coriolis effect
http://www.livescience.com/environme...formation.html

http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...formation.html
enjoy g.

Hi Graham,

Please pardon my bluntness, based on cyclonic gravity effect of UVS, Coriolis effect is a cargo cult science.

It baffles me that Coriolis effect had achieved scientific consensus at all. Some physicists had fired missiles from North to South direction in northern hemisphere to prove the right deflection with quantitative prediction, there is a fundamental flaw in this experiment, they did not fire the missiles from South to North in northern hemisphere. Experiments were also done by dropping lead pallets in deep mine shaft in different parts of the world by individual groups to predict the deflection quantitatively with high accuracy is also qualitatively erroneous with inexplicable anomalies; the problem lies in this one-dimensional vector study for a three-dimensional spatial-vector phenomenon. The turntable experiment that uses a selective method to illustrate Coriolis effect on a projectile is simply erroneous qualitatively.

IMO, (find it hard to include the word humble ), the deduced deflections predicted by Coriolis effect quantitatively in these experiments are fallacies qualitatively. These experiments forwarded as proof of Coriolis effect can be easily refuted, however, I will not argue with anyone who held Coriolis effect as his belief irregardless of qualitative reasoning.

Kind regards, vincent.

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham,

Please pardon my bluntness, based on cyclonic gravity effect of UVS, Coriolis effect is a cargo cult science.

It baffles me that Coriolis effect had achieved scientific consensus at all. Some physicists had fired missiles from North to South direction in northern hemisphere to prove the right deflection with quantitative prediction, there is a fundamental flaw in this experiment, they did not fire the missiles from South to North in northern hemisphere. Experiments were also done by dropping lead pallets in deep mine shaft in different parts of the world by individual groups to predict the deflection quantitatively with high accuracy is also qualitatively erroneous with inexplicable anomalies; the problem lies in this one-dimensional vector study for a three-dimensional spatial-vector phenomenon. The turntable experiment that uses a selective method to illustrate Coriolis effect on a projectile is simply erroneous qualitatively.

IMO, (find it hard to include the word humble ), the deduced deflections predicted by Coriolis effect quantitatively in these experiments are fallacies qualitatively. These experiments forwarded as proof of Coriolis effect can be easily refuted, however, I will not argue with anyone who held Coriolis effect as his belief irregardless of qualitative reasoning.

Kind regards, vincent.

hi my friend, I do not mind bluntness, love it. ...ty for the reply I wondered on this effect.

I will have to get back to you later as I am working on something on the white board these days only.

Kind regards Graham

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent

In review I must clearly state that the posting of the link i did was to the paradox that can develop not that the force was more then fictional or more then the change of view that would take place due to relativity.

Any testing that was done I am sure was done to open the minds of set ... a good example for an instructor to get his students thinking or something of the sort ... lol

kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

Forces are cyclic in nature but also radial. Hence they lead us from one point to another...

The ponder of this more and thinking of this i go back to saying radial would be part of the ~varied state and the cyclic the quanta. Radiation (heat) the oil or lube to the boundary and allow the more velocity of cyclic state to the effect of radial event ... the cyclic state would be with axial exist and polar bond thus the predicable but not found in the quark as a mf ... a bond and stretching of the quark flavor collapse of what we would percieve a field bond but in effect the substance itself still attached because it is "screwed" on the ca-join ... that is in the simple predictable picture I have Dip.

This explains the bond not unscrewing as the torque forces increase the bond by collapse and screwing the matter/substance quanta together tighter ... and tighter.

these are not polar state magnetic slide a possible event but in the conjoin ... not possible a slide event. They pop the axial and we see the quark ... IMHO

kind regards graham

[dipayankar]

Many feel that all forces are basically electrostatic in nature. Do you also feel the same?

The ponder of this more and thinking of this i go back to saying radial would be part of the ~varied state and the cyclic the quanta. Radiation (heat) the oil or lube to the boundary and allow the more velocity of cyclic state to the effect of radial event ... the cyclic state would be with axial exist and polar bond thus the predicable but not found in the quark as a mf ... a bond and stretching of the quark flavor collapse of what we would percieve a field bond but in effect the substance itself still attached because it is "screwed" on the ca-join ... that is in the simple predictable picture I have Dip.

This explains the bond not unscrewing as the torque forces increase the bond by collapse and screwing the matter/substance quanta together tighter ... and tighter.

these are not polar state magnetic slide a possible event but in the conjoin ... not possible a slide event. They pop the axial and we see the quark ... IMHO

kind regards graham

[G_burnett]

Many feel that all forces are basically electrostatic in nature. Do you also feel the same?

The electrostatic forces are external collection IMHO and i am with ponder here a bit deeper of an exist due to polarity creation by substance flow .. and vortical spin not so much linear frictional perhaps. The difference to linear slide or not and reason for the bond being the curvature of model.

kind regards g.

[dipayankar]

I did not understand ' Reason for the bond being the curvature of the model'...

The electrostatic forces are external collection IMHO and i am with ponder here a bit deeper of an exist due to polarity creation by substance flow .. and vortical spin not so much linear frictional perhaps. The difference to linear slide or not and reason for the bond being the curvature of model.

kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

I did not understand ' Reason for the bond being the curvature of the model'...

as the picture might be clear the a example with a torque would not slide as easily as the b example to the same centrifugal torque forces.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Many feel that all forces are basically electrostatic in nature. Do you also feel the same?

I am one of these people who felt it this way.

[dipayankar]

Great...... actually only gravity cannot be explained by electrostatic forces....

I am one of these people who felt it this way.