The Universal Vortical Singularity

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Great...... actually only gravity cannot be explained by electrostatic forces....

Reinstate aether with absolute motion into the equation could explain the effect of gravity renders by electrostatic forces in isotropy.

[G_burnett]

Ok,

Absolute motion. Can this be ~ absolute velocity being created the event? What rewrite would take place?


A self sustaining spinier event that is created by the directional application of forces self contained to the model to increase the effect and with frame drag of the more massive part all then the model go to spin with ~ continued increase of velocity.

It just spins faster and faster ... to what state then i have asked ... fundamental substance? We will find out soon i believe.

kind regards g.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Ok,

Absolute motion. Can this be ~ absolute velocity being created the event? What rewrite would take place?

Hi Graham, informally, here it goes:

Electrostatics in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid is the phenomenon of stationary electric charges confined within electrically isolated boundaries of the nested spheroid as a rest mass in an inertia reference frame; this is the effect of aether in absolute space moving in absolute motion with vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into boundaries and move the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid to manifest as the four known forces of nature. In isotropy of an apparently stationary and resonated plasmatic bubble with repulsive electrostatics force it renders the effect of gravity.

Need to borrow you quote again on "if you know what I mean please explain it to me..".

Kind regards,

[G_burnett]

Hi Graham, informally, here it goes:

Electrostatics in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid is the phenomenon of stationary electric charges confined within electrically isolated boundaries of the nested spheroid as a rest mass in an inertia reference frame; this is the effect of aether in absolute space moving in absolute motion with vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into boundaries and move the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid to manifest as the four known forces of nature. In isotropy of an apparently stationary and resonated plasmatic bubble with repulsive electrostatics force it renders the effect of gravity.

Need to borrow you quote again on "if you know what I mean please explain it to me..".

Kind regards,

Hi Vincent .. I have changed a couple words as may be needed to not use plural form and for personal clarity to how i have been reading it, feel free of course to use or not but if not possibly you can clarify ?

...the other bottom still not clear to me but will ponder a bit on it for further comment.

Very good, i know the final sentence is a hard one and quite possible residue thought?

I have also tried to break down the long sentence into multi for clarity but I am not an English major lol just have a good MS office program edit.

Electrostatic potential energy, in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid, is the phenomenon of stationary electric charge confined within electrically isolated boundary of the nested spheroid as an at-rest mass, of matter, in an inertia reference frame.

Thus above so postulated (citation needed) is the effect of aether potential in absolute space moving in absolute motion, with vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into boundary state exist and move the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid.

Thus further so considered to manifest in the whole ToE as the four known effective force in of nature a conjoin.

In isotropy of an apparently stationary and resonated plasmatic bubble with repulsive electrostatics force it renders the effect of gravity. {This is still not clear.}

kind regards G.

[neutralino]

Reinstate aether with absolute motion into the equation could explain the effect of gravity renders by electrostatic forces in isotropy.

Sorry, what do you mean here by "aether"?

[G_burnett]

.....nested spheroid to manifest as the four known forces of nature.

.....,

pondering further Vincent I might add that this shape, undulating in quark composite is not the only one ... the word bothers me personally as too inclusive to circular state of exist but on the quanta ... sometimes ... it changes....we know by the laws that this will happen if one negative in the tube is spin high and the other low we have undulation effect of the Almighty torus to vortex visual ... eventually. ... -> which leads to tunnel and change in the state of the Photon axial? Just streams of thought here. ,,

Why would this term you use be the best then would be my question right now of ponder ... it is quite inclusive to the state of define you are doing in that dimension of measure I will admit.

Kind regards g.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Vincent .. I have changed a couple words as may be needed to not use plural form and for personal clarity to how i have been reading it, feel free of course to use or not but if not possibly you can clarify ?

...the other bottom still not clear to me but will ponder a bit on it for further comment.

Very good, i know the final sentence is a hard one and quite possible residue thought?

I have also tried to break down the long sentence into multi for clarity but I am not an English major lol just have a good MS office program edit.

Wow! Thanks for your help Graham and it is very much appreciated, this has made the context clearer. The very casual discussion with Dip has turn out to be quite a wonderful synopsis. Have to learn how to use the MS office program edit you are using, there are much to clean up in my write-ups of UVS topics. And I have to comment this is a neat use of razor. When I started out with the sentence, it was meant to be singular, half way down the writing for the pictorial thought the image of nested spheroids came in when trying to express the boundaries, was unable to write it in the singular form at then; that was what happened.

Electrostatic potential energy, in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid, is the phenomenon of stationary electric charge confined within electrically isolated boundary of the nested spheroid as an at-rest mass, of matter, in an inertia reference frame.

Thus above so postulated (citation needed) is the effect of aether potential in absolute space moving in absolute motion, with vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into boundary state exist and move the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid.

Thus further so considered to manifest in the whole ToE as the four known effective force in of nature a conjoin.

In isotropy of an apparently stationary and resonated plasmatic bubble with repulsive electrostatics force it renders the effect of gravity. {This is still not clear.}

kind regards G.

Further to your edit, here is some changes I have made, in bold prints are the added word, in blue texts are the rephrased sentences:

Electrostatic potential energy, in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid, is the phenomenon of stationary electric charge confined within electrically isolated boundary of the nested spheroid as an at-rest mass, of matter, in an inertia reference frame.

Thus above so postulated (citation needed) is the effect of aether potential in absolute space moving in absolute motion, with vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into resonated boundary state exist, and moves the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid vortically. The vortical effects in unison would manifest as the four known fundamental forces of nature in a unisonal conjoin.

In isotropy of an apparently stationary plasmatic spheroid that is likened to a plasmatic bubble, with repulsive electrostatic force in the encapsulation of the nested spheroid, it would render an electrostatic potential density that follows the principle of inverse-square law; this causes the effect of gravity.

What would be the appropriate citation in your opinion for the "citation needed" ? Would this section as below be suffice"

Conceivably, the nested magnetospheres of a planet is encompassed and compressed by the nested magnetospheres of its star, and the vortically consolidated molecular star clusters as galaxy formed in the accretion disc of the galactic vortex are encompassed and compressed by the nested magnetospheres of the galactic spheroid. In a paradigm the galactic spheroids are vortically consolidated as molecular clusters, apparently as galaxy clusters spiraling in a cosmic vortex they are encompassed and compressed by the nested magnetospheres of the cosmic spheroid.

Have included these paragraphs into "The geometrical structure of an atom" under "The fundamental cause for gravity".

This writeup added to the web page is open for further suggestions to make improvements, will get updated as it goes along.

Thanks.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Sorry, what do you mean here by "aether"?

It refers the classical aether that was falsified by the famous Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887.

Based on Hannes Alfvén's plasma cosmology, UVS postulates it as "astrophysical plasma in its elementary form as a scalable viscous medium that is pervasive throughout the entire physical universe".

In modern astronomy, imo, it was optically detected using Chandra X-ray technique in Hubble space telescope and indirectly observed using a gravitation lensing technique on HST, is cited as "dark matter" by NASA scientists.

Here is my page on this aether with details.

Thanks for your interest and inquiry.

Best regards,

[G_burnett]

Wow! Thanks for your help Graham and it is very much appreciated, this has made the context clearer. The very casual discussion with Dip has turn out to be quite a wonderful synopsis. Have to learn how to use the MS office program edit you are using, there are much to clean up in my write-ups of UVS topics. And I have to comment this is a neat use of razor. When I started out with the sentence, it was meant to be singular, half way down the writing for the pictorial thought the image of nested spheroids came in when trying to express the boundaries, was unable to write it in the singular form at then; that was what happened.



Further to your edit, here is some changes I have made, in bold prints are the added word, in blue texts are the rephrased sentences:

Electrostatic potential energy, in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid, is the phenomenon of stationary electric charge confined within electrically isolated boundary of the nested spheroid as an at-rest mass, of matter, in an inertia reference frame.

Thus above so postulated (citation needed) is the effect of aether potential in absolute space moving in absolute motion, with vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into resonated boundary state exist, and moves the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid vortically. The vortical effects in unison would manifest as the four known fundamental forces of nature in a unisonal conjoin.



In isotropy of an apparently stationary plasmatic spheroid that is likened to a plasmatic bubble, with repulsive electrostatic force in the encapsulation of the nested spheroid, it would render an electrostatic potential density that follows the principle of inverse-square law; this causes the effect of gravity.

What would be the appropriate citation in your opinion for the "citation needed" ? Would this section as below be suffice"

Conceivably, the nested magnetospheres of a planet is encompassed and compressed by the nested magnetospheres of its star, and the vortically consolidated molecular star clusters as galaxy formed in the accretion disc of the galactic vortex are encompassed and compressed by the nested magnetospheres of the galactic spheroid. In a paradigm the galactic spheroids are vortically consolidated as molecular clusters, apparently as galaxy clusters spiraling in a cosmic vortex they are encompassed and compressed by the nested magnetospheres of the cosmic spheroid.

Have included these paragraphs into "The geometrical structure of an atom" under "The fundamental cause for gravity".

This writeup added to the web page is open for further suggestions to make improvements, will get updated as it goes along.

Thanks.

Hi Vincent, ty for the wow but it may be just a rare moment for me i think.

What you seem to be discribing is a marry of electostatic internal to the external using the event of vortex spinnier and common belief the result in the define of what is a condenser and undefined dimensionaly the boundary except to show the shell for all intent an purpose has to be considerred thus will exist inverse law accepted.

so in that conclusion, correct me if wrong, I submit the follow of change to your post again.
Electrostatic potential energy, in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid model, is the phenomenon of stationary static electric charge confined within an electrical (is the electrical the cause of the boundary?) isolated boundary of the nested spheroid as an at-rest mass, of matter, in an inertia reference frame.

Thus, above so postulated (citation needed above pointers to be inserted then said with comma in this sentence { with citation noted}) (this leads the reader to a continuation state of read of theorem built of other) is the effect of aether potential in absolute space moving in absolute motion. To postulate further predict is the event with vortical momentum event that would with the vortical, consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into a resonant boundary state of exist. The event moves the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid in vortical spin predict. (Possibly here describing the undulation that takes place in paradox pictorial view by different dimensional review and is described where it would seem like two charges around the center but is one alone still the dimension)(the sliced through view of a torus tube with a top of the tube exiting face on the left exist of charge on one side and bottom exist of the ingoing to tube charge exist on the right)( This view in center of charge each side having the outer tube boundary then drawable of a peanut shape?) The vortical effects in unison would manifest as the four known fundamental forces of nature in unison conjoin. (thus on the small acceptable by all)

In isotrop of an apparently stationary plasmatic spheroid that is as to a plasmatic bubble by compare, then is with repulsive electrostatic force in the encapsulation of the nested spheroid. Such can be predicted to render an electrostatic potential density that follows the principle of inverse-square law and a cause to effect of attraction for surface enrichment from external matter many time more then conventional view of gravity force.

What would be the appropriate citation in your opinion for the "citation needed”? Would this section as below be suffice"

Conceivably, the nested multi magnetosphere of a planet is encompassed and compressed by the nested multi magnetosphere of it star. Further, the vortically consolidated molecular star cluster as galaxy, formed in the accretion disc of the galactic vortex, are encompassed and compressed by the nested multi magnetosphere of the galactic spheroid.

In a paradigm the galactic spheroid model is vortical consolidate as molecular cluster, apparently as galactic cluster spiral in a cosmic vortex, such are encompassed and compressed in state by the nested multi magnetosphere of the cosmic spheroid model.

(Yes you are going into the big verry well here)


Have included these paragraphs into "The geometrical structure of an atom" under

"The fundamental cause for gravity".

The citation should maybe point to define of “condenser” by others and evidentiary brass rod explosion in NASA surprise when it hit the comet they explored a bit ago.
Some sentence were long still and I went and changed more plural to singular form getting rid of the s's and describing the object using multi and again just for my own clarity of thought trying to grasp the ponder. …

I will write on gravity later a bit more for your review as it does indeed in vortex ponder have marriage. IMHO

Kind regards g.

[neutralino]

It refers the classical aether that was falsified by the famous Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887.

I thought as much. So, what are the problems with the Michelson Morley experiment?