The Universal Vortical Singularity

[dipayankar]

Einstein actually forwarded the thought process of Newton and other classical physicists. Though I have very high regards for Einstein. I somehow cannot forget the role of the classical physicists in the journey of physics and science.

I have a hard time not putting Einstein in the realm of physics Dip to your listing elsewhere in the TOE to be no classical his ponders. Why would you say Dip he is not classical physics...

My head is in ponder with the shape of a double Mobius. I am thinking the wonderful capabilities these days of a machine shop that they could cut one for sure to a certain equality and balance of form circular and picture it ultimate shape to be tubular with etched netting per sec rotating on the outer surface of the tube to give a guide for ponder further.

This shape I have in my head is based on the two plate variation of two axial (wobble) Vincent ... the motion creating the double Mobius 720 degrees if we went into the thought of having a point singularity of substance traveling in the tube or slice pictorial moment of motion ... a snapshot sort of thing if needed for a define.

Creating the point singularity (put your idea here to the shape of the moment) following the rules of redshift of course is my direction.

Why you might ask but all I can say is I think it worthy in the nature of "why she stopped light" (Harvard reviews) lol .... I base the ponder on the Bow wave of pressure out there in the compare creating the continue of ability to do work. That is about the simple i can write my thoughts on all this right now.

Enjoy, kind regards, graham

[G_burnett]

I think the full picture in Physics is overlooked in the simple. All we can percieve as atomic structure represents a bare 4% or so of the full universe Dip.
We have a very limited perspective of the all staying with the 4%, a very limited view. In reality we have to concentrate on the other.

When I dance with my wolf dog there has been a moment of ... lets say hang time in my movements and leaps and spins where gravity fails and she misses me in rush after rush ... it is so normal to her to this happening ... yet when i reach into the state of meditation sometimes through chanted song she will not let me get down there. .. what does this have to do with physics? ...

Simply it is what I do not understand. Einstein was quite clear to time travel, it would not be possible. At the same ponder what was thought i believe by him was being able to view time other then the now or the past but indeed the future. ... if one agrees with this then the human exist should be able to do this with no mechanical means other then the QM of the human existence and state.

We are first and for most just components of the whole of the universe and then to ... in motion. Thus you are quite right to consider the classics for all that I personally look at in the define goes to those classic thoughts and passed on ponders of others.

Classical meaning original...

~Kind regards, Graham

[dipayankar]

You are correct when you say we know not more than 5% of what there actually is. But for Einstein to understand physics in totally in this knowledge of 5% would have been very difficult if not impossible.

I think the full picture in Physics is overlooked in the simple. All we can percieve as atomic structure represents a bare 4% or so of the full universe Dip.
We have a very limited perspective of the all staying with the 4%, a very limited view. In reality we have to concentrate on the other.

When I dance with my wolf dog there has been a moment of ... lets say hang time in my movements and leaps and spins where gravity fails and she misses me in rush after rush ... it is so normal to her to this happening ... yet when i reach into the state of meditation sometimes through chanted song she will not let me get down there. .. what does this have to do with physics? ...

Simply it is what I do not understand. Einstein was quite clear to time travel, it would not be possible. At the same ponder what was thought i believe by him was being able to view time other then the now or the past but indeed the future. ... if one agrees with this then the human exist should be able to do this with no mechanical means other then the QM of the human existence and state.

We are first and for most just components of the whole of the universe and then to ... in motion. Thus you are quite right to consider the classics for all that I personally look at in the define goes to those classic thoughts and passed on ponders of others.

Classical meaning original...

~Kind regards, Graham

[G_burnett]

The look at the nature of things Dip and i mean things not the un perceivable, gives great clues to the nature of what you are of ponder.

take the tree for an example and if first looking at one it can be the observation that the closer to the ground branches extend from the trunk much further then the top branches. It is just that they at the bottom had more time to grow one would ponder.

Then it is noticed that closer to the trunk on these lower branches there are less foliage on the branches. .. why then is the tree not bushy one could ponder. ... on and on goes the whys till one sees the structure itself of the lowest needle on the pine or the very bud of a spring leaf is the key.

Not the whole tree but the into the small of the whole we go. The demand indeed of symmetry from that lowest point manifests to the structure.

Einstein saw the shape of a ball split in two and then joined to the same symmetry of structure needed by the tree. ... if the shape was not there then the whole would not work. ... just my morning thought.

Enjoy, ~Graham

[Graybeard]

LIFE: OUTLINES OF GENERAL BIOLOGY
BY SIR J.ARTHUR THOMSON, M.A.,LL.D.(Edin.;McGm;etCalif.

That excellent physiologist, Sir Michael Foster, used to say that "a living body is a vortex of chemical and molecular change"; and the image of a vortex expresses the fundamental fact of persistence, in spite of continual flux.

Here it is fitting to quote one of the classic passages in biological literature, what Huxley said of the vital vortex in his Crayfish (1880, p. 84} :

'The parallel between a whirlpool in a stream and a living being, which has often been drawn, is as just as it is striking. The whirl pool is permanent, but the particles of water which constitute it are incessantly changing. Those which enter it, on the one side, are whirled around and temporarily constitute a part of its individuality; and as they leave it on the other side, their places are made good by new-comers.

'Those who have seen the wonderful whirlpool, three miles below the Falls of Niagara, will not have forgotten the heaped-up wave which tumbles and tosses, a very embodiment of restless energy, where the swift stream hurrying from the Falls is compelled to make a sudden turn towards Lake Ontario. However changeful is the contour of this crest, this wave has been visible, approximately in the same place, and with the same general form, for centuries past. Seen from a mile off, it would appear to be a stationary hillock of water. Viewed closely, it is a typical expression of the conflicting impulses generated by a swift rush of material particles.

"Now, with all our appliances, we cannot get within a good many miles, so to speak, of the crayfish. If we could, we should see that it was nothing but the constant form of a similar turmoil of material molecules which are constantly flowing into the animal on the one side, and streaming out on the other,"

cool bananas ... greg

[labelwench]

Repeating patterns, from the microscopic through macroscopic, and dare we presume, infinity.

Motion in all things, as we are building the tools to observe.

The potential of energy being everywhere, humans having only learned to utilize the most rudimentary, and environmentally damaging forms.

Between motionless and movement lies the potential.

The potential of any single thing could occupy a human lifetime.

Perhaps we are soon to discover the potential within the human brain?

Regards,

Labelwench

[G_burnett]

Repeating patterns, from the microscopic through macroscopic, and dare we presume, infinity...

.....Perhaps we are soon to discover the potential within the human brain?

Regards,

Labelwench

"The number of the cells alone are more some have said then all the stars in the heavens ... but i think indeed that it is a close match of numbers give or take a few in the define of infinity and potential .. " unquote sage

Kind regards ~graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hi Greg,

TY for your wonderful post on "LIFE: OUTLINES OF GENERAL BIOLOGY BY SIR J.ARTHUR THOMSON."

LIFE: OUTLINES OF GENERAL BIOLOGY
BY SIR J.ARTHUR THOMSON, M.A.,LL.D.(Edin.;McGm;etCalif.

cool bananas ... greg

[labelwench]

Greetings, gentlemen of scientific persuasion,

Came across this in the news headlines. In case you have not yet read about the Halidron Collider's latest delay .....

http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archi...1/2003974.aspx

Have surmised of late that male/female differences are primarily that we run different operating systems and software.

Not all are compatible, and some can do permanent damage to your mainframe.

Regards,

Labelwench

[austintorn@aol.com]

The LHC will become operational on December 20, 2012.