[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience

Hi Vincent;

Well I had another jump in my theory after I messaged you last week. I was no more then 15 minutes into my 4 day trip when I was able to take what I thought of the week before, and advanced it to fit my theory on the conception of this universe. First, I was able to take the whirl I needed for adding multiple directions and motion to my solid, that I thought of a couple of weeks before. Then I was able to think of what was needed to have a whirl draw into a vortex.

So, I was able to move my theory along quite well. The only problem though is that I am dealing in a area that is not dealt with in any studies, so I get a lot of flack for my views. Thanks again for being the catalyst to my new way of seeing my theory and the universe.

Hi allen

nice award you picked up and another BC man too! drop by this way for a coffee some time, my treat.

Did you hear about the farmer down south that paraised Canadian smarts?

I guess a canadian went down there to see all these cotton pickers in the fields and told the farmer he could train a bunch of monkeys to do the same job so sure enough after a few months he had a a dozen or so in the fields working for bananas.
The farmers neibour saw this and went over to hear the tale and said "Yea, I heard them thar' canadians ar'prety smart up nort some, ... why they got a place called quebec with over fifty thousand frogs of some sort choppen trees!"

author unknown

Peace Graham.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by G_burnett

Now as i did say the chaotic fields were there yes, but as the planetary alignment is taking place and not enough on there own to cause the reversal.

I do not believe any one looks at these things this way but I do and the more i apply the rule one even resonance wave can fall in to place ... which never fails to amaze me since the Portland bridge warped to the wind.

guess i am a poet!

Peace! ~ graham

Your description to this is absolutely valid, however, please take note that I have mentioned that focused planetary alignment interferes, not limited only to external magnetic field, it can also trigger an inside out effect by induced precession. Here are some images for your contemplation:



Take note the votices are in clusters and evidently sunspot solar cycle are primarily related to planetary alignment of Jupiter and Saturn. These whirling storms in clusters generated by the amplified effect from the force dynamics reactions on the wobbling core are also generating magnetic storms, apparently chaos but are merely EMF interactions.

Best to you,

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience

Vincent;

What do you think of these questions that came to my mind a couple days ago?

What if measuring a point particle, is in fact the measuring of the zero point of a sub-atomic Vortex?

What if the measuring of the undulating event horizon of this Vortex, could be considered the measuring of a wave function, or better still a string?

Hi
I await that point particle q myself but the second is along the line of thought i have as that it is a wave function even the side effect of multiple hits of a the muon on electrons causing the spiral pig tail in chamber notation to form in magnetic field interaction shows in massive interaction there has to be varied considerations an views made to any conclusive determination.

measurement of wave function does indicate some of those interactions but the string measurement is to excuse my ignorance out of my thoughts right now.

Peace Graham

[PoPpAScience]

It is funny how I did not see it before, the out right dominance of the Vortex phenomena. All the endless studying I have done on so many subjects to do with science, and the best I could see was, spin. Now I see vortices in every thing I see. Its amazing how one can miss something so important. It is great to once again see the workings of the Universe with new eyes.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience

Hi Vincent;

Well I had another jump in my theory after I messaged you last week. I was no more then 15 minutes into my 4 day trip when I was able to take what I thought of the week before, and advanced it to fit my theory on the conception of this universe. First, I was able to take the whirl I needed for adding multiple directions and motion to my solid, that I thought of a couple of weeks before. Then I was able to think of what was needed to have a whirl draw into a vortex.

So, I was able to move my theory along quite well. The only problem though is that I am dealing in a area that is not dealt with in any studies, so I get a lot of flack for my views. Thanks again for being the catalyst to my new way of seeing my theory and the universe.

Hi Allen,

Am very glad to learn that you are rejuvenated and kicking in style. I know that explosion of discoveries you are now undergoing, its worth everything and is so purposeful.

Your zeroing onto vortical singularity is concisely thoughtful, once this is sorted out, the rest are just in the details, I am very honoured to exchange notes on vortex properties with you to the very best of my knowledge in a still quite limited spectrum of my inherently confined mind.

I have also lost count on my scars with flacks of such. Nonetheless, the state of beginning to see universe in the light of a comprehensible new frontier is simply amazing and awesome. I share the sentiments of yours trying to share your findings with another fellow being, hoping to reconcile a difference but often this is met with a repercussion not expected, however, as often it can also reflect my shortcomings with newly popped awareness. And over time some of those differences has reconciled on its own, and the parties involved are unified in a manner with a new found understanding. This is a great sensation that is worth all its apparently negative effects, however long the process might take.

This is a collection for descritions of singular vortex, hope you find the properties of its vortical singularity useful:
Singular vortex emerges from a single point of zero volume at a center of equilibrium in a state of viscous matter
Singular vortex is formed by vibrations with resonance frequencies in a state of viscous matter
Singular vortex is the dynamics of fictitious force interactions in a state of viscous matter
Singular vortex has a form as void in a state of viscous matter
Singular vortex is an entity of nothingness
Singular vortex is the oneness of its offsprings in a nothingness
Singular vortex is a warped surface
Singular vortex has a fictitious form vortically
Singular vortex has no volume in a geometrical reality
Singular vortex has no mass
Singular vortex does not really exist but its transformable apparent existence in a cyclical manner willl never cease
Singular vortex is a nothingness that begets infinites
Singular vortex has infinite vorticity
Singular vortex has infinite harmonic vortices dilated in progressive orders
Singular vortex is a fictitious portal that balances built up energy by circulation in a state of viscous matter that vortically tunnels through vacuum
Singular vortex is a universal power generator fictitiously created by nature naturally
Singular vortex does infinite work perpetually through conservation of angular momentum with fictitious forces consistently generated from nothingness
Singular vortex is always optimized with the most complex tendency for its shapes and reduces to a simplest possible form
Singular vortex is mysteriously paradoxical

Note: It has to be clarified that the fictitious, void and nothingness referred here is zero in relative term in a state of reality, energy is merely transferred from one state that is non material, by absolute definitions (e.g. vibration), into another state of matter conceived to have a physical reality; conservation of energy prevails in the process and the laws of physics are not violated. Nothingness in a relative state of reality does not equate to nothing, it is by ignoring relativity in a defined state of reality then nothingness becomes absolute nothing. Our perceptions are always in the circumstances of inherently limited bandwidths that preconceives in absolute reality within defined relevancy by ignoring relativity.

For your feedback to further clarify these reflections.

Best regards,

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo

Your description to this is absolutely valid, however, please take note that I have mentioned that focused planetary alignment interferes, not limited only to external magnetic field, it can also trigger an inside out effect by induced precession. Here are some images for your contemplation:



Take note the votices are in clusters and evidently sunspot solar cycle are primarily related to planetary alignment of Jupiter and Saturn. These whirling storms in clusters generated by the amplified effect from the force dynamics reactions on the wobbling core are also generating magnetic storms, apparently chaos but are merely EMF interactions.

Best to you,

Ph no flack from me! I just was trying to put it to vectors lol!

below post as well Ty sir! the empathic wave resonance of vortex creation is my rule one event horizon minus one .. and the internal is the forces going beyond the event horizon to add along the horizontal vector... the composition of the particle stream string, the nature of, quarks for the inference now more enjoyable ... perception perception

speaking of vortex do we not see the effect on a muon knocking an electron into a pigtail?

I wonder if there is a waiting effect on these things? I perceived today a particle form in empathy to another hold open a door for the other to exit. Then in a spin turn around to follow and match the speed of the other side by side?

And then to my amaze ment ... he got a kiss!

Peace!~ graham ahhh the science of natural phenomena

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience

Vincent;

What do you think of these questions that came to my mind a couple days ago?

What if measuring a point particle, is in fact the measuring of the zero point of a sub-atomic Vortex?

What if the measuring of the undulating event horizon of this Vortex, could be considered the measuring of a wave function, or better still a string?

Allen;

With thanks to Aaron, based on UVS on geometrical structure of an atom it is conceivable that measuring a point particle is in fact the measuring of the zero point of a sub-atomic Vortex. This nothingness is the very probable cause that quantum mechanics has been considered to be paradoxical. The measuring of the undulating event horizon of this Vortex could also be considered the measuring of a wave function, in the pretext that the undulating event horizon is the carrier of wave, as can be illustrated by dust disk of star Fomalhaut with its satellite vortices as spokes carried on leading arcs of dialated harmonic vortices that rotates and revolves around the main vortex in accretion disc of the star.

The paradoxical effect based on UVS is in the supposedly differentiated duality of nature. The key to find the answers to duality of nature should be by integrating inwardly the similarities of the absolute opposites on a transcended scenario to find their common oneness. Searching by differentiating outwardly would only exhaustively leads toward extreme complexities beyond comprehensible spectrum of its totality; often ends up in delusion caused by unsuspected paradoxes that defy intuition.

I do envision a string-vortex scenario, and believe if correctly constructed can bring about a more complete picture of the universe. Just speculating the string-vortex scenarios; branes (invisible arc of higher dimension harmonic vortex is a carrier for lower dimension spheroids/vortices to exist), strings (tiny EMF vortical interactions is the fundamental building blocks of all matters), multiverse (dilated higher order harmonic vortices/spheroids paradoxically segregated apparently by differentiation), etc. My concern is on the approach to make enquiry in the differentiated realities of a vortical singularity asking big questions that its reality or facts seems unreachable, that the resources for probing will be inevitably thinned out to hold any water at all to support any of those arguments.

What Aaron has suggested was more down-to-Earth, prove or try to find the proof in those events nearer to us that have very complete collected data, instead on mulling on something so remote that is almost beyond reach. And after this is accomplished, projection towards string-vortex might have a more solid ground. What make us think that the big answers are kept or held in such remote avenues? It could just be right before our very nose.

Just my two cents worth.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience

It is funny how I did not see it before, the out right dominance of the Vortex phenomena. All the endless studying I have done on so many subjects to do with science, and the best I could see was, spin. Now I see vortices in every thing I see. Its amazing how one can miss something so important. It is great to once again see the workings of the Universe with new eyes.

Is this not the Paradox of Potential popped Aware that has materialized in an awakening?

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Originally Posted by Profpat

Hi Vincent;
I have a few questions regarding your theory. I too believe vortices are an important part to nature, but you introduce it as a singularity. Being such, does that mean the other known four forces of nature are manisfestations of your singularity?
Pat

Hi Profpat;

With thanks to Aaron for his Tiny Bits Part I on Gravity that has elaborated on gravity mechanism is a push effect instead of of pull effect, this has unfolded an important paradoxical effect of nature for UVS. Based on UVS, it can be said that the known four forces of nature are manisfestations of this vortical singularity; comprehensively accounted for.



Please refer to a UVS topic on the geometrical structure of an atom that has clarified gravity and thus has comprehensively unifed the four fundamental forces of nature. See also the structure of a galaxy that has also clarified galactic gravity.

In an attempt to answer your other question as to if strings are tiny vortices, I can only speculate with UVS in a single model that logically it is, that strings in the model of singular vortex mehcnaism are EMF vortical interactions of matter in subatomic particles are fundamental building blocks, can be in a nothingness of dimensionless void in a geometrical reality, or the duality forms 1D waves or 3D point particles depending on the perceptions.

However, this is only conceptual and I have no evidence to offer at all other than just being logical based on UVS model, hopefully this as a reference would resonate in your TOE search for rational discoveries and does not confuse the issue, and I might not be accurate on this description at all.

Best to you,

[PoPpAScience]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo

Hi Allen,

Am very glad to learn that you are rejuvenated and kicking in style. I know that explosion of discoveries you are now undergoing, its worth everything and is so purposeful.

Your zeroing onto vortical singularity is concisely thoughtful, once this is sorted out, the rest are just in the details, I am very honoured to exchange notes on vortex properties with you to the very best of my knowledge in a still quite limited spectrum of my inherently confined mind.

I have also lost count on my scars with flacks of such. Nonetheless, the state of beginning to see universe in the light of a comprehensible new frontier is simply amazing and awesome. I share the sentiments of yours trying to share your findings with another fellow being, hoping to reconcile a difference but often this is met with a repercussion not expected, however, as often it can also reflect my shortcomings with newly popped awareness. And over time some of those differences has reconciled on its own, and the parties involved are unified in a manner with a new found understanding. This is a great sensation that is worth all its apparently negative effects, however long the process might take.

This is a collection for descritions of singular vortex, hope you find the properties of its vortical singularity useful:
Singular vortex emerges from a single point of zero volume at a center of equilibrium in a state of viscous matter
Singular vortex is formed by vibrations with resonance frequencies in a state of viscous matter
Singular vortex is the dynamics of fictitious force interactions in a state of viscous matter
Singular vortex has a form as void in a state of viscous matter
Singular vortex is an entity of nothingness
Singular vortex is the oneness of its offsprings in a nothingness
Singular vortex is a warped surface
Singular vortex has a fictitious form vortically
Singular vortex has no volume in a geometrical reality
Singular vortex has no mass
Singular vortex does not really exist but its transformable apparent existence in a cyclical manner willl never cease
Singular vortex is a nothingness that begets infinites
Singular vortex has infinite vorticity
Singular vortex has infinite harmonic vortices dilated in progressive orders
Singular vortex is a fictitious portal that balances built up energy by circulation in a state of viscous matter that vortically tunnels through vacuum
Singular vortex is a universal power generator fictitiously created by nature naturally
Singular vortex does infinite work perpetually through conservation of angular momentum with fictitious forces consistently generated from nothingness
Singular vortex is always optimized with the most complex tendency for its shapes and reduces to a simplest possible form
Singular vortex is mysteriously paradoxical

Note: It has to be clarified that the fictitious, void and nothingness referred here is zero in relative term in a state of reality, energy is merely transferred from one state that is non material, by absolute definitions (e.g. vibration), into another state of matter conceived to have a physical reality; conservation of energy prevails in the process and the laws of physics are not violated. Nothingness in a relative state of reality does not equate to nothing, it is by ignoring relativity in a defined state of reality then nothingness becomes absolute nothing. Our perceptions are always in the circumstances of inherently limited bandwidths that preconceives in absolute reality within defined relevancy by ignoring relativity.

For your feedback to further clarify these reflections.

Best regards,

Vincent my friend;

I do not know if you realize it or not, that you have given me all the information I need to verify my theory. WOW!! I can not stop reading it over and over again. You truly are the missing link in my studies. Thanks.

If I exchange your word of nothingness for Paradox of Potential, I could add most of what is written here into my theory. Daily I am more and more comfortable with the theory that the vortex and its Paradoxical nature of pure Potential, is at the route of all there is.

It is great that two people coming from different ends of one spectrum are intersecting here in this forum. I look forward to traveling closer to your end of the spectrum, and hope you can come closer to my end of the spectrum.