The Universal Vortical Singularity

[dipayankar]

Just off the cuff, I was wondering how UVS explains inflation.

[G_burnett]

Just off the cuff, I was wondering how UVS explains inflation.

input, need input. define inflation. g

the just is model of a point singularity expanding from state of static exist or creation ... creation meaning cyclic rebirth?

I am lost with the concept of just was a state as being subjective and not objective and thus the standard model failing the reality of no just was or just is.

i can not answer the your want explanation in physics to the standard model unless you model the torus with or with out the boundaries put to the event of rebirth and renewal of part or whole of the all and i am leaning toward a part of the all in the event. As part considered then the UVS makes sense to me.

[dipayankar]

Inflation as I know is the period just after the Big Bang where the Universe suddenly inflated geometrically without any reason...

[G_burnett]

that is why the axiom of a big bang does not make sense and i prefer an inversion.

kind regards graham

[dipayankar]

How would you prefer an inversion?

[G_burnett]

the inversion model is based on the postulate of a torus containment during fluid flow in the tube of contained energy putting boundaries to dimension of the torus which may have .. let me say non effectable reach but never the less when one dimension of the two containment features fails the result is an inversion of the torus and reverse of the containment to a differrent value. This inversion releases but no longer in my mind as a BB picture of release ... the new gamma picture for support clearly indicates if a big bang is considered all would equally disperse and this is not the case unless we are reverting after a big band inward and not out ward and thus clyclic is proven for clarity of the torus in the second ponder.

that is why i suppose the inversion over the BB standard ... preference IMHO

kind regards graham

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Just off the cuff, I was wondering how UVS explains inflation.

Ever since galaxies are receding in acceleration has been observed and these are proportional with the distance of the galaxies observed, the classic Big Bang model that describes expansion of space is similar to a conventional explosion was then fell apart. Cosmic inflation answers the classic conundrum of the big bang cosmology, and cosmic inflation is thus now considered part of the standard hot big bang cosmology. The analogy for the observable universe in the Big Bang model now adopts the raisin pudding model to explain the observed phenomenon with accelerated expansion of space in the cosmic inflation; space is expanding exponentially.

Animated raisin pudding model of the BB expansion.

Limited by light speed, the optical observation of the physical universe is negated by time dilation effect, the galaxies in a nearer timeline from Earth would therefore paradoxically appear to be receding at lower velocity than those distant galaxies at a further timeline, this would render an optical illusion in time dilated image that the Universe was expanding in acceleration. If the Universe was vortically expanding in acceleration, the time dilated effect would paradoxically render the observation of the physical universe to be expanding in deceleration instead. Qualitatively, the conclusion of Big Bang model that space is expanding exponentially is simply a logical fallacy.

From the UVS perspective, the observable physical universe was expanding in deceleration. The phenomenon of cosmic inflation is merely an optical cognitive paradox; this is a complexly inversed illusion render in paradoxical effect of UVS.

[dipayankar]

Hence then in all probability the Universe will stop accelerating totally and fall back into itself (due to gravity). This way we will have an end to the Universe. So the Universe is not eternal.

Ever since galaxies are receding in acceleration has been observed and these are proportional with the distance of the galaxies observed, the classic Big Bang model that describes expansion of space is similar to a conventional explosion was then fell apart. Cosmic inflation answers the classic conundrum of the big bang cosmology, and cosmic inflation is thus now considered part of the standard hot big bang cosmology. The analogy for the observable universe in the Big Bang model now adopts the raisin pudding model to explain the observed phenomenon with accelerated expansion of space in the cosmic inflation; space is expanding exponentially.

Animated raisin pudding model of the BB expansion.

Limited by light speed, the optical observation of the physical universe is negated by time dilation effect, the galaxies in a nearer timeline from Earth would therefore paradoxically appear to be receding at lower velocity than those distant galaxies at a further timeline, this would render an optical illusion in time dilated image that the Universe was expanding in acceleration. If the Universe was vortically expanding in acceleration, the time dilated effect would paradoxically render the observation of the physical universe to be expanding in deceleration instead. Qualitatively, the conclusion of Big Bang model that space is expanding exponentially is simply a logical fallacy.

From the UVS perspective, the observable physical universe was expanding in deceleration. The phenomenon of cosmic inflation is merely an optical cognitive paradox; this is a complexly inversed illusion render in paradoxical effect of UVS.

[Vincent Wee-Foo]

Hence then in all probability the Universe will stop accelerating totally and fall back into itself (due to gravity).

What you have mentioned above is one possibility based on standard model of physical cosmology.

UVS model offers an alternative hypothesis. All physical existence have limitations, a vortically weaved Universe (aka physical universe) could eventually dissipate similar to any vortical form. An analogue of this is a vortically formed hurricane, when loosing its torque-induced precession it will dissipate and decays.

This way we will have an end to the Universe. So the Universe is not eternal.

From the UVS perspective, you are correct that the Universe have an end and it is not eternal.

IMHO, the universe that superposition the Universe seems to be a conceptual framework for the Universe. This universe in a realm from the human perspective of spatial space has no end, conceptually it is eternal.

[G_burnett]

Hi Vincent

i have been having a ponder to view gravity observed as neither in or out causal effect by view of wave in the small that seems to transfer to the big. ... very preliminary in my ponder but I have to go down that path in my self investigation of the all.

have you ever given it such thought or argued with yourself against your axioms?

Kind regards, graham